Re: Peter King's view on the Briggs deal
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper;294436]I have heard this argument one hundred times.

Urlacher also has Briggs next to him. That theory goes both ways. Urlacher is not Ray Lewis or Lawrence Taylor. He has definitely benefitted from having a great line and a pro-bowler next to him. I don't buy that Briggs is good only because Urlacher is next to him.

The Chicago D is good because they have studs everywhere, not just because of an over-hyped MLB.[/QUOTE]

I agree 100%

Re: Peter King's view on the Briggs deal
 

they would not be nearly as good without urlachler though!

Re: Peter King's view on the Briggs deal
 

[QUOTE=12thMan;294401]King failed to point out that Briggs a) has Urlacher playing beside him and b) he had one helluva defensive line in front of him.[/QUOTE] A helluva line? I saw that line get run over by a Colt running game that by far is not the best in the NFL in the Super Bowl!

Re: Peter King's view on the Briggs deal
 

I don't put any stock into what Peter King says. The guy is a clown.

1. King said Danny Weurfuel was going to be the next Kurt Warner when OBC took over.
2. King at first said Monk shouldn't be in the HOF.

Re: Peter King's view on the Briggs deal
 

Another Briggs thread?