[QUOTE=tryfuhl;839344]Ummm... the same way you know about everything else thats unspoken... observation and hush hush talks...you might want to look up what it means...[/QUOTE]

He said is an unspoken rule for a QB...... is he a QB? If he's not, and its unspoken, then how does anyone except a QB know about it? You might want to look up common sense.

[URL]http://lmgtfy.com/?q=common+sense[/URL]

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=sandtrapjack;839357]He said is an unspoken rule for a QB...... is he a QB? If he's not, and its unspoken, then how does anyone except a QB know about it? You might want to look up common sense.

[url=http://lmgtfy.com/?q=common+sense]Let me google that for you[/url]

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk[/quote]

Are you seriously arguing this for the sake of arguing, or are you just ignorant of a simple meaning?

A QB TRIES TO EXPLOIT A BLITZ. ITS A NATURAL REACTION FOR A QB.

Romo spoke of it as if Hall doesn't expect the natural reaction of a QB if Hall was to blitz.

Man I tell ya, the Cowboy and Giant posters in here are really having a hard time with a competitive Redskins team this season... Crazy arguments and assumptions.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[url=http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/7018861/dallas-cowboys-tony-romo-good-go-monday-vs-washington-redskins-set-deangelo-hall-attacks]Dallas Cowboys' Tony Romo 'good to go' Monday vs. Washington Redskins, set for DeAngelo Hall's attacks - ESPN Dallas[/url]

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

late reply here but i didn't particularly dislike what Hall said, gives the 'girls one more thing to think about/be distracted over

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

LOL Justin Tuck looked like he was like.. WTF!? LOL

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

I hear a couple of Giants are up for a prestigious award this year.

[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nOhxsGWnXNA/TK0JCGt9TiI/AAAAAAAAA8c/utFVXa6FxCg/s1600/AwardOscar.jpg[/IMG]

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=Giantone;839293]...worse then that,this.....



[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmqG0k3hGPM&NR=1]Gus Frerotte headbutts wall. - YouTube[/url][/quote]

Ummm, yeah, I was in ****ing elementary school and I remember Gus not playing the next week. No faking in that headbutt, buster.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=44ever;839303]I hear they are considering the 15 yard Fainting Goat penalty.[/quote]

Huh?

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=Mattyk;839288]No assumptions involved. Doesn't take a genius to figure this one out.

[IMG]http://gif.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/FOOTBALLDIVE.gif[/IMG][/quote]

Sports Science needs to do a piece on this.

"And here Deon Grant hits the deck at an amazing 5 mph. Grant only has a 6 second window where the refs aren't watching to complete his fall. That's the same amount of time it takes a domestic economy car to accelerate from 0 to 60. We brought Deon in to reenact his fall"

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CC_9aFuEkA[/ame]


This was the film they reviewed before the game.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[url=http://bleacherreport.com/articles/862949-washington-redskins-we-hate-dallas]Washington Redskins: We Hate Dallas | Bleacher Report[/url]

This guy gets it!

The only down side is that his article fired me up and it's 3 am. I should be sleeping.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=sandtrapjack;839357] You might want to look up common sense.

[url=http://lmgtfy.com/?q=common+sense]Let me google that for you[/url]

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk[/quote]

lol....have you been reading any of the posts?

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=Giantone;839640]lol....have you been reading any of the posts?[/quote]
Ehh, for the most part...lol

I just get a chuckle when someone says "It's an unspoken rule for a QB..." as if to present themselves as some kind of "insider" who is right there in the locker room or front office when in all probability they are not.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=sandtrapjack;839662]Ehh, for the most part...lol

I just get a chuckle when someone says "It's an unspoken rule for a QB..." as if to present themselves as some kind of "insider" who is right there in the locker room or front office when in all probability they are not.[/quote]

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unspoken_rule]Unspoken rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

Unspoken rules - are behavioral constraints imposed in organizations or societies that are not voiced or written down. They usually exist in unspoken and unwritten format because they [B]form a part of [U]the logical argument or course of action[/U][/B] implied by tacit assumptions.

In this case if a QB is blitzed, the [U]logical course of action[/U] will be to try and avoid or burn the blitzer. It does not take a "insider" to know this.

Also, just in case your not "in on it", the blitzer will go after the QB. Uh Oh, I Hope I didn't just give up our secret "insider" game plan...

If you stop talking now you can save yourself some sort of credibility.

Re: D.Hall says he's targeting Romo's ribs
 

[quote=44ever;839675][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unspoken_rule]Unspoken rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

Unspoken rules - are behavioral constraints imposed in organizations or societies that are not voiced or written down. They usually exist in unspoken and unwritten format because they [B]form a part of [U]the logical argument or course of action[/U][/B] implied by tacit assumptions.

In this case if a QB is blitzed, the [U]logical course of action[/U] will be to try and avoid or burn the blitzer. It does not take a "insider" to know this.

Also, just in case your not "in on it", the blitzer will go after the QB. Uh Oh, I Hope I didn't just give up our secret "insider" game plan...

If you stop talking now you can save yourself some sort of credibility.[/quote]
Wow, unspoken QB rules for the NFL are on Wikipedia now?

What was I thinking?!?! Of course you are right. Thanks for setting things straight.