Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I would take Marshall only if we gave Denver our 2011 1st round pick not this years first rder. The guy is easilly a top 3 WR behind fitz and a.Johnson . He gets 100 rec every year.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Zerohero;678780]As crazy as it sounds, TO would be cheap and amped to beat the Cowgirls and Eagles[/quote]

And eventually he would be amped to beat the Redskins a year or two later when he signs with the Giants. Though if it's going to happen T.O. is the more likely choice considering the fact that Marshall is going to net the Bronco's a 1st or early 2nd round pick. God, CP, T.O., and Haynesworth on the same team. Talk about wine and cheese.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=Skinny Tee;678777]Id rather have TO.

He's a free agent and wouldn't cost us our most precious renewing resource that is our draft picks.[/quote]

Plus, less problems with our HC.


Owens drops a lot of passes but has seemed to have actually grown up, maturity-wise.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

If it were one or the other, definitely go with Marshall.

T.O. is well into his thirties. maybe get one or 2 years out of him. Marshall is a guy that can be a part of the franchise for much longer. A much wiser investment.

And T.O. is ALWAYS a model citizen in the first year with a team. Its year 2 and 3 where he becomes a haedache.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I like TO. He's a bit odd, but he's basically a pretty good guy...but I'd rather have Brandon Marshall on the field.

But we won't be trading a high pick for him

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Like either is going to be coming here...and Shanahan probably believes he could get the WRs we have now to acquire the necessary [B]human capital[/B] (gee, a new concept that only economists seem to regard as common knowledge) to be solid producers or better.

[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4469786]Sources: Former Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan planned to jettison Brandon Marshall - ESPN[/url]

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

We haven't really brought anyone in who wants a guaranteed starting job. So I doubt either will be given much of a look. This year just seems to me like a chance for Shanahan to find and develop his core group. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

No thanks to TO. Chances are high there won't be football in 2011, and the guy is old as it is. We need to build a young core because we're years away from competing for a title.

I'd love to sign Marshall as a free agent but he's not free. I'd rather make the pick and try to hit it big on the next great WR or offensive lineman to come out of the middle rounds of the draft.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

Is this suppose to be a serious question? Brandon of course!

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=McD5;678785]I would love to see us ship a player out, or some combination of a player and low round draft pick for Marshall.

A TE maybe? Landry? Anything like that would work.[/quote]

For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league. Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=sandtrapjack;678798]If it were one or the other, definitely go with Marshall.

T.O. is well into his thirties. maybe get one or 2 years out of him. Marshall is a guy that can be a part of the franchise for much longer. A much wiser investment.

And T.O. is ALWAYS a model citizen in the first year with a team. Its year 2 and 3 where he becomes a haedache.[/quote]

I've stopped listening to you in regards to T.O. or Marshall. :)

Obviously everybody should want Marshall. He's a top ranked WR and still young. The only bad issue with him is what it would take to get him. Clearly a dallas fan would love to see the Skins give up their 1st round pick for a WR.

I'd rather us pick up T.O. cause he would be cheaper. Keep in mind I would only pick him up for a 2 year deal. Thats about as long as he can contain himself. Plus hopefully by then we would know what we have in our WR's and whether we needed to pick up someone else in the draft. Plus picking up T.O. would enable us to look elsewhere prior to being forced to draft a WR.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/26/shanahan-doesnt-rule-out-big-name-receivers/]Shanahan doesn't rule out big name receivers | ProFootballTalk.com[/url]

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=SBXVII;678818]For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

[B]My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league.[/B] Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.[/quote]

But no one wants to give them that. Just like the Redskins want at least a 3rd for JC, but no one wants to give them that

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

I would take TO over Marshall. TO is a good guy with a huge ego, Marshall is just a punk with a bad attitude. TO would be cheaper and he stomped on that Dallas star when he was with the niners. I have a feeling he will be a Redskin in 2010.

Re: Brandon or T.O. ?
 

[quote=SBXVII;678818]For some reason I pictured the Rams fans saying.....

"I'll take Jason Campbell, I'd would love to see us ship a player out and a low round draft pick for Campbell."

and right about now you guys are saying...."Hell no! Jason is worth more then that. We want a 1st round draft pick." Then their is the more reality based fans who would be saying "We'll take a second or a third round draft pick."

My point. Denver wants a 1st round draft pick for one of the elite WR's in the league. Not a 1st for a mediocre QB or middle of the road WR.[/quote]

I'd take a 4th, maybe even a 5th for JC. Being realistic. I hate to trade draft picks.