Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

Like the Skins beat anyone legit....get out of here.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

[quote=saden1;374108]Like the Skins beat anyone legit....get out of here.[/quote]


oh yeah the fact that we beat the lions 34-3, is nothing the same lions that are 6-2 and supposedly scaring everyone.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

[quote=dmek25;374003]i think its just another reason to bitch about the skins[/quote]
I thought the same thing when I saw the thread. You can fool me once but can't fool me twice.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

What about the Lions? I'm still not a believer.

If the Skins take care of business with the Eagles, then take them off this list. But as of right now, we lose in the face of real competition, and do just enough to get by with the mediocre.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;374112]oh yeah the fact that we beat the lions 34-3, is nothing the same lions that are 6-2 and supposedly scaring everyone.[/quote]

It's the Lions, THE LIONS!

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

The Lions are starting to impress me. They are running the ball and playing D. They weren't doing those two things when the Skins played them.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

I've seen about 5 Lions games this year and they are definitely improving as a team. Marinelli/Martz is not too unlike Gibbs/Saunders in that one is working with the other to create a more balanced attack. It helps the Lions that Kevin Jones is healthy again.

The Lions looked great against the Broncos yesterday. However, it was the Broncos. The most overrated team in the league in my opinion. And most of the game the Broncos were "led" by Patrick Ramsey who made, not surprisingly, some horrific decisions and was not helped by his receivers who dropped some easy passes.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

On another note...there are several 500 teams....who is the best here?
Chargers
Saints
Seahawks
Panthers
Bills
Chiefs

Are any of these teams better than the teams with winning records?
Is this the right order from top to bottom?
(I removed the Steelers...cause they are 5-2 and pretty good)
I'm pretty much trying to get a feel for wildcard teams down the stretch

Jaguars 5-3
Redskins 5-3
Ravens 4-3
Bucs 5-4
Chargers 4-4
Saints 4-4
Browns 5-3
Seahawks 4-4
Panthers 4-4
Bills 4-4
Chiefs 4-4

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;374138]I've seen about 5 Lions games this year and they are definitely improving as a team. Marinelli/Martz is not too unlike Gibbs/Saunders in that one is working with the other to create a more balanced attack. It helps the Lions that Kevin Jones is healthy again.

The Lions looked great against the Broncos yesterday. However, it was the Broncos. The most overrated team in the league in my opinion. And most of the game the Broncos were "led" by Patrick Ramsey who made, not surprisingly, some horrific decisions and was not helped by his receivers who dropped some easy passes.[/quote]

I switched over to the Lions game yesterday to get a glimpse of ol Patrick and I just had to laugh with some of the decisions he was making. He still forces balls into coverage and makes throws that just make you scratch your head in wonder.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

[quote=skinsnut;374139]On another note...there are several 500 teams....who is the best here?
Chargers
Saints
Seahawks
Panthers
Bills
Chiefs

Are any of these teams better than the teams with winning records?
Is this the right order from top to bottom?
(I removed the Steelers...cause they are 5-2 and pretty good)
I'm pretty much trying to get a feel for wildcard teams down the stretch

Jaguars 5-3
Redskins 5-3
Ravens 4-3
Bucs 5-4
Chargers 4-4
Saints 4-4
Browns 5-3
Seahawks 4-4
Panthers 4-4
Bills 4-4
Chiefs 4-4[/quote]

Dick J. gets my vote for coach of he year so far. Buffalo got rid of Spikes, Nate C. and Willis, plus they have injuries and are playing rookies and they are 500. Could be over 500 if not for that miracle the Girls pulled out. Very impressive.

But the 500 team playing the best football is NO. They are better than a 500 football team. They are going to be a factor in the NFC playoff race.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

Browns and Ravens are the weakest in the group, followed by us.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

Does it really matter they all have winning records?

AS WE DO......

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

I would say te Lions, at two loses are a weak team w/ many wins.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

we are the weakest team. I hate to say it but its true. If we don't get our passing game going a little better we wont be able to beat any decent teams.

Re: Who is "weakest" team with winning record?
 

like they said another thread to bitch about the skins.