Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Alvin Walton;1140672]Three years in a row with over a 1,000 yards a season including one season with 23 TDs which was his best year ever.....????

Dafuq.......[/quote]


see post #143

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

Eli might not be Tom, but yet he beat him twice in the SB.

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;1140687]Eli might not be Tom, but yet he beat him twice in the SB.[/quote]

More like the Giants defense beat the Pats offense, and the Giants offense did just enough not to lose the game.

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Giantone;1140685]see post #143[/quote]

That was obviously a typo on someone else's part
And you dont know squat about football.
Keep backpedaling and enjoy your fail fantasy roster.
:doh:

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Alvin Walton;1140691]That was obviously a typo on someone else's part
And you dont know squat about football.
Keep backpedaling and enjoy your fail fantasy roster.
:doh:[/quote]

LOL, yeah ok .Have a nice day.:)

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

Alright, back to NFL free agency. Denver is screwing things up in my opinion. I think they should probably suck it up and pay Fitzpatrick. Not a whole lot of options at the QB position.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Ruhskins;1140713]Alright, back to NFL free agency. Denver is screwing things up in my opinion. I think they should probably suck it up and pay Fitzpatrick. Not a whole lot of options at the QB position.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]


I agree yet with the amount of defections they have on D I don't think this will matter.Elway put it all in this year so I think he had to know this was possible.

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Ruhskins;1140713]Alright, back to NFL free agency. Denver is screwing things up in my opinion. I think they should probably suck it up and pay Fitzpatrick. Not a whole lot of options at the QB position.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk[/quote]

the jets offered fitz 7m/year, he apparently wants 14m+... how many years do you want to tie yourself to a 33 year old QB that's been inconsistent? and do you really want to shell out over 14m+ a year and a ton of guaranteed money for what could potentially be your backup QB?

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[QUOTE=Giantone;1140715]I agree yet with the amount of defections they have on D I don't think this will matter.Elway put it all in this year so I think he had to know this was possible.[/QUOTE]
Denver's defense still has a lot of talent. They won't have the elite defense that can carry a game, but still a very good one. It won't matter though, if they end up with Sanchez or Hoyer at QB.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=That Guy;1140716]the jets offered fitz 7m/year, he apparently wants 14m+... how many years do you want to tie yourself to a 33 year old QB that's been inconsistent? and do you really want to shell out over 14m+ a year and a ton of guaranteed money for what could potentially be your backup QB?[/quote]

The thing is what's the going rate for an nfl starter? It's either extremely low on a rookie deal or its 15 million plus.

Fitz has the right idea IMO, he was extremely good last year

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Chico23231;1140719]The thing is what's the going rate for an nfl starter? It's either extremely low on a rookie deal or its 15 million plus.

Fitz has the right idea IMO, he was extremely good last year[/quote]

but he's 33 and his track record overall is very... underwhelming. we've seen people try to pickup QBs before based on one good year, and it hasn't worked out well (cassel, foles). they'd also be bringing him in to compete, not to be the locked #1.

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

NE DT Akiem Hicks to the Bears - 2 year contract

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=That Guy;1140723]but he's 33 and his track record overall is very... underwhelming. we've seen people try to pickup QBs before based on one good year, and it hasn't worked out well (cassel, foles). they'd also be bringing him in to compete, not to be the locked #1.[/quote]

I understand it from both sides.surely Fitz feels like he can cash in...and with the money being tossed around..it generally seems like a legit negotiation because he is clearly the best qb in free agency right now. The draft class, none of those guys are ready to lead a team into the playoffs, most likely to a 10 loss season.

I think Fitz could easily lead the Broncos into the playoffs

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

Denver is really showing some fiscal responsibility. However when it comes to your QB, that's the one position where you might have to overpay. Trading for Sanchez? Possibly trying to trade for Kap? Low balling Fitz? Guess Elway doesn't think much of Griffin. They went from SB contenders to a 7 or 8 win team.

Re: NFL Free Agency 2016
 

[quote=Chico23231;1140725]I understand it from both sides.surely Fitz feels like he can cash in...and with the money being tossed around..it generally seems like a legit negotiation because he is clearly the best qb in free agency right now. The draft class, none of those guys are ready to lead a team into the playoffs, most likely to a 10 loss season.

I think Fitz could easily lead the Broncos into the playoffs[/quote]

I agree, Fitz is clearly the best guy out there. A middle of the pack starter last year just hit the market and Denver is still low balling. Sanchez is fucking terrible and Denver gave up a draft pick for that scrub.