Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[QUOTE=rocnrik;1337739]I would take Sam right now with no proven Nfl experience OVER Dak and Russell and Cousins and Carr ( with what they would cost)!and the list goes on and on … if this Kid turns out good then we can spend the money to fill in the holes ..we gotta hope we found a gem in the fifth!!![/QUOTE]

If ALL we needed was a QB, I would take Dak, Cousins, Carr and a bunch of others over Howell. However, since there are multiple position groups we have to address, I am good with moving forward with Howell so we can shore up the O-line, the back seven of the D, and maybe pay some of our own.

The Sam Howell Thread
 

I’d slow down on saying Howell is better than Dak and Cousins even with the $$ but I definitely want to see him get a shot to start


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

Never said Howell was better than any of them .. I said based on the cost to have one of them .. IS Dallas thrilled with Dak? , Cousins is exactly who we thought he was .. Wilson really helped Denver..smh ,Carr at his price ??? I stand by my statement!! We are better off right now than with Those choices BASED on what it would COST ..I can see the comments now if we lose Payne because of cap space just to bring in a overpaid vet QB that won’t work out ..Those Guys I mentioned are cap killers … now I’m all for a vet at a reasonable price to compete ..

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=rocnrik;1337742]Never said Howell was better than any of them .. I said based on the cost to have one of them .. IS Dallas thrilled with Dak? , Cousins is exactly who we thought he was .. Wilson really helped Denver..smh ,Carr at his price ??? I stand by my statement!! We are better off right now than with Those choices BASED on what it would COST ..I can see the comments now if we lose Payne because of cap space just to bring in a overpaid vet QB that won’t work out ..Those Guys I mentioned are cap killers … now I’m all for a vet at a reasonable price to compete ..[/quote]

Yeah agree with you on that, I want Jimmy G as QB2... He's a perfect backup and wont cost Carr type $$

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1337743]Yeah agree with you on that, I want Jimmy G as QB2... He's a perfect backup and wont cost Carr type $$[/quote]

Jimmy G. will be a starter somewhere next year. There aren't 32 other QBs better than him.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1337741]I’d slow down on saying Howell is better than Dak and Cousins even with the $$ but I definitely want to see him get a shot to start


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

The Sam Howell hype around here is hilarious.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

Hope springs eternal...

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1337743]Yeah agree with you on that, I want Jimmy G as QB2... He's a perfect backup and wont cost Carr type $$[/quote]

Jimmy G will get starter money somewhere - north of $35M per year for sure.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1337743]Yeah agree with you on that, I want Jimmy G as QB2... He's a perfect backup and wont cost Carr type $$[/quote]

jimmy g>>>>>>> howell

until proven otherwise

i seriously count that last game of the season to the level of a pre season game, DAL gave zero shits about that game, exactly zero

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1337743]Yeah agree with you on that, I want Jimmy G as QB2... He's a perfect backup and wont cost Carr type $$[/quote]

jimmy g>>>>>>> howell

until proven otherwise

i seriously count that last game of the season to the level of a pre season game, DAL gave zero shits about that game, exactly zero

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

I don't love Jimmy G. but he would definitely be an upgrade over Wentz/Heinicke. Likely Howell too, but the verdict is still out on how good Howell is. I am high on him. Howell vs. Jimmy G is an upside vs. proven commodity bet. I would not be mad if we signed Jimmy G. Not my preference, but I'm not getting my pitchfork out either.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

I wouldn't mind Jimmy G. He would definitely be better than anyone we've had here in a while. The problem is, what are the implications of his contract for the rest of the roster. If it prohibits the necessary upgrades needed across the O-line and for the back 7 of the defense, and doesn't allow us to get anything done with some of our own Free Agents and those a year out from being Free Agents, then we're right back where we were bringing Wentz in.

This team is not just a QB away. I think it's close, but we're not there yet.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=mredskins;1337751]jimmy g>>>>>>> howell

until proven otherwise

i seriously count that last game of the season to the level of a pre season game, [B]DAL gave zero shits about that game, exactly zero[/B][/quote]

I don't believe that. If I remember correctly, the original plans was for Cowboys to rest the starters by 2nd half (or maybe before that) but they ended up keep them in the game because they couldn't score on us. That sure doesn't seem like they didn't care.

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1337761]I don't believe that. If I remember correctly, the original plans was for Cowboys to rest the starters by 2nd half (or maybe before that) but they ended up keep them in the game because they couldn't score on us. That sure doesn't seem like they didn't care.[/quote]

ok lets say they couldn't score on us then how does that have anything to do with howells performance.

all that win did was cost us the 10th pic

Re: The Sam Howell Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1337761]I don't believe that. If I remember correctly, the original plans was for Cowboys to rest the starters by 2nd half (or maybe before that) but they ended up keep them in the game because they couldn't score on us. That sure doesn't seem like they didn't care.[/quote]

Yeah, the Cowpukes were playing for the #1 seed during the first half, and we completely outplayed them.