Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Positions Which Need to Be Addressed (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=44990)

Dirtbag59 11-02-2011 12:45 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=SirClintonPortis;854767][B]The draft is not a buffet in which you have control over which players you get to eat.[/B] You don't get to decide who is a playmaker at a certain position, you find them and take them, just like you don't get to pick where to dig an oil well or mine for gold. The benefits can be rather large, i.e Adrian Peterson, Area 51, and Kerrakpo.[/quote]

Yes it is
[YT]iVlkZVAw8Gc[/YT]

tryfuhl 11-02-2011 12:50 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=NC_Skins;854612]Our biggest and most important upgrade we need is without a doubt:


1) [U][B]The Fans[/B][/U] - I keep hearing how Redskins fans are some of the most intelligent out of the NFL, but I simply don't see it. (probably same throughout the league) I see a good many who are just as knee jerk reactionary about this team as our lousy owner is. What kills me the most is these same people are probably the same ones bashing Snyder for doing exactly what they are doing. /facepalm



2) [U][B]QB[/B][/U]- The most important position on the field. QB play can make lesser talent look better and make better talent look worse. It hasn't been all of our QBs fault, but it certainly needs to be upgraded big time.


3)[B][U]OL[/U][/B] - We are seeing what happens when injuries occur on the OL front. The line had been playing well for most of the year, but we seriously need some more depth and upgrades in the OL. I do think people are overlooking the injuries.

4) [U][B]WR[/B][/U]- Hard to tell if our receivers are part of the problem or it's QB play. We are in dire need of a big time play maker though. If it's a QB problem, then you can move this down the list.

5) [B][U]CBs[/U][/B]- Time to trade D. Hall in for somebody with less mouth and more action.



This team really has so many needs. I think people's expectations went too high with the early wins and great off-season. This team still lacks a ton of talent from top to bottom. We are however getting there.[/quote]
The fans? We don't get on the field. The pats only have fans because they started winning. We aren't going to turn the team around. Is that you Larry Michael?

That Guy 11-02-2011 06:51 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
rogers or grimes would be great gets at CB. hall is a #2, wilson isn't that good... so much for that being an "upgrade" like i kept hearing in the offseason :P.

WRs are available... bowe would be best, but stever johnson would probably be the best value. OL I'd have to check, but there's usually someone there when what we've got is so average/bad.

SmootSmack 11-02-2011 10:11 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
I think Josh Johnson is someone else worth at least considering

JoeRedskin 11-02-2011 10:25 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=SmootSmack;854862]I think Josh Johnson is someone else worth at least considering[/quote]

Why? He seems like a Josh Freeman "light". Is he really anything more than a back-up?

SmootSmack 11-02-2011 11:39 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
Solid young QB with upside. More, in my opinion, than anyone currently on our roster. Bridge from Beck to Moore :)

Lotus 11-02-2011 11:43 AM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=SmootSmack;854862]I think Josh Johnson is someone else worth at least considering[/quote]

I like Josh Johnson. He or Flynn would be about the only young vets that I would consider. Is Johnson's contract expiring?

CultBrennan59 11-02-2011 12:25 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=SmootSmack;854862]I think Josh Johnson is someone else worth at least considering[/quote]

He's a backup for a reason. All he does is runs. They put him in on 3rd or 4th and short so he can run the option. NO.

Matt Flynn is a better backup option. But really You need to build through the draft. Get a Luck if you can trade up enough picks for him, or a Foles , or Kellen Moore.

Alvin Walton 11-02-2011 12:35 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
Redskins auditioning new bodies for the secondary.

[url=http://profootball.scout.com/a.z?s=127&p=9&c=2&cid=1123946&nid=5774795&fhn=1]Scout.com: Fabian Washington Profile[/url]

Lotus 11-02-2011 01:16 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=CultBrennan59;854933]He's a backup for a reason. All he does is runs. They put him in on 3rd or 4th and short so he can run the option. NO.

Matt Flynn is a better backup option. But really You need to build through the draft. Get a Luck if you can trade up enough picks for him, or a Foles , or Kellen Moore.[/quote]

What you are really saying: I like Flynn over Johnson because Flynn is white and I am a QB racist.

Big C 11-02-2011 04:56 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
flynn and josh johnson are no better than beck or grossman. it would be a waste to invest in them. we should only get clear upgrades for the qb position (veteran star or highly touted rookie in the draft).

SmootSmack 11-02-2011 04:57 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=Big C;855033]flynn and josh johnson are no better than beck or grossman. it would be a waste to invest in them. we should only get clear upgrades for the qb position (veteran star or highly touted rookie in the draft).[/quote]

Jay Cutler?

CultBrennan59 11-02-2011 05:26 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=Lotus;854960]What you are really saying: I like Flynn over Johnson because Flynn is white and I am a QB racist.[/quote]

:confused:Or I'm saying draft a guy and develop him

Big C 11-02-2011 06:10 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
[quote=SmootSmack;855034]Jay Cutler?[/quote]

i dont think that he is a realistic option but hes played for shanny so who knows. if drew brees isnt resigned he'd be someone i think we'd have to look at. same with peyton manning if the colts were looking to trade him (mike greenberg and herm edwards debated that possibility this morning at length). basically, i dont want us to sign some unproven nobody qb/career backup and expect him to compete for the starting qb position. id rather sign/trade for an established veteran, or draft a qb in the first 2 rounds to be our guy

rocnrik 11-02-2011 06:44 PM

Re: Positions Which Need to Be Addressed
 
I also dont believe we will win another game this year..I hope I am wrong..but who really should we beat? miami? really..Not a hater just a realist!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.20570 seconds with 9 queries