Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=Lotus;1031324]That is not a good answer to Ruhskin's reasonable question. Citing sources is the honest and respectful thing to do and "what posts may follow" doesn't change this.[/quote]

Where are you to do this to smoot? Why do you care? A lot of sources talk on anonymity. I gave a reasonable enough citing earlier.

We have moved on. I suggest you do to.

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;1031327]Where are you to do this to smoot? Why do you care? A lot of sources talk on anonymity. [B]I gave a reasonable enough citing earlier. [/B]

We have moved on. I suggest you do to.[/quote]

No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=NC_Skins;1031320]Well since Trestman is a offensive guy, my guess it would have been to replace Kyle?? Getting warmer?....lol


What we needed was a replacement at DC. Ughhh...[/quote]

I've said too much already

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=Lotus;1031330]No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.[/quote]

It's ok Lotus. Let's move on

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=Lotus;1031330]No, you gave no citing earlier. And you are famous in this parts for not offering attribution. Again, it is simply honest and respectful to cite sources.[/quote]

[url]http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-locker-room/54462-stick-a-fork-em-they-done-9.html#post1031283[/url]

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

u guys worry about too many things, Who cares about it anymore?? Tres is the bears coach and we still have shanny

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

smoot actually works in the industry, so i'm sorry (well, actually i'm not) but i trust him a lot more than someone that has no real basis for his info beyond "i said so" or "i heard it from a guy who knows... no really, i swear."

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

It's ok. Let's move on

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

So, moving on to the actual topic of the thread, Atlanta. Wow. 1-4 -- I would not have predicted that. And Julio Jones may be out for the season.

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=calia;1031381]So, moving on to the actual topic of the thread, Atlanta. Wow. 1-4 -- I would not have predicted that. And Julio Jones may be out for the season.[/quote]

I would stick a spork, but not a fork...not just yet with Steven Jax coming back

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=Chico23231;1031383]I would stick a spork, but not a fork...not just yet with Steven Jax coming back[/quote]

With no Julio Jones and a banged up R. White, Atlanta is going to have no passing threat. Teams will just stack the box and stop Steven Jax. It's not like he's AP to take over a game and be the sole producer on offense.

Re: Stick a fork in em', they are done!
 

[quote=Ruhskins;1031387]With no Julio Jones and a banged up R. White, Atlanta is going to have no passing threat. Teams will just stack the box and stop Steven Jax. It's not like he's AP to take over a game and be the sole producer on offense.[/quote]

Is this stick a fork in the Falcons or the Skins? The Skins defense or lack there of has been the problem. There's also the obvious questions about the offense (i.e. the running game). there has been huge regression from last year. With the defensive emphasis on stopping the RO the skins have no run game, and the defense is abysmal. Which really means that they need to develop a pro passing game (the pro passing game does not rely on run fakes).