Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

Hey! how come we don't have a poll on this yet?

Archuleta
Rogers
Springs
Rumph
Wright
Someone on D-line
Someone on the offense

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

Ummmmm, Jansen did talk to a reporter earlier this year about steroid use in the NFL, so could it have been him?




J/K

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

[quote=724Skinsfan;251443]If we're sticking with the assumption that it was someone from the secondary then I'm thinking AA. Actually, I want it to be AA so we have an even better excuse to cut him regardless of salary cap woes that will come about. That dude had one job yesterday: protecting the punter. That's it! The only thing he needed to concentrate on the whole week was how to protect the punt from getting blocked. He even f*cked that up. He doesn't want to be here.[/quote]


It works for me. Let's blame it on him. It's a shame they couldn't use it to void his contract. Maybe we could all swear in an affidavit that he plays basketball with us in the offseason or rides in our motorcycle club. There must be some way to get out from under that deal.

I still say it was actually Rumph, though.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

Why not blame Brunell?? ;)

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;251514]Why not blame Brunell?? ;)[/QUOTE]

I think you're on to something there, Matty. He's been here for awhile, he's been benched, he probably doesn't like the fact that Williams uses the F word and dances, and he can't throw the ball more than 15 yards down field. It must be him!!!!

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;251517]I think you're on to something there, Matty. He's been here for awhile, he's been benched, he probably doesn't like the fact that Williams uses the F word and dances, and he can't throw the ball more than 15 yards down field. It must be him!!!![/quote]

Could be Ramsey too.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;251519]Could be Ramsey too.[/QUOTE]

Now that's just crazy talk. You and I both know he's taken too damn many shots to the head to be able to come up with that kind of in depth analysis.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

The comments they posted on Comcast Sportsnet suggest to me that it was someone who has been on the team for a while.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

I think Gregg Williams did it as a motivational ploy to rally the troops.

He knew that the veterans would be ticked off and would pull together.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

Brunell told me, he thought JC, and Ramsey started it?

Actually, it sounds to me that the author has a bit of an axe to grind with Joe.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

Good god! It was Joe Gibbs. Tom Friend did cover the Redskins during his first tenure. I'm sure a relationship did develop between the two. Gibbs is the master motivator. My vote has been changed to Coach Gibbs.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

I think it was Danny Smith, because Gregg Williams told him that having an entire pack of Big League Chew in his mouth during a game made him look like a fool. He was also mad because Williams told him that Novak is really a good kicker.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

You are all barking up the wrong tree. It was Pastabelly - He called friend and said he was archuleta.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;251552]You are all barking up the wrong tree. It was Pastabelly - He called friend and said he was archuleta.[/quote]

Hmm, good one. I wonder if AA ever lit up Todd Pinkston as he was laying out for a pass up the middle. That would be prime motive for Pastabelly to frame AA. I think there was/is a special relationship between Pastabelly and Pinkston. Their offspring would be hatch and be called a Pinkbelly.

Re: Must-Read Article on GW and the Defense
 

they said player. i'd vote with czab and go with springs. the quotes sounds like him. arch talks a bit differently. springs was rushed back onto the field and he's the most talkative guy on the team... he also had the best memory of what was said and softened and deflected those quotes at length (compared to anyone else). arch has been adamant about saying "no comment" so i doubt it's him... he also wasn't here before this year to know about the backstory with pierce et al. It has to be springs.