![]() |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
Denver has all of its chips at the center of the table.
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1063235]This usually doesnt work and I dont think it will with the Broncos.[/quote]
Look at last year's team. The best offense ever and where did the team fall short? Defense. Talib, Ward, Ware and possibly Jared Allen should fix that defense. Plus, addition by subtraction with Bailey and Rodgers-Cromartie leaving. |
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1063235]This usually doesnt work and I dont think it will with the Broncos.[/QUOTE]
Who remembers the Eagle's "Dream Team"? |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
I do think the Broncos are in good shape to make a run at a dream team style approach (unlike the Eagles that year). They know they have 2 years at most with Manning, after that, it will be a rookie or other replacement qb and Manning's cap number comes off the books. A lot depends on making sure they don't screw up the numbers, but if you got the cap space and Manning for 2 years, #winnow.
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Monkeydad;1063247]Look at last year's team. The best offense ever and where did the team fall short? Defense. Talib, Ward, Ware and possibly Jared Allen should fix that defense.
Plus, addition by subtraction with Bailey and Rodgers-Cromartie leaving.[/quote] 8 points in the big game. Talib, Ward, Ware, Allen and no Decker help that? |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Kindoy;1063255]8 points in the big game. Talib, Ward, Ware, Allen and no Decker help that?[/quote]
No, but they do help with the 43 point part. |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Kindoy;1063255]8 points in the big game. Talib, Ward, Ware, Allen and no Decker help that?[/quote]
That game was an anomaly offensively. Every other game, the offense had no problems scoring points. What they're doing is trying to match the champs' defensive talent...forget that, they're shooting to exceed it. |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Monkeydad;1063266]That game was an [B]anomaly[/B] offensively. Every other game, the offense had no problems scoring points. What they're doing is trying to match the champs' defensive talent...forget that, they're shooting to exceed it.[/quote]
Really? So Seattle had nothing to do with that? complete bs. |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1063275]Really? So Seattle had nothing to do with that? complete bs.[/quote]
Who said that? I said the offensive performance was an anomaly. Complete bs indeed. |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
Broncos now targeting Steve Smith and Sproiles?? Wow must be nice
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
Revis released.
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=artmonkforhallofamein07;1063294]Broncos now targeting Steve Smith and Sproiles?? Wow must be nice[/quote]
How it's just getting laughable! I guess everyone wants to play with Peyton. [B]Golden Tate just signed with Detroit for 5 years.[/B] |
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
Oakland wants Matt Schaub.
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
Nothing nice about signing a bunch of 30+ vets and buying a championship. Just ask the Skins of 02-10
|
Re: NFL Free Agents Signings Thread
[quote=Bucket;1063300]Nothing nice about signing a bunch of 30+ vets and buying a championship. Just ask the Skins of 02-10[/quote]
Yeah, except this collection of vets is more accomplished that the folks we cobbled together. And they have Peyton Manning, whereas our starting QBs in 2002-2010 are not even allowed to visit the hall of fame. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.