![]() |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=GusFrerotte;795695]Gabbert is a great QB, but not worth trading up for. I would be very happy if we ended up with Ponder and get a good prospect QB next year in rounds 2-5.[/quote]
I think the Ponder interest is basically non existent |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
If the Skins trade up, they will continue to prove how to use the draft to never win. These spread offense QBs are not worth the risk of trading up for.
Draft Cameron Jordon @ 10, or trade down and get 2nd tier QB or Ryan Kerrigan. Use extra picks for 3-4 style LB/DE while adding a few more picks to be used on DE/LB, CB, OL. This team has many holes, and for once all positions of need should be filled with the draft first. Band aids can come later through free agency. |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
^ the redskins are taking a QB my man it's just a fact. Idk if it's going to be at 2, 5 , 10? Either way we r taking a QB
|
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=drew54;795706]If the Skins trade up, they will continue to prove how to use the draft to never win. These spread offense QBs are not worth the risk of trading up for.
Draft Cameron Jordon @ 10, or trade down and get 2nd tier QB or Ryan Kerrigan. Use extra picks for 3-4 style LB/DE while adding a few more picks to be used on DE/LB, CB, OL. This team has many holes, and for once all positions of need should be filled with the draft first. Band aids can come later through free agency.[/quote] I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not. But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue. If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine. |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
Lmao hey sunshine was a baller
|
Re: Your final prediction for #10
LOL. Well if nothing else, we've already got a name for Gabbert here.
|
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=SmootSmack;795711]I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not.
But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue. [B]If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to[/B] I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine.[/quote] So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks? |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
I am just anti QB @ 10 and pro Defense or trade down for more picks to acquire defense.
|
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=Lotus;795716]So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks?[/quote]
Yes word is a 1st and a 3rd in 2012 |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
This has got to be BS.
Trade up? |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=30gut;795720]This has got to be BS.
Trade up?[/quote] Idk it seems pretty legit from a few sources |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=Lotus;795716]So how do we trade up without giving up our #2 pick? Next year's picks?[/quote]
Yup. I don't believe this is a smokescreen, but I also don't think we're going to trade up to get Gabbert. I think someone else will offer more, or the Broncos will just stay at #2 and choose from 3 great defensive options in Darreus, Miller, and Peterson. I think, if we trade up, we may move up four or five spots for Locker. But that's just my opinion. |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=skinsfaninok;795719]Yes word is a 1st and a 3rd in 2012[/quote]
I've heard 1st and 4th, so there are certainly different options being thrown out |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
[quote=SmootSmack;795711]I don't see how spread offense is an impediment. I think it's been proven that it's not.
But I'll tell you why I don't want Gabbert. Because the only Missouri QB who should ever grace a Redskins uniform is Chase Daniel!! His numbers in college crush Gabbert's. Still pissed we let him go. I may just sue. If we don't give up our 2nd, which it appears we won't have to I'm not opposed to trading up for a QB. I just hope that QB is Locker, not Sunshine.[/quote]Okay, I'll bite: whats the argument for Locker over Sunshine Gabbert? |
Re: Your final prediction for #10
@SS
A first and a forth sounds much better As far as the QB I'm cool with either one (BG/JL) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.