Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Potential Epic Fail (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=32059)

RedskinRat 09-23-2009 12:55 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
[quote=SmootSmack;594203]No better team than the Lions to finally get this offense going

[URL="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204488304574429293233493218.html"]The NFL’s Worst Defense, Ever - WSJ.com[/URL][/quote]

I have the feeling they are saying similar things about us:

[url=http://www.freep.com/article/20090922/COL22/909220361/1048/SPORTS05/Vs.--Skins--the-Lions-have-a-chance]Michael Rosenberg: Vs. 'Skins, the Lions have a chance | Detroit Free Press | Freep.com[/url]

Mechanix544 09-23-2009 02:46 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
Tis a scary outcome, that's for sure. But if it means we drop Zorn and replace Campbell and finally commit to getting a Qb in here that can develop into a winner, or be one off the bat, then it just might be a good thing.

If thats what it takes, then that is what it takes. Skins fans, lets get ready to look to the future with a new HC and QB.

SouperMeister 09-23-2009 03:48 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
[quote=Mechanix544;594342]Tis a scary outcome, that's for sure. But if it means we drop Zorn and replace Campbell and finally commit to getting a Qb in here that can develop into a winner, or be one off the bat, then it just might be a good thing.

If thats what it takes, then that is what it takes. Skins fans, lets get ready to look to the future with a new HC and QB.[/quote]It almost sounds like you want Zorn and Campbell to fail. Understand this, if we blow up the ship and bring in a new HC and QB, we may pine for the good old days of 8-8 or 9-7. I can easily see this becoming a perrenial 5-11 team if we start over. Campbell played solid ball against the Rams, making many plays with both his arm and his legs.

mredskins 09-27-2009 04:22 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
Just want to point out this thread where everyone called for my head. I still feel like shit, it will be a long season. =(

The Goat 09-27-2009 04:25 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
[quote=SouperMeister;594373]It almost sounds like you want Zorn and Campbell to fail. Understand this, if we blow up the ship and bring in a new HC and QB, we may pine for the good old days of 8-8 or 9-7. I can easily see this becoming a perrenial 5-11 team if we start over. Campbell played solid ball against the Rams, making many plays with both his arm and his legs.[/quote]

I think sticking w/ Zorn guarantees 5-11 at best...possibly 2-14 because just about every team in the league can put up 16+ points and Zorn absolutely cannot figure out how to score more than two touchdowns in a game. He's done...yet again we have another guy within the franchize who would not have a job in the NFL outside Redskins park (the other is Vinny, obviously).

GoSkins! 09-27-2009 04:27 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
[quote=SouperMeister;594373]It almost sounds like you want Zorn and Campbell to fail. Understand this, if we blow up the ship and bring in a new HC and QB, we may pine for the good old days of 8-8 or 9-7. I can easily see this becoming a perrenial 5-11 team if we start over. Campbell played solid ball against the Rams, making many plays with both his arm and his legs.[/quote]

Tell that to Mike Singlteary and San Francisco. Zorn and Vinny both are responsible for this underachieving. Zorn by not having his team mentally ready for this game and Vinny for not addressing the offensive line.

Zorn isn't a bad coach, just to much to fast IMHO.

TheSmurfs22 09-27-2009 05:06 PM

Re: Potential Epic Fail
 
Until we address our O Line we are going to struggle. We cannot keep ignoring the line. I wish Cerrato would wake up!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.19407 seconds with 9 queries