![]() |
Re: Sean Taylor's Trial Set for Jan. 17th
[QUOTE=onlydarksets]For the same reason Jamal Lewis got to wait till the offseason to serve his 4 months. Judges love football.[/QUOTE]
I think you misread my statement. I was calling him out for saying it would NOT be continued when I would bet it probably would. |
Re: Sean Taylor's Trial Set for Jan. 17th
[QUOTE=FRPLG]I think you misread my statement. I was calling him out for saying it would NOT be continued when I would bet it probably would.[/QUOTE]
Ah, my bad! Adrenaline+beer = sloppy reader. :smashfrea |
Re: Sean Taylor's Trial Set for Jan. 17th
[QUOTE=FRPLG]How do you know it is unlikely to be continued? You a lawyer involved with the case?[/QUOTE]
The trial has already been postponed twice. Judges don't like to grant 1, 2, 3 continuances for a trial since they are supposed to wrap up cases as quickly as possible. However, if you would have read my subsequent post you would have seen that I said that the judge [I]may[/I] grant one. |
Re: Sean Taylor's Trial Set for Jan. 17th
[QUOTE=AnonEmouse]If Smith didn't miss a game for getting ejected, I can't see how they do it to Taylor. He nearly cost us the game for that stupidity (if indeed it was a deliberate act) and I think JG and GW will punish him plenty in any case. Big fine coming his way.[/QUOTE]
Fined by the league and I wouldn't be suprised to see if he's benched for the first series or so by the coaches.. |
Re: Sean Taylor's Trial Set for Jan. 17th
The ref was right there you kina have to give him the benifit of the doubt but i didnt see any visable spitting like robbie alomar but none the less that cant be good for his trial.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.