Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury) (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=32035)

SFREDSKIN 09-22-2009 12:57 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;593556]Why wouldn't the Redskins re-sign Boston Pete at this point?[/quote]

Only way would be as a backup.

SmootSmack 09-22-2009 01:00 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;593556]Why wouldn't the Redskins re-sign Boston Pete at this point?

How could it hurt? Give Reinhart a shot but having a back-up plan is never a bad idea.[/quote]

Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?

Pocket$ $traight 09-22-2009 01:01 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=SmootSmack;593600]Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?[/quote]

Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.

JoeRedskin 09-22-2009 01:02 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[QUOTE=SmootSmack;593600]Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?[/QUOTE]

I agree. Reinhardt starts with Montgomery backing him up. Do you sign Kendall just to have him sit inactive? We actually have homegrown talent, lets use it.

JoeRedskin 09-22-2009 01:03 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;593602]Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. [B]He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.[/B][/quote]

Uh oh... you just opened up a whole other can of crazy - why'd you have to go and stir that pot.

SFREDSKIN 09-22-2009 01:06 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
Once Thomas goes on IR they still need to fill his roster spot. I don't care if Kendall is inactive, he's just insurance.

SmootSmack 09-22-2009 01:14 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=Pocket$ $traight;593602]Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.[/quote]

But he can play teams, particularly on a day like Sunday when Smoot and Barnes (two other guys who play teams) were both inactive. Barnes may have been week 1 as well (can't remember)

Kendall won't be playing teams

mlmpetert 09-22-2009 01:31 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
Anyone else really worried that a decision still hasnt been made?

PennSkinsFan 09-22-2009 01:33 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
Here is our annual Offensive Line rant, just coming a bit early this year.

[URL="http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html"][B]http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html[/B][/URL]

Monkeydad 09-22-2009 01:43 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=mlmpetert;593629]Anyone else really worried that a decision still hasnt been made?[/quote]

It has. Chad Rhinehart is starting.

SFREDSKIN 09-22-2009 01:46 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=PennSkinsFan;593630]Here is our annual Offensive Line rant, just coming a bit early this year.

[URL="http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html"][B]http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html[/B][/URL][/quote]

Couldn't agree more, that's why Mack should have been drafted by us.

Skinny Tee 09-22-2009 01:56 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
I'm hearing that Armstrong is going to start.

I'd say that makes sense being that C. Reinhardt wasn't even dressed this past SUN. If Chad is considered the backup wouldn't he at least dressed for the Rams game.

MTK 09-22-2009 02:01 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
Who the F is Armstrong??

I feel like a broken record but there's a perfectly logical reason as to why Rinehart has been inactive. He only plays guard where as someone like Montgomery can fill in at guard and center.

PennSkinsFan 09-22-2009 02:03 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
[quote=Mattyk72;593649]Who the F is Armstrong??

I feel like a broken record but there's a perfectly logical reason as to why Rinehart has been inactive. He only plays guard where as someone like Montgomery can fill in at guard and center.[/quote]

Lmao. Never heard of Armstrong. I she talking about Montgomery? And if he is, that's not even close.

T.O.Killa 09-22-2009 02:03 PM

Re: Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)
 
Wow the Redskins insiders are always so hard on the front office. I think his assesment of the Oline is a little to harsh. They have not been that bad. They gave up two sacks to the most fierce pass rush in the NFL. Heyer has been decent, and I expect him to continue to get better. Anyway here is the story.
[url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/jason-reid/play-calling-isnt-the-only-pro.html#more]Redskins Insider - Play-Calling Isn't the Only Problem[/url]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.39989 seconds with 9 queries