We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.[/QUOTE]

10 penalties for 82 yards is something I thought we solved. Derrick Dockery has to be one of the most underserving lineman to start for this team. He still makes the same mistakes over and over.

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.[/QUOTE]

Understood that it's not all Brunell, but sometimes it just takes a change to spark the rest of the team and make them perform better. Who knows if it will, but it certainly couldn't hurt to give it a shot at this point. But Gibbs won't do it. I hate to say it, but I was actually hoping Brunell would have gotten injured so Gibbs would have to put Ramsey in there....nothing real bad, but just enough to give Patrick 1-2 starts to see what he could do...
And as for the protection, yeah it was lacking, but it was still nothing near what it was last year.

with the line blocking like that , 4 sacks- mobile be for real.

[quote]so whats worse, inaccurate but non-INT passes or sacks?[/quote] umm... 2 ints and 4 sacks, check the facts, your wrong.

All this crap about ramsey, INT-King are stupid, since brunell's been here his TD/TO ratio is worse than ramsey's, and he's had a better scheme (in most people's eyes)... sailing slow balls high isn't preventing INTs, its preventing [b]completions[/b].