![]() |
Re: What's the word on Golston?
I spotted Golston a few times last night.
|
Re: What's the word on Golston?
Golston and Montgomery are both good players. Some fans seem to think that unless a D-Lineman has 15 sacks he isn't any good. Of course, some fans also think Fred Smoot is a liability, so either they're idiots or I am. I suppose either is possible. Perhaps a poll is in order.
|
Re: What's the word on Golston?
[quote=70Chip;394248]Golston and Montgomery are both good players. Some fans seem to think that unless a D-Lineman has 15 sacks he isn't any good. Of course, some fans also think Fred Smoot is a liability, so either they're idiots or I am. I suppose either is possible. Perhaps a poll is in order.[/quote]
An idiot poll perhaps? Now that would be interesting. |
Re: What's the word on Golston?
Golsten is a far less talented player than either Montgomery and Griffin. So being the third guy in the DT rotation has been about what we should have expected this season. I'm really impressed with Montgomery's progression - I just hope that Golten's work ethic and veteran influence continue to drive him to work hard.
|
Re: What's the word on Golston?
montgomery is a bigger body and has made better strides, golston is better for a rotation, he has a high motor which is his strength i feel
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.