![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 | |||
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,202
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 Quote:
![]() I was actually referring to folks like these: FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate / UCLA Newsroom The truth about stimulus and the Depression - Feb. 11, 2009 and also FDR's own Treasury Secretary Henry Mrogenthau, On May 9, 1939, with unemployment at 20%, speaking to the House Ways and Means Committee Congress, Morgenthau said "We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. And I have just one interest, and if I am wrong...somebody else can have my job. I want to see the country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promise....I say after eight years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started....and an enourmous debt to boot!" from wiki article on Social Security: Economic concerns One reason for the proposed changes in 1939 was a growing concern over the impact that the reserves created by the 1935 act were having on the economy. The Recession of 1937 was blamed on the government, tied to the abrupt decrease in government spending and the $2 billion that had been collected in Social Security taxes.[33] Quote:
from wiki: By 2017, the government is expected to have borrowed nearly $4.3 trillion against the Social Security Trust fund.[4] By 2041, the Social Security Fund is expected to be officially exhausted, as payments in excess of receipts draw it down to zero.[5] There are certain key implications to understand under current law, if no reforms are implemented:
In FDR's wildest dreams I'm sure he didn't envision the program spiraling so wildly out of control. Quote:
__________________ ...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. | |||
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,644
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 nuclear and private SS (no ind/gov borrowing against, 5%+ yearly ROI) would be huge cost savers and i wouldn't be against a japanese type medicare system (where you have a small % to pay of your own bills to put the onus and cost control on the user for non preventive care, and then you could tag on a higher % if the condition was preventable - ie lung cancer due to smoking for someone born after date X to encourage users to decrease national medical spending individually - super simplified, but as a summary) as long as it was implemented correctly. then there's tax and tort reform, farm subsidies (props for obama trying to open that, the dems are going to block it though). we'll just have to see how it works out though.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,282
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 Don't be stupid, just because I don't mind paying taxes it doesn't mean I am willing to pay more than my fair share. Jim Calhoun keeping it real:
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 49
Posts: 15,282
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 Quote:
As for whether those making 250K are paying their fair share, I'm not going down that road...we beat that horse to death.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,476
| Re: Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs, Starting 2011 Figured I would just piggyback off of this one since it's budget (Veterans Affairs) related. I would totally be upset if this suggestion was given any consideration... Vets object to billing private insurance for service injuries.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |