![]() |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=SmootSmack;674232]Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It's not hard to see what's been discussed. Just do a search for "Bradford" and you would find (at minimum) this:
[url]http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35374-schefter-theres-no-way-rams-wont.html?[/url] [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35552-bradford-won-t-oklahoma-s-pro.html?[/url] [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35456-nfl-95-mock-munch-bradford-takes.html?[/url] [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/35215-malcolm-kelly-gives-his-thoughts-sam.html?[/url] [url]http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-central/34870-79-mock-drafts-sam-bradford-still.html?[/url] Don't want to do that? When you start a thread you could type in "Bradford" in the title and then click on "check if already posted" right next to it. As for Bradford himself 1) I'm pretty sure his shoulder injury wasn't nearly as bad as Drew Brees' 2) He has thrown plenty of passes, just hasn't done it for the general public I'll leave this open for now (not really even sure why) but I don't doubt it will be locked soon enough[/quote] There is no reason to be rude. I don't know what's wrong with you guys but many of you aren't showing a lot of class right now. If you guys don't want to discuss this with me then do what's in your heart and not ignore the thread. If you disagree with me then can sumbit your opinion respectfully. There is absolutely no reason to rude to fellow Skins fan that wants to best for the team just like you do. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=SBXVII;674222]#1- Bradford has proven to be the most accurate of all the QB's.
#2- Yes his injury is a concern, but his doctor works for or with the Skins. :) #3- We already have had several QB's in the past that had good arms, just not accurate: Ramsey Brunell (technically prior to coming to the Skins) Campbell Collins So we don't need simply a strong armed QB, we need an accurate passer.[B] It has been pointed out that the next most accurate passer would be McCoy [/B]who's arm is weaker then Bradfords. #4- Can we start a thread "Why we don't need Okung"? I keep hearing how he's too big and possibly slow for Shanahan's scheme.[/quote] I'd be for that if they can manage to trade down and still get a good OT that fits the scheme. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
You guys are acting like a group of bitches on their period. If this thread such a waste of your time then simple ignore it. That would make more sense.
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Landry44;674161]This guy has missed practically a whole season of football. He got a serious shoulder injury that I believe is more serious than first advertised. He has yet to prove that he still got it. I just think he's to much of a risk to draft him at 4th overall. I know we need a franchise qb. But is Bradford a franchise qb? I honestly do not see it.[/quote]
Describe what you consider a franchise QB. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=skinsfaninok;674252]Please lock![/quote]
I'm sure this is blasphemy for Bradford boners. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Landry44;674256]You guys are acting like a group of bitches on their period. If this thread such a waste of your time then simple ignore it. That would make more sense.[/quote]
How exactly are we being a bunch of bitches? Why couldn't you just discuss Bradford in one of the other 20 threads? |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Landry44;674253]There is no reason to be rude. I don't know what's wrong with you guys but many of you aren't showing a lot of class right now. If you guys don't want to discuss this with me then do what's in your heart and not ignore the thread. If you disagree with me then can sumbit your opinion respectfully. There is absolutely no reason to rude to fellow Skins fan that wants to best for the team just like you do.[/quote]
Stop while your behind. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
Take it easy on OP. He clearly had something on his mind and needed some immediate feedback. It won't happen again. It's just a little freak out. That's all. No harm done.
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
Don't lock this thread until he gives me his definition of what a franchise QB is.
|
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Longtimefan;674257]Describe what you consider a franchise QB.[/quote]
When I think of a franchise qb I'm looking for a guy who's very intelligent, extremely accurate, and capable of making all the throws. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Landry44;674276]When I think of a franchise qb I'm looking for a guy who's very intelligent, extremely accurate, and capable of making all the throws.[/quote]
That rather speaks for the majority of the QB's in the league. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Landry44;674276]When I think of a franchise qb I'm looking for a guy who's very intelligent, extremely accurate, and capable of making all the throws.[/quote]Here are some quotes from Scouts Inc. on Bradford regarding:
[B]Intelligence[/B]: "Cerebral quarterback. Not an in-your-face type leader but commands the huddle. Displays poise under pressure. Mentally/physically tough." He also scored a [URL="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sportsprose/2010/03/report_sam_bradford_scores_36.html"]36 on the Wonderlic test,[/URL] take that for whatever you want. [B]Accuracy[/B]: "2006: Redshirted. 2007: (14/14) 237 for 341 (69.5 pct.), 3,121 yards, 36 TD, 8 INT. 2008: (14/14) Heisman Trophy winner. 328 for 483 (67.9 pct.), 4,720 yards, 50 TD, 8 INT." [URL="http://www.newerascouting.com/01/sam-bradford-scouting-report/"]Another site says [/URL]"Can put the ball into tight windows, even though he doesn’t have the best zip on his passes. Bradford showed elite accuracy as a sophomore when he won the Heisman Trophy in 2008." [B]Throw Capability[/B]: "He can make all of the NFL throws. Shows good touch and timing on the vertical throws." So is your main concern the injury? |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=Longtimefan;674277]That rather speaks for the majority of the QB's in the league.[/quote]
Doesn't sound like Jason Campbell. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
A thread dedicated to concerns over Bradford seems logical w/ the draft approaching.
My take is even w/o injury concerns taking him in the top 5 seems irresponsible at best. Again I just keep looking back at the youtube video and my word this kid's passes are wobbly and often very, very weak. Big lobs and lots of arch even on medium range passes. Maybe seeing him throw at a proday or whatever alleviates some of those concerns if he seems to have increased his strength/velocity a lot; however, until this is SEEN and basically documented I think the notion Bradford is a great NFL QB prospect is pretty unjustified. |
Re: We should stay away from Bradford
[quote=WaldSkins;674287]Doesn't sound like Jason Campbell.[/quote]
I don't think anyone is talking about him here. Just because someone doesn't want Bradford, it doesn't mean that they want or think that Campbell is the QB of the future. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.