Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The Preseason Debate (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=2279)

Beemnseven 08-16-2004 09:59 AM

It will never happen, but if I were the commissioner, here are a few changes that I would implement:

No overtime in preseason. If it ends in a tie, so what? And don't give me any crap about how important it is for players to get a feel for sudden-death. Once you're in a sudden-death overtime game in the regular season, by that time everyone should know how important it is. Why increase the chance for injury by extending a meaningless game?

Either shorten the games to just a half, or make it two preseason games tops. If you think about it, the starters -- the people everybody knows will make the roster -- are in for about a series or two, with the most extensive action seen in the third exhibition game. So the scrubs who are in for the majority of snaps in every other game can't possibly make it on the team. Essentially, the coaches are throwing guys out there as 'filler' just so they can field a team. 90% of those types of players aren't going to make the team anyway.

You can't tell me that 3rd and 4th string players are honestly getting evaluated with 5 minutes to go in the fourth quarter against a non-division opponent who's also lining up their 4th string. Most of the evaluation happens in camp and practices anyway.

I would also allow the final roster cuts much further into the regular season, say the 4th game. If player evaluation is so important, then extend the final roster cut deadline, and while you're at it, make it a sixty-man roster instead of 53.

No, I'm not a fan of preseason. And yes, injuries happen and they happen in many circumstances, not just an exhibition game. Anquan Boldin, David Boston and Jimmy Kennedy are good examples of guys who got hurt on the practice field. But try explaining that to fans of Michael Vick, Chad Pennington, or Jon Jansen. It's a money making scam that even the most knowledgeable NFL fans fall for hook, line and sinker. Until people stop paying attention, stop attending and stop watching nationally televised preseason games, the NFL and the team owners will never change anything.

MTK 08-16-2004 11:14 AM

I agree with the no OT idea. Call it a tie and call it a night.

backrow 08-16-2004 02:13 PM

Three!
 
Three pre-season games! No OT! Charge less for PS games!
18 Game season.
The idea is to evaluate back-up talent and not get starters hurt. That's why they are pulled out after a series or two in PS!

:dallas:

SkinsRock 08-16-2004 04:57 PM

I think 4 preseason games is good, but 5 is too many. They should just make the HOF game the first pre-season game (out of 4) for the teams involved, a few days before the rest of the games and those two teams will just have a couple extra days in between games....similar to having the regular season kick-off game on Thursday like they do now.
I agree that OT in preseason is senseless. The games don't matter anyway.
As for injuries, they can happen anywhere...practice, games, etc. Jansen's injury happened with no one around him. That is not a good reason to cut the number of preseason games down. The 3rd and 4th stringer do get a good evaluation in the games rather than practice, even if they are going against othe 3rd and 4th stringers. The coaches can see how they react in a real game atmosphere against another team, which can not really be duplicated in a practice.
I think an 18 game season with a 3 game preseason would work well. If that happens, then the rosters should be increased to 60 with 55 active on game-day (from 53 and 48, respectively).

sportscurmudgeon 08-17-2004 07:20 PM

illdefined:

This is not a conspiracy against the Redskins by the evil geniuses in the NFL offices.

Every year, two teams are "invited" to play in the Hall of Fame Game. It becomes a 5th pre-season game for those two teams and the NFL tries to spread it around because some coaches find that extra game a big positive. Teams may decline the invitation; I dont' recall that any have ever done that.

When Carolina and Jax entgered the league, those two teams played in the Hall of Fame Game. That was purely a PR show. The league tries to have one NFC and one AFC team each year, but they do not always find a good storyline to put such a match-up together.

The Broncos being invited made sense because the NFL was "pretty sure" that John Elway would be an inductee to the HoF in this year - his first year of eligibility. So, Denver was a natural invitee. After the blockbuster trade of Portis for Bailey, the Redskins became the logical opponent for the game.

Just remember, Danny Boy and/or Joe Gibbs could have politely declined that invitation if they had chosen to do so.

illdefined 08-18-2004 08:53 AM

well they should stop preying on Dan Snyder's ego every year, of course he'll always say yes. or, what THEY SHOULD DO IS INDUCT ART MONK. then we'll play their stupid extra meaningless game..

Hogskin 08-18-2004 10:22 AM

Good post, CURMUDGEON. Also, I think Gibbs coming back and being in the HOF was key in selecting the Redskins.

ILL, I agree, Monk should be there, but the fact is we played in the game anyhow. GOOD THING, too. Looks like with the rust and new system, they need all the prep they can get!! I am very happy we got the extra opportunity this year.

MTK 08-18-2004 10:42 AM

I'm not a big fan of the current 4 preseason game setup and 5 is even worse, but for once I think this is actually a benefit.

With the new staff, new players and Gibbs coming back after a 12 year absence, I'm sure he likes having the extra game.

illdefined 08-18-2004 12:10 PM

you guys seem to forget what happened to Jansen. and Vick last year etc. etc. if we're gonna put these guys under fire, at least let it be a meaningful game. i understand the teams need to practice under game conditions, but most of these guys have played before and 5 games is excessive. enough people get hurt in practice.

MTK 08-18-2004 12:15 PM

Injuries are an unfortunate part of the game. They happen in camp, preseason and the regular season. Even if they were to cut down the preseason to 2 games, that's not going to eliminate injuries.

Hogskin 08-18-2004 12:42 PM

Exactly right, Matty. And as far Jansen's injury that was mentioned as an argument, there wasn't even CONTACT when it happened. It was apparently an injury "waiting to happen". I love the idea of moving 2 preseason games to regular season (for an 18-game season), and it is extremely likely in a couple years. But that will not cut down on injuries, it will add more!! The 30 minutes with scrubs on the field will be changed to 30 minutes with starters for those two games. And the intensity will defiitely be higher.

Gmanc711 08-18-2004 05:10 PM

FREE BEER TO THOSE UNDER 21 FOR PRESEASON GAMES!

Haha, jk.

Seriously though, I would say cut it down to three games. Really the OT isnt that big a deal to me, cause its all the guys who are 4th string anyways, so if they get hurt, its not gonna kill a team.

And for Admission, take the prices down for christ sakes. They should be charging like 10 bucks for these stupid games.

Hogskin 08-18-2004 06:45 PM

[QUOTE=Gmanc711]And for Admission, take the prices down for christ sakes. They should be charging like 10 bucks for these stupid games.[/QUOTE]

Boy, THAT's the truth. Unfortunately, the $$ are all that counts, and they have the season ticket holders by the short hairs and make them buy seats at that high price (at least that's the way it was when I lived up there).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.98392 seconds with 9 queries