Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Campbell A Raider (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=36289)

Eknox 04-27-2010 01:17 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
Yes, I agree those picks are hard to swallow for a player that didn't fit the system we were trying to run..

Whiskeybilt 04-27-2010 01:20 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
I think JC will do well and I wish him the best.

He will be in a smaller market on a team nobody expects much from. I think that will help him.

irish 04-27-2010 01:30 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Mattyk;695558]And considering we're getting a 4th in 2012, net of 1 pick[/quote]

I think the Skins were lucky to get anything for him so that 4th pick helps.

Lotus 04-27-2010 01:34 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695530]So, are you arguing that if, for the sake of argument, we had picked JC at #25 without giving up extra picks, he would not be a bust?[/quote]

[quote=irish;695586]Pretty much yes. I think I'd call him more of a big disappointment if he was drafted 25th. Its the loss of those picks thats the real kicker. JC ended up being a marginal QB (who might not even start in Oak) who the Skins end up thrwing away for a 4th round pick.[/quote]

Then, logically, JC is not a bust to you. The trade up for him is what you are criticizing, not JC himself.

irish 04-27-2010 01:37 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695602]Then, logically, JC is not a bust to you. The trade up for him is what you are criticizing, not JC himself.[/quote]

Its the whole thing, the trade up, JC's play. Put that all together and the final result is bust.

Lotus 04-27-2010 01:52 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=irish;695604]Its the whole thing, the trade up, JC's play. Put that all together and the final result is bust.[/quote]

You are not being logical. You can't say "the whole thing" because whether JC busted his pick, or whether we should have traded up for him, are two separate issues, as your own posts have highlighted.

irish 04-27-2010 02:09 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695611]You are not being logical. You can't say "the whole thing" because whether JC busted his pick, or whether we should have traded up for him, are two separate issues, as your own posts have highlighted.[/quote]

I know they are 2 seperate things. Should they have traded up - no. Did JC bust his pick - yes. When you look at the whole saga of JC with the Skins (trade up, his play, toss him out) the final result is bust.

Lotus 04-27-2010 02:25 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=irish;695586]Pretty much yes. [B]I think I'd call him more of a big disappointment if he was drafted 25th. Its the loss of those picks thats the real kicker.[/B] JC ended up being a marginal QB (who might not even start in Oak) who the Skins end up thrwing away for a 4th round pick.[/quote]

[quote=irish;695616]I know they are 2 seperate things. Should they have traded up - no. [B]Did JC bust his pick - yes.[/B] When you look at the whole saga of JC with the Skins (trade up, his play, toss him out) the final result is bust.[/quote]

Can't have it both ways. Which is it: JC is a "bust," or JC is just a "disappointment"?

tootergray34 04-27-2010 02:28 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
good riddance...good luck..but i'm glad he isn't here anymore.

irish 04-27-2010 02:33 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695627]Can't have it both ways. Which is it: JC is a "bust," or JC is just a "disappointment"?[/quote]

Bust

Lotus 04-27-2010 02:37 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=irish;695636]Bust[/quote]

Heath Shuler did nothing and was out of the league quickly. He's a bust.

JC, while a disappointment, is a capable mid-level, non-great QB. To use the same word for him that is used for Shuler is offensive.

irish 04-27-2010 02:44 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695641]Heath Shuler did nothing and was out of the league quickly. He's a bust.

JC, while a disappointment, is a capable mid-level, non-great QB. To use the same word for him that is used for Shuler is offensive.[/quote]

Like I tried to explain but you cant seem to understand is that when you consider what was given up to get JC and his play he ends up going down as a bust. Shuler was also a bust but at leat the Skins didnt give up players to get him.

Lotus 04-27-2010 02:49 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=irish;695645][B]Like I tried to explain but you cant seem to understand[/B] is that when you consider what was given up to get JC and his play he ends up going down as a bust. Shuler was also a bust but at leat the Skins didnt give up players to get him.[/quote]

For reasons I have already mentioned, I'm not going to understand your train of thought on this issue because it lacks logical coherence.

JLee9718 04-27-2010 04:09 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
It would be interesting to see how JC could have performed with a decent O-line. Plus a decent coach! He'll get a better chance in Oakland, sad to say...

mlmdub130 04-27-2010 04:14 PM

Re: Campbell A Raider
 
[quote=Lotus;695627]Can't have it both ways. Which is it: JC is a "bust," or JC is just a "disappointment"?[/quote]

same old same old in here :doh:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.89697 seconds with 9 queries