Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=Giantone;1012177]Seahawks' aren't to bad either[/quote]

Too bad they arent in the AFC anymore.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1012206]Too bad they arent in the AFC anymore.[/quote]




Funny thing is my day went down hill from here , thanks.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

Sounds like Chad Johnson was released from jail this morning

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;1012231]Sounds like Chad Johnson was released from jail this morning[/QUOTE]

That didn't last long.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=GTripp0012;1012149]Probably the best team in the AFC.[/quote]

AFC North, yes. Still put them behind the Broncos overall in the AFC though. They need to overcome the playoff monster this year.. Dalton is still a bit of a question mark, does he have a next level or are we seeing his ceiling? They remind me of 2009-2010 Houston. Time to take the next step.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

Morons

[url=http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/6/17/4439610/steve-gleason-audio-790-the-zone-atlanta]Audio: 790 The Zone's offensive Steve Gleason bit - SBNation.com[/url]

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1012317]Morons

[url=http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/6/17/4439610/steve-gleason-audio-790-the-zone-atlanta]Audio: 790 The Zone's offensive Steve Gleason bit - SBNation.com[/url][/quote]

:doh:

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1012317]Morons

[url=http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/6/17/4439610/steve-gleason-audio-790-the-zone-atlanta]Audio: 790 The Zone's offensive Steve Gleason bit - SBNation.com[/url][/quote]

It's unfortunate that they can reach a large amount of people when they are clearly not capable of distinguishing a good idea from a bad idea.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=mooby;1012319]It's unfortunate that they can reach a large amount of people when they are clearly not capable of distinguishing a good idea from a bad idea.[/quote]

[url=http://www.accessatlanta.com/weblogs/radio-tv-talk/2013/jun/17/790-zone-fires-mayhem-am/]790 The Zone fires Mayhem in the AM | Radio & TV Talk | www.accessatlanta.com[/url]

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=SmootSmack;1012321][url=http://www.accessatlanta.com/weblogs/radio-tv-talk/2013/jun/17/790-zone-fires-mayhem-am/]790 The Zone fires Mayhem in the AM | Radio & TV Talk | www.accessatlanta.com[/url][/quote]

That was quick. I don't feel bad for them, despite the fact they've apparently been hosting that show for years. Honestly kinda sounds like they were done anyway, their dismissal just came a few months early. It's probably a smart move by 790 The Zone to just distance themselves from this as quick as possible anyways.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000212874/article/chad-johnson-hopes-for-another-chance-at-nfl-roster]Chad Johnson hopes for another chance at NFL roster - NFL.com[/url]

So. Mr Johnson wants to play in the NFL again. I wouldn't mind signing him for some good competition. We would only put him on the 53 man roster if he was spectacular(I wouldn't count on it). Can you put a clause in a contract that says if you get in trouble with the law, your pay is forfeited?

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=SirLK26;1012401][URL="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000212874/article/chad-johnson-hopes-for-another-chance-at-nfl-roster"]Chad Johnson hopes for another chance at NFL roster - NFL.com[/URL]

So. Mr Johnson wants to play in the NFL again. I wouldn't mind signing him for some good competition. We would only put him on the 53 man roster if he was spectacular(I wouldn't count on it). Can you put a clause in a contract that says if you get in trouble with the law, your pay is forfeited?[/quote]

I wouldn't bring him in. I feel like, in his better days, CJ got by on his athleticism, not by how hard he worked, and since his athleticism is mostly gone, and he never was the epitome of a hard worker, he really wouldn't bring any value to the team. The only thing he could do at this point is show the younger guys how to work hard and prepare, and I don't think he'd be the best guy for that. If he was anything halfway to spectacular at this point in his career, one of his previous franchises would've kept him.
TL;DR: Don't bring him in.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

Johnson is done. At this point TO would probably get a call from a team long before he would.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

[quote=SirLK26;1012401][url=http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000212874/article/chad-johnson-hopes-for-another-chance-at-nfl-roster]Chad Johnson hopes for another chance at NFL roster - NFL.com[/url]

So. Mr Johnson wants to play in the NFL again. [B]I wouldn't mind signing him for some good competition[/B]. We would only put him on the 53 man roster if he was spectacular(I wouldn't count on it). Can you put a clause in a contract that says if you get in trouble with the law, your pay is forfeited?[/quote]

Ummm.....Hell No.

Re: Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)
 

Chico, read the sentence directly after what you put in bold. I understand where you're coming from, but just for competition, I think it's a good idea.