Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot


Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Parking Lot


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2009, 10:03 PM   #106
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Another one bites the dust

"irresolvable conflicts" sounds like they're getting divorced

Republican Gregg withdraws from commerce post consideration - CNN.com
Shouldn't you clear up what you expect and want from a job before you accept it? Obama really needs to hire competent people to help him hire competent people.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-13-2009, 03:56 PM   #107
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,525
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

that's called succumbing to party pressure, my friend
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 04:21 PM   #108
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,458
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Yeah, I'm pretty sure he knew from the get-go what he was getting into. Besides, Gregg threw his name in the hat, no one was exactly chasing him down.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 12:23 PM   #109
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 37
Posts: 2,906
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

I don't understand why someone would accept to head a department he tried to eliminate? That would be like Reagan on the department of education. Politics as usual.
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 01:13 PM   #110
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,525
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

so he had no idea what he was getting into? come on, even you don't believe that. im sure they had a long talk about policy, and what direction the president wanted to go. he got caught up in Obama's popularity, and, after the fact, got a few phone calls telling him it wasn't cool to work with a democrat. some things in Washington will never change
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 10:48 AM   #111
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,525
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

nothing like saying F... you to the people that need it GOP governors consider turning down stimulus money
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:20 PM   #112
Special Teams
 
Miller101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
nothing like saying F... you to the people that need it GOP governors consider turning down stimulus money
And one of those Governors runs a state that has the third highest unemployment rate in the country....................What a FREAKIN IDIOT!!! How the heck can you even question free money when your state is all screwed up like that? I mean, when Bush gave me $700 I took it! Even though he was Republican, I happily took that money then went up to Atlantic City and had some fun!

How can you even question free money. Especially, when you NEED IT!!! I just don't get it.
__________________
"And the Redskins went down there and manhandled them and they basically undressed them and now everybody's been lining up to get a piece of them." - John Riggins on the last game we played in Texas Stadium
Miller101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:35 PM   #113
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 13,097
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller101 View Post
And one of those Governors runs a state that has the third highest unemployment rate in the country....................What a FREAKIN IDIOT!!! How the heck can you even question free money when your state is all screwed up like that? I mean, when Bush gave me $700 I took it! Even though he was Republican, I happily took that money then went up to Atlantic City and had some fun!

How can you even question free money. Especially, when you NEED IT!!! I just don't get it.
Maybe because it isn't free. Would you have taken that 700, if it came with a requirement that you vote Republican for the next 4 elections? Would you have taken it if it had said that by taking it you approved of the Iraq war? What about if it was simply that you had to repay it + 50% compound interest?
The "stimulus" bill comes with many such proviso's.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:42 PM   #114
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

It's so dumb it ain't even funny. Fortunately there are provisions in the stimulus bill that says something to the effect of "governors must explicitly reject or accept aid money...if the governor reject the money the State house and senate can override the rejection and take the money anyways."

The truly sad part is that when primary time rolls rejecting the money will get them conservative street creds and thus get them the presidential nods over people who accepted the money, at least that's the thinking anyways. I'm no soothsayer but one thing I'm pretty sure of is that President Obama will knock them out once again.


South Carolina Wasssup!

Last edited by saden1; 02-20-2009 at 12:49 PM.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:45 PM   #115
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Maybe because it isn't free. Would you have taken that 700, if it came with a requirement that you vote Republican for the next 4 elections? Would you have taken it if it had said that by taking it you approved of the Iraq war? What about if it was simply that you had to repay it + 50% compound interest?
The "stimulus" bill comes with many such proviso's.

You took the stage, you got to do the presentation....the floor is all yours.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:50 PM   #116
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 13,097
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
You took the stage, you got to do the presentation....the floor is all yours.
Right after Lunch
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 08:12 PM   #117
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 13,097
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
You took the stage, you got to do the presentation....the floor is all yours.
so, i finally got to lunch, then got back and he** broke loose here at work. Finally settled down, and i decided I didn't want to respond purely with anecdotal stuff so i looked up the text and started reading, wow, dry...

so to the point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by me View Post
Maybe because it isn't free. ...
The "stimulus" bill comes with many such proviso's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saden1 View Post
You took the stage, you got to do the presentation....the floor is all yours.
here is one: (at this point i am not debating the validity of the proviso, just that the money comes with stipulations;provisos;etc)
Quote:
SEC. 1110. USE OF AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL.

(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds appropriated

or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron and steel used in the project is produced in the United States.

