Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

Maybe worth it!!!

Yes!!!!

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk;894428]



love it[/QUOTE]



I love it too.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=GusFrerotte;894495]Nope. We don't have the team in place to make a run yet. I thought we were on the right path for a change to build a solid winner. Any good SB winning HOF QB in the last 20 years always had a star studded cast to help him win. Do you think we are a star studded team? We gave up the ghost for a guy with reat talent, but who doesn't have the best Wr corp or O line protecting him. If our WR corp was more reliable and the O line solid the deal would have been OK, but with the reality of the situation, this is a big ass gamble.[/quote]

Neither did the Colts with Manning. He made those players good. Look what happened when he got hurt. The team fell to $h!t. Just chill out a bit and see how this thing rides out....

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

Too funny!

Rich Eisen ‏ @richeisen
Good one. RT @WhitlockJason: Source: David Stern plans to veto Redskins-Rams trade. Story is developing, check back later for details.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

RGIII better be the real deal and not the second coming of Akili Smith or the Redskins are ****ed for a long, long, time.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

Let me ask this question - assuming that the redskins really had a slim chance for manning, did Shanahan really have another option this year at qb- without getting fired?

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=warriorzpath;894505]Let me ask this question - assuming that the redskins really had a slim chance for manning, did Shanahan really have another option this year at qb- without getting fired?[/quote]

Yes.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=Ruhskins;894503]Too funny!

Rich Eisen ‏ @richeisen
Good one. RT @WhitlockJason: Source: David Stern plans to veto Redskins-Rams trade. Story is developing, check back later for details.[/quote]

:lol: I almost shit myself for a half a second until I realized David Stern is not Roger Goodell. I guess this means we won't get Chris Paul to be our #1 receiver??

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;894504]RGIII better be the real deal and not the second coming of Akili Smith or the Redskins are ****ed for a long, long, time.[/quote]

Shoot, he can be good and we're still ****ed. He had better be solid gold for this price.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

Persistence is key

[url]https://twitter.com/#!/AdamSchefter/status/178331690710736897[/url]

Trade will not change Redskins plans in pursuing Peyton Manning. Intend to talk with and try to sign him, even if considered a longshot.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=Lotus;894468]But you were not right. You did not predict 3 #1's and a #2. [B]Smug without a cause are you.[/B][/quote]

Yoda? Really? I just said that when people said I was crazy for offering up (whats now nothing) a large amount of picks people said it wouldn't be that much I said it would to get it to that. That's all I was trying to say. I was gonna message you this but I can't message for some reason. Maybe you can tell me how.

[B]So Lotus, who would you get for RG3 to throw to since we have no second rounder now?[/B]

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=Lotus;894494]Instead of giving up 3 #1's and a #2, I'd have stayed at 6 and taken Tannehill.[/quote]In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.

But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.

If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.

So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;894511]Yoda? Really? I just said that when people said I was crazy for offering up (whats now nothing) a large amount of picks people said it wouldn't be that much I said it would to get it to that. That's all I was trying to say. I was gonna message you this but I can't message for some reason. Maybe you can tell me how.

[B]So Lotus, who would you get for RG3 to throw to since we have no second rounder now?[/B][/quote]

Vincent Jackson
Marques Colston
Robert Meachem
Reggie Wayne
Pierre Garcon
Mario Manningham

But I'm not Lotus....

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 

[quote=warriorzpath;894486]But sometimes you have to go all in. RGIII is not going to be a dud. And the redskins finally have a potentially great qb. In the nfl, a great qb and a great defensive line may be all you need. It could be argued that- that's what the giants had this year.

It appeared to be true- Shanahan would be fired if he didn't pick up RGIII or Manning- or by some miracle another qb would have been able to play well enough for redskins to get into the playoffs.

What would you have done in Shanahans place?[/quote]

Going all in isn't the style that BA and Shanny started off with in their first two drafts. Get more picks, draft smart, draft needs. RG III right now might be akin to Vick in ATL. He will be fun to watch, but with a less talented supporting cast. Face it you go all in and lose, you lose for awhile. What happened when we drafted Shuler, many thought he was a sure thing also way back then. The Shuler debacle killed this team for over a decade. We still haven't found a franchise QB!! I really hope I am eating crow this time in 2013, but if I am not Holy Shit, you might be looking at another 2-4 years of crappy win loss records.