Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

SOunds from the profile that Buges and the weight room folks may be able to help him improve. We also seem to have some kind of Auburn connection. A solid backup, with game experience, and he's not too old. A good pick up.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

I hope the coaches saw something in this guy no one else did! I was looking at the roster on the OL we sure have a lot of players with little or no NFL playing time as back ups! To say we will get help in the Draft in this area may help down the road in seasons to come. But 06 I think we need some one who has something more to offer! But that is me just knowing how much we spend on the rest of the O to have it fail because we when on the cheap finding good back ups on the OL!

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

Anyone who can get some knockdowns on Freeney can't be all bad.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

OK, but what I really want to know is...

How do you pronounce his name?

Is it P-[I]yoo[/I]-SILL-o ?

Or is it [I]PYOU[/I]-sillo ?

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

Left Out

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

anyone has to be better than raymer was in the playoff game last year

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]anyone has to be better than raymer was in the playoff game last year[/QUOTE]

No doubt about that. But Jim Molinaro was active for that game. Makes you wonder what this signing, and Cory Raymer playing in the playoff game has to say about him.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[quote=Beemnseven]No doubt about that. But Jim Molinaro was active for that game. Makes you wonder what this signing, and Cory Raymer playing in the playoff game has to say about him.[/quote]
because molinaro is a tackle

and it would be his first real playing time and do you really want to have that in a playoff game

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

molinaro has thus far had more playing time at DT than at OT.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[QUOTE=steveo395]because molinaro is a tackle

and it would be his first real playing time and do you really want to have that in a playoff game[/QUOTE]

He can play either position. Even with what would have been essentially a rookie performance from Molinaro, it couldn't have been worse than Raymer's showing. I'll bet that's why Raymer's gone now.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]molinaro has thus far had more playing time at DT than at OT.[/QUOTE]

You mean in college?

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

do you think molinaro will be the offical backup tackle if samuels or jansen go down? Because I don't think I've ever seen him play tackle in any game other than pre season.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[QUOTE=Beemnseven]You mean in college?[/QUOTE]

Gregg Williams used him as an emergency DT in situations last year or the year before.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

[quote=Beemnseven]You mean in college?[/quote]

no NFL. 0 snaps at OT in the reg season, probably 10 or so at DT, most of which came in his rookie year.

Re: Redskins | Pucillo signed
 

You know, I like us signing people for depth, but are these people really going to be better than Raymer even?