Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection]Hall is my boy. I have clips of him doing 1) karate after a Taylor tackle 2) doing forward flips after HE tackled someone and 3) ALWAYS wearing hilarious sweatpants all the time.

What other Skin can you say that about?[/quote]

:laughing2 :laughing2 :laughing2

I'd love to see that footage!!!

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

We have the highlights somewhere, the most obvious one is the karate.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=TheMalcolmConnection]3) ALWAYS wearing hilarious sweatpants all the time.[/quote]

hahaha... i can remember laughing at him wearing sweatpants during the oakland game. he's so white. haha.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

John Hall is the man for XP and FGs. We need to find a punter who can handle Kickoff duties and maybe make a TD saving tackle 3 or 4 times this year on special teams! That guy is not Derick Frost.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=cpayne5]I've posted the stats in the past (several times), and they show (overwhelmingly!) that he is nowhere near as bad as people claim. The arguments that he is a bad kicker are completely unfounded. If you want to see a BAD kicking situation, see the years before Jon Hall came to DC.[/quote]

Are you referencing Jose "The Conquistador" Cortez or Brett "Pig-face" Conway?

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=SKINSDUDE]I definately think we are going to be a force to be reckoned with this year. All the haters seem to think we have a quarterback problem, but I beg to differ. If brunnel runs out of his "fountain of youth" juice than Campbell will be ready to step up and lead the team. If Hall is healthy, we should be fine. I still think we should have kept Novak, but I won't go there.[/quote]Campbell wont make an impact this year. If he has to play, the offense will get real tight. But I think we are better off with Brunell than most NFL teams are with their QBs. He is STILL better than Leftwich at this point in their careers.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[I]does'nt matter what the vikes are gonna wear,they are gonna stink up the metrodome this year!!![/I]

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

The only knock I have on John Hall is the injury thing and they way he wears his helmet. I wish someone would show him that it is not a hockey helmet and the chin strap goes on your chin.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=CanadianSkin]The only knock I have on John Hall is the injury thing and they way he wears his helmet. I wish someone would show him that it is not a hockey helmet and the chin strap goes on your chin.[/quote]




Gee thanks, I never noticed that before. Now we have to replace him or that will bug me every time I see him.


[IMG]http://media.theinsiders.com/Media/College_Football/141847_hallwinsit400.JPG[/IMG]

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

holy crap an espn analyst agrees with this thread and i mean they are the experts :yeahright (however i do like jeremy green and not just for this post either)

[B]Majeed:[/B] YO JG answer me this. How do you see the NFC East shaping up? My buddy Mike thinks his Eagles will win the division. Your thoughts?

[IMG]http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/sn2.gif[/IMG] [B]Jeremy Green: [/B]I think the Eagles are the 4th best team in the Division right now based on the additions the other teams have made. I'm going to go with the Skins right now. There FA siginings this season made sense for a change and they found players that actually fit. They are going to be much more explosive with Saunders as the OC and the defense is solid.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=Hail2theskins]holy crap an espn analyst agrees with this thread and i mean they are the experts :yeahright (however i do like jeremy green and not just for this post either)

[B]Majeed:[/B] YO JG answer me this. How do you see the NFC East shaping up? My buddy Mike thinks his Eagles will win the division. Your thoughts?

[IMG]http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/sn2.gif[/IMG] [B]Jeremy Green: [/B]I think the Eagles are the 4th best team in the Division right now based on the additions the other teams have made. I'm going to go with the Skins right now. There FA siginings this season made sense for a change and they found players that actually fit. They are going to be much more explosive with Saunders as the OC and the defense is solid.[/quote]Wouldn't have said it better myself if I hadn't already.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

has that already been posted? if so i apologize for resubmitting

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Nah, that wasn't a repost. I was just commenting on how dead on he is.

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

Sorry guys to interrupt on your Hall thread, but I started this one and why we are the team to beat has little to do with our kicker. All we need is a K who gets 90% on PAT's and can hit 38-42yd FG's. The point of this thread was why we are the team to beat. A reply to the affect of our D allowing the least amount of scores in the red zone would be more along the lines of this thread. Not to be confrontational, but maybe you should have started a John Hall thread....or possibly who should be our kicker.

Hail

Re: The team to beat; REDSKINS
 

[quote=PhxRedSkin]Sorry guys to interrupt on your Hall thread, but I started this one and why we are the team to beat has little to do with our kicker. All we need is a K who gets 90% on PAT's and can hit 38-42yd FG's. The point of this thread was why we are the team to beat. A reply to the affect of our D allowing the least amount of scores in the red zone would be more along the lines of this thread. Not to be confrontational, but maybe you should have started a John Hall thread....or possibly who should be our kicker.

Hail[/quote]I'd hope we could get a kicker whos better than 90% on PATs. 96% or better.