Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Unofficial 2011 Opponents (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=40824)

SmootSmack 01-02-2011 10:05 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=Alvin Walton;774511]Wow, thats a fairly easy schedule.
Is someone actually being nice to us?
Jets and Pats are the only really scary ones on that list.[/quote]

Remember how easy the first half of the 09 schedule was supposed to be?

Hog1 01-02-2011 10:08 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=DynamiteRave;774448]Well if the teams were similar to what they were this year.. I see a [B][SIZE=3]potential 8-8 season[/SIZE][/B]. Hallelujah. If we make some DIRE changes during the off season, hopefully better than that.[/quote]
All your hopes and dreams?
Say it proud!

SFREDSKIN 01-02-2011 10:38 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=Alvin Walton;774511]Wow, thats a fairly easy schedule.
Is someone actually being nice to us?
Jets and Pats are the only really scary ones on that list.[/quote]

I would say a lot of those teams were supposed to be playoff teams this year:

Minnesota, Dallas, Giants, Miami, SF. Seattle and Rams are currently playing for a playoff spot and the Redskins have lost the last 2 straight games to the Rams. Not an easy schedule by any means.

SirClintonPortis 01-02-2011 10:59 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
The only "easy" teams we get are 'Zona, Seattle, and Buffalo.

Of course, we could sign a ton of quality free agents this year and go 10-6 just like Gibbs II.

Monkeydad 01-03-2011 06:41 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=DM72;774444]I just hope the Buffalo game isn't in Toronto.[/quote]

Or London. :soapbox:

Longtimefan 01-03-2011 07:03 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
The schedule on it's surface appears favorable but, by the teams own admission, they struggle finding ways to win the games they are expected to win. No easy games in the NFL.

tryfuhl 01-03-2011 07:16 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=SirClintonPortis;774528]The only "easy" teams we get are 'Zona, Seattle, and Buffalo.

Of course, we could sign a ton of quality free agents this year and go 10-6 just like Gibbs II.[/quote]

As of now you can add at least Carolina

Dirtbag59 01-03-2011 08:32 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=SmootSmack;774517]Remember how easy the first half of the 09 schedule was supposed to be?[/quote]

That schedule was ridiculously easy. We're talking WAC easy. Detroit, St. Louis, Tampa, and Kansas City. 4 of the teams that picked in the top 5 of the 2010 NFL draft. Carolina was a nice touch as well.

SirClintonPortis 01-03-2011 11:32 PM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=tryfuhl;774881]As of now you can add at least Carolina[/quote]

Even though the trend has been broken with regards to NFC South division winners, that division always has had a team that looks like a perennial loser only for that team to revitalize itself a year or two later.

CrustyRedskin 01-04-2011 11:31 AM

Re: Unofficial 2011 Opponents
 
[quote=tryfuhl;774442]If there is a 2011, based on the rulebook for scheduling, here are our opponents for next year:

HOME: Dallas, Philadelphia, New York, Minnesota, New England, NY Jets, San Francisco, Seattle

AWAY: Dallas, Philadelphia, New York, Carolina, Buffalo, Miami, Arizona, St. Louis

[url=http://blogs.fredericksburg.com/redskinsjournal/2011/01/02/redskins-finish-in-last-place-2011-opponents-set/]Redskins finish in last place, 2011 opponents set - Redskins Journal[/url]

The tougher games seem to be at home, though we've been a horrible home team lately, and those that should be easier are on the road.[/quote]

If we cant muster up a playoff berth against those pile of turds we never will. Go Shanny Go!!!!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.08997 seconds with 9 queries