Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Build the Redskins for 2012 (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=45183)

skinsfaninok 11-16-2011 02:28 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SBXVII;860109]I'm not a college fan so I'm guessing he's got another year of college or more?[/quote]

red shirt jr

SBXVII 11-16-2011 03:26 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;860120]red shirt jr[/quote]

Ok this is where I show how smart I am. lol. NOT. I don't get the whole "red shirt" stuff. I know, I know. Poke fun all you want I can take it. Atleast I hope. lol.

[quote]
The term [B]redshirt freshman[/B] indicates an academic [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore"][COLOR=#0000ff]sophomore[/COLOR][/URL] (second-year student) who is in his first season of athletic eligibility. A redshirt freshman is distinguished from a true freshman (first-year student) as one who has practiced with the team for the prior season. The term [B]redshirt sophomore[/B] is also commonly used to indicate an academic [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior"][COLOR=#0000ff]junior[/COLOR][/URL] (third-year student) who is in the second season of athletic eligibility. After the sophomore year, the term redshirt is rarely used, in favor of [B]fourth-year junior[/B] and fifth-year [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior"][COLOR=#0000ff]senior[/COLOR][/URL].
[/quote]

So if I'm reading this are you saying he's in his fourth-year of school but is considered a Junior because of being red shirted?

SmootSmack 11-16-2011 03:39 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;860118]Great fit for KS's system, quick reads, high accuracy is a must. Guy has both, no question...if only he cracked 5' 10".[/quote]

Kellen Moore has that and cracks 5'10"...barely

Slingin Sammy 33 11-16-2011 03:46 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SmootSmack;860146]Kellen Moore has that and cracks 5'10"...barely[/quote]Between Moore & Chase, I'd get Chase if he goes FA. I don't know what his contract status is. No problem with a 4th or so on Moore.

SmootSmack 11-16-2011 04:54 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=Slingin Sammy 33;860149]Between Moore & Chase, I'd get Chase if he goes FA. I don't know what his contract status is. No problem with a 4th or so on Moore.[/quote]

He's a restricted free agent. Saints have no intention of letting him go. But he could start here

Slingin Sammy 33 11-16-2011 05:12 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SmootSmack;860157]He's a restricted free agent. Saints have no intention of letting him go. [B]But he could start here[/B][/quote]Agree.

SirClintonPortis 11-16-2011 06:17 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SmootSmack;860157]He's a restricted free agent. Saints have no intention of letting him go. But he could start here[/quote]

I'd love to give him a try again. He looked like he had much promise during that preseason. Far more than Rex or Beck.

redskin37 11-16-2011 07:31 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
All we can hope for is 3 - 13 and a good drat and free agent period.

SmootSmack 11-16-2011 08:13 PM

[QUOTE=SirClintonPortis;860169]I'd love to give him a try again. He looked like he had much promise during that preseason. Far more than Rex or Beck.[/QUOTE]

He's arguably my favorite Redskin of the past five years.

Maybe the Saints will spend so much on keeping Brees that they'll have to let Chase go.

EARTHQUAKE2689 11-16-2011 08:32 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;860111]they have Blackmon at 2, wheres my boy Quake now?[/quote]

Right here and I stand by it still.

IrMitchell 11-16-2011 09:36 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SmootSmack;860177]He's arguably my favorite Redskin of the past five years.

Maybe the Saints will spend so much on keeping Brees that they'll have to let Chase go.[/quote]

I wouldn't be against this at all, but let's not forget that we were optimistic of John Beck and Rex Grossman this year. Should we really go that route again?

SOUL-SKINS 11-16-2011 09:45 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=IrMitchell;860184]I wouldn't be against this at all, but let's not forget that we were optimistic of John Beck and Rex Grossman this year. Should we really go that route again?[/quote]

Ummm I don't think any of us we're optimistic at all my friend ..... If anything we were 100% against it.... But had no other real options

SirClintonPortis 11-16-2011 09:45 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=IrMitchell;860184]I wouldn't be against this at all, but let's not forget that we were optimistic of John Beck and Rex Grossman this year. Should we really go that route again?[/quote]

While John Beck and Rex Grossman are on the last of their 9 lives here and would have been dead if we weren't interested in them, Chase Daniel has spent the past few years solidifying his status as Drew Brees' backup in New Orleans. He did not fail here. We just cut him because the personnel guys wanted to keep Colt Brennan just like they kept Betts and Carwright: competition does not exist in Vinny-land.

We looked at Brecks because they had potential upside, not because they were sure to produce concrete results. Chase Daniel has far more upside than either.

IrMitchell 11-16-2011 09:47 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SOUL-SKINS;860185]Ummm I don't think any of us we're optimistic at all my friend ..... If anything we were 100% against it.... But had no other real options[/quote]

Haha, I'd love to agree with you.. But I would say more than half of us around here were drinking the Rex and Beck-aid. Shanahan was very insistent that these guys were more than capable.

IrMitchell 11-16-2011 09:50 PM

Re: Build the Redskins for 2012
 
[quote=SirClintonPortis;860186]While John Beck and Rex Grossman are on the last of their 9 lives here and would have been dead if we weren't interested in them, Chase Daniel has spent the past few years solidifying his status as Drew Brees' backup in New Orleans. He did not fail here. We just cut him because the personnel guys wanted to keep Colt Brennan just like they kept Betts and Carwright: competition does not exist in Vinny-land.

We looked at Brecks because they had potential upside, not because they were sure to produce concrete results. Chase Daniel has far more upside than either.[/quote]

Ok, so if we have a chance to draft a Matt Barkley or Landry Jones, who both have undeniable upside compared to Daniels, would you do it? Or would you prefer a Blackmon/Jeffrey + Daniels combo..

I would definitely have to think long and hard.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.61884 seconds with 9 queries