Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=SkinsGuru;1167756]he ran a 4:38 at the combine . . . .03 slower than Desean Jackson[/quote]

4 hours and 38 minutes is a pretty long 40 yard dash.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;1167755]That would definitely shock me[/QUOTE]
He got 77 with shitty qbs. Plus we are a pass first team

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

I want benie fucking Logan, this would be our best move if we can pull it off.

Keim saying saying skins could take a look at Hankins dt if Logan doesn't work out. Has heard Hankins name mentioned

[url]http://www.bigblueview.com/2017/3/10/14883644/nfl-free-agency-2017-ny-giants-rumors-news-johnathan-hankins-eagles-cardinals-broncos-browns[/url]

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1167774]He got 77 with shitty qbs. Plus we are a pass first team[/quote]

He also had no receiving help so all passes went to him basically.

I see him going for something like 65-70 receptions 800-900 yards and 6-9 TDs

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=Chico23231;1167775]I want benie fucking Logan, this would be our best move if we can pull it off.

Keim saying saying skins could take a look at Hankins dt if Logan doesn't work out. Has heard Hankins name mentioned

[url]http://www.bigblueview.com/2017/3/10/14883644/nfl-free-agency-2017-ny-giants-rumors-news-johnathan-hankins-eagles-cardinals-broncos-browns[/url][/quote]

Echo this.

Logan is very good against the run and in my opinion would be the best of the then-three linemen we acquired. And it would genuinely hurt the Eagles. Fletcher Cox is a great player, but the presence of Logan on that line ensures that offensive lines can't just double team Cox all day. If Logan leaves, now they can, and Cox's life gets way harder. Beau Allen is not a good replacement for Bennie Logan.

Sounds like Logan was expecting a better market. Fine give him one year like we did with Pryor. I love the prove it deal, nothing keeps a player hungry quite like a free agent feeding frenzy.

Hankins would be a good consolation prize.

But Bennie. One year $6M. Do it!

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/football-insider/wp/2017/03/10/what-to-make-of-newly-acquired-redskins-defensive-linemen-terrell-mcclain-stacy-mcgee/"]What to make of newly acquired Redskins defensive linemen Terrell McClain, Stacy McGee[/URL]

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

I love the Pryor signing. Great FA move. Low risk, high reward. No way could the Redskins pay Garcon and Jackson the money they're getting.

Now if they could get Logan, plus draft some more studs, get some luck with Galette...we're on our way.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

I like the Pryor signing.

He's older then I would like for a player still learning their position but he's was very productive in his first year. He got a ton of targets and that's primarily what receivers need to get production. So I question how much of his production was based on volume?

But I like his physical skillset which is ideal for a receiver, he profiles very similarly to Julio Jones. There is still upside if he expands his route tree and sharpens his route running. He's not 'quick' but there are several ways an offense could make good use of his speed and size.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=Chico23231;1167775]...Keim saying saying skins could take a look at Hankins dt if Logan doesn't work out. Has heard Hankins name mentioned[/quote]Don't tease me. Hankins would make all these other DL moves bearable.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=MTK;1167781][URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/football-insider/wp/2017/03/10/what-to-make-of-newly-acquired-redskins-defensive-linemen-terrell-mcclain-stacy-mcgee/"]What to make of newly acquired Redskins defensive linemen Terrell McClain, Stacy McGee[/URL][/quote]

Good article...these guys seem like lunch pail, do the dirty work and more importantly, "you know your role and excel at it" type signings. Backbone of a defense. I like it. But I think Stacy will be a d-end, he won't sniff the nose spot..he will kick down in the nickel and be effective.

Benie Logan will play more of the disruptive force if we can land him.

These moves are all about improving the run defense. Great approach and makes perfect sense from last year. At least the fo is making sense in free agency and seem to have a plan.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

Imho getting rid of Baker for these guys isn't improvement.

Its creating a hole and filling it with lesser players.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=30gut;1167788]Imho getting rid of Baker for these guys isn't improvement.

Its creating a hole and filling it with lesser players.[/quote]

I think Chris Baker is better than either of the guys but they didn't want Baker for some reason, so that is that. Baker was a starter for us. What if these guys aren't expected to be starters as we obtain more talent in FA and the draft? The question then becomes "are they better than Ricky Jean, Ziggy, etc".

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

[quote=Chico23231;1167775]I want benie fucking Logan, this would be our best move if we can pull it off.

Keim saying saying skins could take a look at Hankins dt if Logan doesn't work out. Has heard Hankins name mentioned

[url]http://www.bigblueview.com/2017/3/10/14883644/nfl-free-agency-2017-ny-giants-rumors-news-johnathan-hankins-eagles-cardinals-broncos-browns[/url][/quote]

I would be satisfied with either Logan or Hankins. I feel that we need to land one of them. I'd like to get one of them on a multi-year deal.

I suspect that their market values are down because there is such a strong DL draft class this season and not because either on of them has anything more to prove. They may think that a one-year deal works for them because next year's DL draft class isn't expected to be as strong as this year's class. But a multi-year deal definitely works for us because these guys are good young NFL players.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

McGee is rated as Baker's equal by PFF. If you don't like PFF fine, but you can't deny he was a big part of the DL rotation on a very good Raider defense. I don't think we lose anything going from Baker to McGee, personally.

On McClain it does feel to me like we overpaid for a journeyman. But he does penetrate well.

I want Logan bad, he's better than Baker.

Re: Redskins Free Agent Signings
 

If you take off your burgundy colored glasses, you have to acknowledge that while Baker was our best lineman he was still pretty inconsistent.