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply in
any case in which the head of the Federal department or agency involved finds that—

(1) applying subsection (a) would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron and steel are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) inclusion of iron and steel produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent.
(c) WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR WAIVER.—If the head of a Federal department or agency determines that it is necessary to waive the application of subsection (a)
based on a finding under subsection (b), the head of the department or agency shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed written justification as to why the provision is being waived.
(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘public
building’’ and ‘‘public work’’ have the meanings given such terms in section 1 of the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 8 10c) and include airports, bridges, canals, dams, dikes, pipelines, railroads, multiline mass transit systems, roads, tunnels, harbors, and piers.
another:
Quote:
SEC. 1114. REQUIRED PARTICIPATION IN E-VERIFY PROGRAM.

None of the funds made available in this Act may

be used to enter into a contract with an entity that does not participate in the E-verify program described in section 401(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1324a note).
and finally
Quote:
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OPERATIONS

For an additional amount for ‘‘State Unemployment
Insurance and Employment Service Operations’’ for grants to the States in accordance with section 6 of the Wagner-Peyser Act, $500,000,000, which may be expended from the Employment Security Administration Account in the Unemployment Trust Fund, and which shall be available for obligation on the date of enactment of this Act: Provided, That such funds shall remain available to the States through September 30, 2010: Provided further, That, with respect to such funds, section 6(b)(1) of such Act shall be applied by substituting ‘‘one-third’’ for ‘‘two thirds’’ in subparagraph (A), with the remaining one-third
I will be the first to admit that all three of these examples may or may not be good in and of themselves. I tried to read all 647 pages, but realized -it ain't happening tonight (or possibly ever). Not to mention that alot of the requirements I did see in the text forced you to go to another federal regulation to see what requirement they were adding to the money. eg the last one refers to the Wagner-Peyser Act whatever that is. (i am sure it is humane and compassionate regulation)

I hope that this shows the money wasn't freely given, it did have strings attached.

And as Firstdown pointed out, every cent of this is borrowed money against future tax income, none is budgeted for. (and yes the republican overspent too thats a separate argument and I would love to see accountability all around)
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 08:50 PM   #118
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 13,097
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Jindal to refuse some stimulus money
Quote:
[Louisiana gov. Bobby Jindal said] “The federal money in this bill will run out in less than three years for this benefit and our businesses would then be stuck paying the bill,” Jindal said. “We must be careful and thoughtful as we examine all the strings attached to the funding in this package. We cannot grow government in an unsustainable way.”

In an interview Friday,[Mississippi governor Haley] Barbour said he, too, would likely decline funds for broadening access to unemployment insurance.

“Subject to learning more, my position is that Mississippi won’t accept funds that require us to have a tax increase later, because [they would force] us to change our rules for qualifying for unemployment compensation,” he said.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 11:12 PM   #119
Registered User
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 35
Posts: 10,069
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

I appreciate your research and I believe there are some legitimate concerns. I think it's important to discuss these concerns and have a rational basis for rejecting the money. I don't really like the Buy American policy but then again I don't like the idea of the Chinese dumping cheap steel on our market when we're trying to make sure Americans are gainfully employed. You have to walk a fine line and while the free market is preferred but sometimes you have to fight back.

A lot of states are running out of money to fund their unemployment expenditures because a lot of people are getting laid off faster and staying unemployed longer than expected. If the good people of Louisiana and Mississippi have enough money to fund their unemployment expenditures I expect them to turn down the money and in the process keep their existing rules. I am curious though what these changes to their rules are and how would changes to these rules impact them negatively compared to the alternative? What is the alternative? What do they intend to do when their unemployment numbers rise? Don't employers in their states have the ability to challenge frivolous unemployment claims?


One thing I want be sure of though is that laid-off people are entitled to unemployment benefits for a reasonable amount of time. In the words of my boy Joe the Plumber "it's there to be used not abused." Bloodletting use to be cool up until late 19th century, not so much in the 21st century. You dig?

Last edited by saden1; 02-21-2009 at 08:49 AM.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 01:44 PM   #120
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 13,097
Re: Updated: Daschle Withdraws; Didn't these guys have to fill out an application?

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
I appreciate your research and I believe there are some legitimate concerns. I think it's important to discuss these concerns and have a rational basis for rejecting the money.
...
Bloodletting use to be cool up until late 19th century, not so much in the 21st century.
You dig?
And that is all I was trying to say, is that it may/may not be good policy to reject the money, but it does not make a governer an idiot to reject money that he feels would ultimately harm his/her state. I am also glad that the provision is in the bill that lets the state governments bring it to a vote. Hopefully there will be meaningful discussions and not just rhetoric that blasts someone for possibly rejecting federal aid.

I dig.
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31936 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25