![]() |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
Want: a franchise qb who leads the team for the next 10+ years to multiple playoffs and SB appearances
Reality: Washington continues it's forever qb challenge, either by picking wrong, or injury ends potential franchise qb career in the last home game at the former FedEx field Some suffer from PDSD (Post Dan Snyder Disorder) I suffer from QB Anxiety Attacks also: Want - Penix and a boatload of picks don't want - Maye / McCarthy Reality - Daniels Also Reality - Whoever this guru team of QB whisperers choose, I will be watching those same YouTube vids as SDskins |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1361089]Penix will probably be the guy everyone says “of course we should have drafted him, what were we thinking”
I don’t know the answer too who we should or shouldn’t draft, but damn if there isn’t a good group of talented guys sitting there. We got some quality options. My best guess is outside of Caleb…it’s between Daniels or Penix. I think for Peters it’s between JJ and Daniels.[/quote] Love Penix. He's just always injured. "The best ability is availability" - Parcells |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=jamf;1361092]Love Penix. He's just always injured.
"The best ability is availability" - Parcells[/quote] He was fully available for the last 2 years. Clearly recovered relatively quickly from potential career ending injuries. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
I’ll say this, Caleb Williams is far from a sure thing and the Chicago org…if he and that team comes out flat it’s over for the coach. It could be another reset in for the Bears.
That org has underperformed given the decent roster the last several years |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1361089]Penix will probably be the guy everyone says “of course we should have drafted him, what were we thinking”
I don’t know the answer too who we should or shouldn’t draft, but damn if there isn’t a good group of talented guys sitting there. We got some quality options. My best guess is outside of Caleb…it’s between Daniels or Penix. [B]I think for Peters it’s between JJ and Daniels.[/B][/quote] What causes you to say that? |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=KI Skins Fan;1361096]What causes you to say that?[/quote]
Things the father of JJ has said about the Commanders and their meetings. And either Standig/Keim said based on talking to some folks around the league, JJ would be the type of QB the San Fran/Peters would like. Winner. And even though JJ wasn’t asked to do a lot, when Michigan would need the QB to make a play, he would without a problem. Nothing was too big for JJ |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1361097]Things the father of JJ has said about the Commanders and their meetings.
And either Standig/Keim said based on talking to some folks around the league, JJ would be the type of QB the San Fran/Peters would like. Winner. And even though JJ wasn’t asked to do a lot, when Michigan would need the QB to make a play, he would without a problem. Nothing was too big for JJ[/quote] Thanks. Very interesting. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
The QB prospects in this draft are nice and there are more than usual.
However none of that means squat if they are not playing in front of a capable O-Line that can generate a running game and pass protect. Seeing teams like Detroit, Ravens and 49'ers offensive lines play physical football is refreshing compared to all of the pass happy crap now a days. After Shanahan was canned we became a soft pussy offense. I'm tired of that shit. We need to punch defenses in the mouth. We need balance in our attack. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[QUOTE=Defensewins;1361104]The QB prospects in this draft are nice and there are more than usual.
However none of that means squat if they are not playing in front of a capable O-Line that can generate a running game and pass protect. Seeing teams like Detroit, Ravens and 49'ers offensive lines play physical football is refreshing compared to all of the pass happy crap now a days. After Shanahan was canned we became a soft pussy offense. I'm tired of that shit. We need to punch defenses in the mouth. We need balance in our attack.[/QUOTE]I expect we will see several O-Line players drafted early on day 2 and probably move back up to 12- 16 to get a premier tackle Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Defensewins;1361104]The QB prospects in this draft are nice and there are more than usual.
However none of that means squat if they are not playing in front of a capable O-Line that can generate a running game and pass protect. Seeing teams like Detroit, Ravens and 49'ers offensive lines play physical football is refreshing compared to all of the pass happy crap now a days. After Shanahan was canned we became a soft pussy offense. I'm tired of that shit. We need to punch defenses in the mouth. We need balance in our attack.[/quote] Even last year, with that online, we were able to run the ball. We just didn't. We will run the ball this year, and we will be effective at it. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Defensewins;1361104]The QB prospects in this draft are nice and there are more than usual.
However none of that means squat if they are not playing in front of a capable O-Line that can generate a running game and pass protect. Seeing teams like Detroit, Ravens and 49'ers offensive lines play physical football is refreshing compared to all of the pass happy crap now a days. After Shanahan was canned we became a soft pussy offense. I'm tired of that shit. We need to punch defenses in the mouth. We need balance in our attack.[/quote] Investment in the 2 new starter in the middle will be significant. I imagine we will come out the draft with another Tackle. While I like B Rob, I would continue to invest at RB. Someone who hits the hole and goes. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
There is a deep group of good tackles and guards coming out. No reason we shouldn’t walk away without Daniels (hopefully) and two olineman after day two.
|
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=punch it in;1361111]There is a deep group of good tackles and guards coming out. No reason we shouldn’t walk away without Daniels (hopefully) and two olineman after day two.[/quote]
I agree. My prediction is QB at #2 (obviously), then OL x 2, Edge, DB, and WR in the first three rounds...not necessarily in that order. |
Re: QB Prospects Thread
Time to go to Overthinkers Anonymous guys. The pick is Jayden and it’s not close.
|
Re: QB Prospects Thread
[quote=Schneed10;1361114]Time to go to Overthinkers Anonymous guys. The pick is Jayden and it’s not close.[/quote]
Most Mocks now are saying the same.. Maye to NE at 3 as well |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.