Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=Big C;398121]here is a list of upcoming free agents if we want to look for a lower end one

[url=http://www.draftdaddy.com/nfldraft/freeagentdefense.cfm]Draft Daddy: 2008 NFL Draft: Prospects, Position Rankings, Senior Bowl, Combine[/url][/QUOTE]

I would bring back Chris Clemons he's got 8 sacks this year or sign Danny Clark from the Texans (pretty aggressive player)

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

michael boley is unbelievable, OLB and is 25... hes restricted free agent and im not too knowledgeable on those rules, but i think hes the best on out there.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=SFREDSKIN;398147]I would bring back Chris Clemons he's got 8 sacks this year or sign Danny Clark from the Texans (pretty aggressive player)[/QUOTE]

I noticed Clemons' stats too. It's a shame he got injured and we let him go.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;398201]I noticed Clemons' stats too. It's a shame he got injured and we let him go.[/QUOTE]

We can get him back he'll be a FA.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;398201]I noticed Clemons' stats too. It's a shame he got injured and we let him go.[/quote]

Who's he playing for? 8 sacks? Are you guys serious?

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=12thMan;398205]Who's he playing for? 8 sacks? Are you guys serious?[/QUOTE]

Oakland Raiders

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=12thMan;398205]Who's he playing for? 8 sacks? Are you guys serious?[/QUOTE]

Oakland and yes, he has 8 sacks. The guy was once pegged as a possible replacement for Arrington, but he struggled in coverage, got injured, and was cut. He's gotten spot duty in Oakland and it sounds like he's just a very good role-player (i.e., pass rusher).

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;398207]Oakland and yes, he has 8 sacks. The guy was once pegged as a possible replacement for Arrington, but he struggled in coverage, got injured, and was cut. He's gotten spot duty in Oakland and it sounds like he's just a very good role-player (i.e., pass rusher).[/quote]

That's pretty much exactly what he was here for us. He really showed up when turning the corner rushing from the outside, his quickness was great. He didn't get that many sacks for us, but I remember him always being around the QB when rushing. He was a hair away from a sack on multiple occasions for us. Good role player, but I still don't see him as an every-down LB.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

SmootSmack is going to have a tough time dealing with this.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

I would still sign him, you can never have enough pass rushers. God knows we could use some.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[QUOTE=Schneed10;398210]That's pretty much exactly what he was here for us. He really showed up when turning the corner rushing from the outside, his quickness was great. He didn't get that many sacks for us, but I remember him always being around the QB when rushing. He was a hair away from a sack on multiple occasions for us. Good role player, but I still don't see him as an every-down LB.[/QUOTE]

I'd certainly like to get him back. 8 sacks from a guy who doesn't see the field often is pretty outstanding.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

Chris Wilson basically plays the same position & role for us. It would be nice to get Clemons back, but would we keep both he & Wilson? My gut feeling is that the staff will want to keep Wilson & see if he can improve. He's had a decent year & it was his first in the nfl.

Re: Arizona to Franchise LB Karlos Dansby
 

[quote=freddyg12;398326]Chris Wilson basically plays the same position & role for us. It would be nice to get Clemons back, but would we keep both he & Wilson? My gut feeling is that the staff will want to keep Wilson & see if he can improve. He's had a decent year & it was his first in the nfl.[/quote]

Yeah Marcus Washington has kind of been moved to this role as well at times. The LB who becomes the down lineman/rush end in obvious passing situations.

Depends what Clemons costs. If it's next to nothing, sure why not bring him in. But I wouldn't go spending much considering we've got guys who can do what he's already doing. I mean Marcus has five sacks of his own, and Wilson has two, and I'd guess that just about all of them come from the down lineman/rush end position on obvious passing downs, so we're basically getting the production out of that 3rd down rush specialist spot that Clemons brings to the table.

If you can bring Clemons in for next to nothing, then I think you do it and you let him take Marcus' place as the rush end in obvious pass situations, and then you can move Marcus back to a more traditional LB role.