Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=WaldSkins;962197]If I was gonna cut anyone it would be Wilson. But we are already thin at the position anyway so we can't afford to lose anyone. Let Wilson and routt start and move dhall to starting fs[/quote]

We have to get rid of D Hall's contract. Its a must

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=Chico23231;962209]We have to get rid of D Hall's contract. Its a must[/quote]

D Hall will be gone. Don't worry bout that.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/07/stanford-routt-and-his-agent-are-shocked-the-chiefs-cut-him/"]Source (PFT):[/URL]

the Kansas City Chiefs just cut Stanford Routt stating he was taking to long to fully grasp the defense there . . . that being said, he is better than most if not all of our CB's . . . take a shot?? . . . I would!!

Notes:

[quote]Vann McElroy, Routt’s agent, told the Kansas City Star he didn’t see the release coming and isn’t sure why it happened.

“I’m still trying to figure it out,” McElroy said. “It’s a weird situation.”

Chiefs coach Romeo Crennel said that Routt wasn’t getting acclimated to the Chiefs’ defense as quickly as the team had hoped, but McElroy found it surprising that the Chiefs would give up on a player they just gave a $4.2 million signing bonus in March.

“I know they’re 1-7, and they’re looking for reasons . . . I have no clue what happened,” said McElroy. “I’ve got a call in to Scott [Pioli]. I talked to Stanford, and he’s about as surprised and shocked and down as one can be. He doesn’t totally understand it either.”

Although things didn’t work out in Kansas City, Routt had started seven games before the Chiefs cut him, and he was a starter the last two years in Oakland, too. A cornerback who’s good enough to start doesn’t become available in the middle of a season very often. So as big a surprise as it was that the Chiefs cut Routt, it will be an even bigger surprise if he remains unemployed for long.[/quote]

Thoughts??

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=Chico23231;962209]We have to get rid of D Hall's contract. Its a must[/quote]
NO worries...probably not the best of years to have an attitude problem, substandard performance and a......Fat contract.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=SkinsGuru;962242][URL="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/11/07/stanford-routt-and-his-agent-are-shocked-the-chiefs-cut-him/"]Source (PFT):[/URL]

the Kansas City Chiefs just cut Stanford Routt stating he was taking to long to fully grasp the defense there . . . that being said, he is better than most if not all of our CB's . . . take a shot?? . . . I would!!

Notes:



Thoughts??[/quote]

yes lets get him

Re: Defensive Parts
 

I don't see any downside to signing Routt.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;962184]I really don't understand how Josh Wilson is still liked by fans, the guy is straight Garbage[/quote]
I don't either. He makes DHall look all pro to me. All his pass interference calls have come in the corner of the end zone that I sit in. I can see the whole play develop and I can see it in his eyes as he is running with the receiver. I start pointing to him to turn around knowing full well he is going to interfere instead of turning around and making the play. I just don't understand it. He is right there in position to make a play but never turns around and chooses to molest the receivers.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

It's funny how it took almost 4 years for most of you to realize that Hall was a terrible signing and that he sucks.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;962275]It's funny how it took almost 4 years for most of you to realize that Hall was a terrible signing and that he sucks.[/quote]

I've been saying that all along... But noooo, some people insisted he was a modern day Prime Time. I will promise you one thing tho, put him on any other team and he will be.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;962253]I don't see any downside to signing Routt.[/quote]

I don't see much upside to what profootballfocus.com calls "one of the worst starting CBs in the NFL"

Re: Defensive Parts
 

Hall is exactly like prime time. Makes a few picks that make him look good, is fast, lazy, runs his mouth, and he's over rated. Prime time = hall < green

[QUOTE=Pigskins;962306]Hall is exactly like prime time. Makes a few picks that make him look good, is fast, lazy, runs his mouth, and he's over rated. Prime time = hall < green[/QUOTE]

If your referring to deion Sanders, that's a wrong statement. Sanders is the best CB to ever play the game , teams literally feared throwing his way.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;962308]If your referring to deion Sanders, that's a wrong statement. Sanders is the best CB to ever play the game , teams literally feared throwing his way.[/quote]

Deion was terrible!!!!! Most over rated to ever play the game. Green was way better. Deion would never make a tackle. Green actually had more pick then Deion and way more tackles. Deion was only good at running his mouth, put a big mouth in Dallas and he will make headlines.

Re: Defensive Parts
 

Darrell green was by far a better corner than Deion

Re: Defensive Parts
 

If I were Mike Shanahan, I would trade D. Hall and our second round pick for a mid round selection in the 1st round and draft Xavier Rhodes from Florida State. The guy can cover in man to man coverage well and he's big and tall. I would keep Josh Wilson but would be willing to upgrade if I can find a CB in the third round worthy of taking his place with the hopes that Chase Minnefield and Richard Crawford can contribute.

I love the Maryland Terps, but I would say goodbye to Madieu Williams and maybe Tanard Jackson too. What guarantee is there that Jackson won't blow it yet again and disappoint for his failure to stop using illegal substances? I would make a trade for a younger veteran free safety. As far as SS, I'd be willing to keep Brandon Meriweather but would draft a safety on the strong side.