Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Paul
Banks- If healthy, keep him as a return specialist, carry 2 QB's to create a position for him. If not healthy and it would not surprise me if he is put on IR for the year.

I would love to keep all 7.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

If Banks goes to IR (hope not), do they keep Stallworth as a 6th wr or go w/5?

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Oh man, I love Austin. This guy is for real unlike our post scrub preseason wr heros. He just might be worthy of the #3 wr spot.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=Mattyk;827897]He can't start on PUP. He would have needed to be on there at the start of camp.[/quote]


Damn, I didnt realize.

I dint think Stallworth would do anything when we signed him but hes really impressed me. Stallworth is a guy who could be the number 3 reciever on the team and Banks cant be in my eyes. If theres ever a injury or suspension issue at WR i think Stallworth would be better suited to step in and contribute then Banks.

I agree that Banks is at least a solid notch above Austin in his return skills, particularly in his KO returns. I guess it all comes down to coaches thinking that hell be healthy enough to play each week...

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

#1 Moss
#2 Gaffney
#3 Armstrong
#4 Austin
#5 Stallworth
#6 Hankerson

Practice Squad:
Paul, Robinson

Banks is making the team as a Special Teamer much like our punter and kicker.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=mooby;827938]I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.[/quote]

I believe you're thinking of James Davis who had the choice of joining our practice squad, and I believe Indy's, but chose ours in large part because of the system..which apparently kept him down and led to his release

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=saden1;827919]#1 Moss
#2 Gaffney
#3 Armstrong
#4 Austin
#5 Stallworth
#6 Hankerson

Practice Squad:
Paul, Robinson

Banks is making the team as a Special Teamer much like our punter and kicker.[/quote]

this seems to make the most sense, that's still a lot of "WR" spots though. I don't think they'd keep that many on the 53 AND 2 on the PS. i don't think robinson makes it.

daniels, sellers, and banks would be nice people to find a spot for. daniels in jarvis, banks in clemons spot, and sellers instead of the 9th OL or whatever since we don't have enough quality bodies yet to justify roster space.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=mooby;827938]I think at this point it will be

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
Banks

Paul and/or Robinson to the PS. Also once Paul is on the PS, can't he decline an offer to join another team? I've heard of that happening before, like last year with some rb on our practice squad who wanted to stay because of Shanny's system. Not saying it won't happen with Paul but you never know.[/quote]

active roster pays 3-5x more than the practice squad, so...

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=That Guy;827943]active roster pays 3-5x more than the practice squad, so...[/quote]

So maybe if he wants more money he joins an active roster elsewhere, but it's not uncommon for ps players to decline spots on other teams' rosters if they feel more comfortable with where they're at. Either way we'll see, I'm just happy that we have this problem to begin with.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=SmootSmack;827941]I believe you're thinking of James Davis who had the choice of joining our practice squad, and I believe Indy's, but chose ours in large part because of the system..which apparently kept him down and led to his release[/quote]

I believe you're right. Funny how that worked out. And technically he's not released yet, we still own his rights just in case he does decide to come back (which will probably lead to his release).

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

I think he actually did finally get released

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
--------------
Stallworth - If we cut Clemmens, then we could possibly keep Stallworth as a 6th?
Paul - PS
Banks - PS
Robinson - PS

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=SmootSmack;827950]I think he actually did finally get released[/quote]

Oh. Well then I guess I am mistaken.

Re: Redskins Receivers Rotation
 

[quote=Bucket;827953]Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
--------------
Stallworth - If we cut Clemmens, then we could possibly keep Stallworth as a 6th?
Paul - PS
Banks - PS
Robinson - PS[/quote]

No way Banks lands on the PS. It's either active roster or another team for him.