Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Day 2, rds 2 & 3. (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=36266)

Dirtbag59 04-23-2010 09:24 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=cdskins26;693481]why has campbell fallen so far? and can he play right tackle?[/quote]

Teams are mistaking him for Jason Campbell.

vallin21 04-23-2010 09:24 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=Ruhskins;693469]So if Bruce Campbell falls to us in the 4th round, do we take him?[/quote]

I think we have to. He gives us good value and [B]will[/B] be motivated by all of the teams that passed on him earlier. If we get him, it's a good chance he's our opening day RT

tootergray34 04-23-2010 09:25 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=cdskins26;693481]why has campbell fallen so far? and can he play right tackle?[/quote]

who knows...but i highly doubt that he'll fall to us

tryfuhl 04-23-2010 09:27 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=tootergray34;693473]hells to the f'n yes dude...SOLID!

a workout warrior, some had him projected in the friggin first round![/quote]
apparently all of this is what's holding him back
[quote]"It's the mental that will get him," said one personnel director who has been in interviews with Campbell. "When he's talking he's not a quick thinker. He's a slow process, a very slow process guy. Somebody will have to tell him what to do all the time."

Another evaluator said Campbell had a "neurological slowness that's extremely scary."

At the combine, Campbell said he grew up in the "ghettos" of New Haven, Conn. After spending 2006 at Hargrave (Va.) Military Academy, he was able to enroll at Maryland.

The Terps' coaching staff took its time with Campbell, playing him in just five games in 2007 and starting him only after another player was injured in mid-2008.

Campbell's incredible workout was the talk of the combine. One scout, however, labeled that as "inconsequential" when compared to what he described as Campbell's "awful" play on tape and the 15-minute interviews he did with team after team in Indianapolis.

"He might be the most phenomenal physical specimen I've ever seen," one longtime scout said. "But he can't conceptualize."[/quote]

[url=http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/21006690]Al Davis: Buyer Beware, Bruce Campbell - CBSSports.com Message Boards[/url]

4th round RT possibility? sure why not?

itvnetop 04-23-2010 09:31 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
If we can grab Joe McKnight in the 4th, I think we'd have that explosive game-changer in the backfield.

Gtothearry 04-23-2010 09:31 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
I keep waiting for his name to pop up but hoping he drops to us.

tootergray34 04-23-2010 09:33 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
WOW good call on Joe McKnight

tryfuhl 04-23-2010 09:34 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=itvnetop;693489]If we can grab Joe McKnight in the 4th, I think we'd have that explosive game-changer in the backfield.[/quote]
I wouldn't mind that move.. I mean having Portis, Parker, AND Johnson.. not to mention Alridge seems like we're set at RB, but youth aside from Alridge and Torain would be okay.. not expecting it but who knows.. pretty much guaranteed a roster spot if we pick him though

tryfuhl 04-23-2010 09:35 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
McCoy to the Browns

tryfuhl 04-23-2010 09:35 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
right after the Bengals pick Shipley nonetheless

cdskins26 04-23-2010 09:37 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=tryfuhl;693494]McCoy to the Browns[/quote]

Notice the disappointment on his face. Nobody wants to go to Cleveland/Oakland/Detroit.

GusFrerotte 04-23-2010 09:38 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
Drafting a RB would be moronic. We need another lineman or two and a LB. RB would be a waste.

Pocket$ $traight 04-23-2010 09:38 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=CRedskinsRule;692945]Are you saying to trade AH for a 5th or later?[/quote]


Lol. Hopefully Shanahan's comments will finally shut up Andy Polin and the delusional fans who honestly believe the Redskins would be better off without Haynesworth.

I cannot remember a player who has produced more ridiculous trade scenarios.

Let's think about players the Redskins gave a 3rd rounder (or more) for:

A washed up Mark Brunell
A worthless/misused Brandon Lloyd
TJ "Mr. Inactive" Duckett

And people who claim to follow football closely really think it is a good move to dump "the most dominating player in the league" (voted by the players) for a third rounder or lower?

Let me make this final point. People floated an idea that Chris Cooley could get a first or second. Albert Haynesworth is so much better than Cooley it is pathetic. Albert may not have a blog, an annoying brother, and work for ocho cinco but between the lines, Al is light years ahead. So let's officially put this idiotic idea to bed.

itvnetop 04-23-2010 09:40 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
[quote=GusFrerotte;693499]Drafting a RB would be moronic. We need another lineman or two and a LB. RB would be a waste.[/quote]

Yes, b/c the 4th round isn't ever about value... considering how old our rb's are.

:rolleyes:

Paintrain 04-23-2010 09:40 PM

Re: Day 2, rds 2 & 3.
 
Should we think about making a move into the late third and pick up Bruce Campbell as our RT of the future?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.41383 seconds with 9 queries