Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

I’m calling bullshit on all the excuses.
You don’t draft a TE in the draft to just block.


"The amount of things I can do is unlimited," Sinnott said. "With my alignments, with what [Kansas] K State trusted me with. I think Coach [Kliff] Kingsbury's going to have a lot of fun with what he can do and with where he can put me."

I want to see some of this fun stuff he is talking about. Dude can’t beat out Bates.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=jamf;1369405]I’m calling bullshit on all the excuses.
You don’t draft a TE in the draft to just block.


"The amount of things I can do is unlimited," Sinnott said. "With my alignments, with what [Kansas] K State trusted me with. I think Coach [Kliff] Kingsbury's going to have a lot of fun with what he can do and with where he can put me."

I want to see some of this fun stuff he is talking about. Dude can’t beat out Bates.[/quote]


Agreed....

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[QUOTE=jamf;1369405]I’m calling bullshit on all the excuses.

You don’t draft a TE in the draft to just block.





"The amount of things I can do is unlimited," Sinnott said. "With my alignments, with what [Kansas] K State trusted me with. I think Coach [Kliff] Kingsbury's going to have a lot of fun with what he can do and with where he can put me."



I want to see some of this fun stuff he is talking about. Dude can’t beat out Bates.[/QUOTE]Disagree. Ertz clearly has the trust of JD5 and Kingsbury. Also, Sinnott's one TD came when Marriota was in. I think it's clear that this team doesn't rush players, and is overly cautious in giving playing time to non-vets and injured players. Is that a good or bad thing I don't know, but I don't think it is a reflection on any of the rookie class.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

i think Ben is competing for Zack's PT not Bates. If Bates is in its most like to help block and/or a running play

Zack was definitely brought in as a vet leader that KK was familiar with and was definitely here to help JD5 along (short term solution at TE)

Ben has to be their long term catching TE so there is no really no need to rush him

But we did make this move Tuesday, which maybe for depth and tells me Zack is out for sunday

[url]https://sports.yahoo.com/commander-sign-former-eagles-tight-183322289.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEUlurTDnfc5ShLwHLlCbU5RwFgmsqopgd3O5lZlyFM1Jxmc0Z6yLdEv61BL_BVCRZwT96gdblEizfRjhXB4fz2ZrOanZ1rKzivgfnJAm1xu4R5FiBFd8EdFpabEiG-1o9fJKZtuWodB-YTXkwrpWOqjCP5OdBDYzDx0uGqfEeuZ#:~:text=The%20Commanders%20(9%2D5),squad%20ahead%20of%20Week%2016[/url].

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

If Sinnott doesn't play then John Bates will see a bunch of looks from Daniels.....Bates is a huge target at 6'6 260....

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

Hopefully his comparison is to Trey McBride. Second round pick (55 be 53), offense run by kliff Kingsbury that has Zach Ertz at tight end #1, and they’re both basically the same size.

McBride only had 46 receiving yards his before December in his rookie year, so maybe Ben’s also a late bloomer.

Or maybe he stinks.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[url]https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2024/12/28/washington-commanders-kliff-kingsbury-say-rookie-tight-end-ben-sinnott/[/url]

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1369908][url]https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2024/12/28/washington-commanders-kliff-kingsbury-say-rookie-tight-end-ben-sinnott/[/url]

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk[/quote]Kingsbury seems somewhat vague with his comments on him. Almost sounds like his blocking needs to improve. Would love for him to end up like McBride as alluded to earlier in this thread. Kid is a stud.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1369908][url]https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2024/12/28/washington-commanders-kliff-kingsbury-say-rookie-tight-end-ben-sinnott/[/url]

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk[/quote]

This article pretty much tells the entire story on Ben Sinnott's lack of playing time. It's just that Zack Ertz has been able to do much more than was expected of him this season and John Bates is one of the top blocking TEs in the league. There is nothing wrong with Ben Sinnott. His time will come.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1369926]There is nothing wrong with Ben Sinnott. His time will come.[/quote]I certainly hope you are correct. Expectations should be high considering he was a 2nd rounder. He's only 22 years old so a long career potentially ahead of him.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

some of you really need to

[IMG]https://media.tenor.com/lGK_iTIZyDQAAAAM/chill-zen.gif[/IMG]

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=KI Skins Fan;1369926]This article pretty much tells the entire story on Ben Sinnott's lack of playing time. It's just that Zack Ertz has been able to do much more than was expected of him this season and John Bates is one of the top blocking TEs in the league. There is nothing wrong with Ben Sinnott. His time will come.[/quote]



His time will indeed come. But Sinnott should have had more playing time in the offense......he should have at least 20 receptions this season....

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=REDSKINS4ever;1370308]His time will indeed come. But Sinnott should have had more playing time in the offense......he should have at least 20 receptions this season....[/quote]Ertz has played well this year. He's had a few drops but overalll been good. Him and JD have a good connection especially over the middle. Excited to see what Sinnott can ultimately bring to the table.

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[url]https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-the-top-five-rookie-classes-of-the-2024-nfl-season-commanders-eagles-struck-gold[/url]

got ranked top draft class; not bad not bad

Re: #82 Ben Sinnott
 

[quote=mredskins;1370396][url]https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-the-top-five-rookie-classes-of-the-2024-nfl-season-commanders-eagles-struck-gold[/url]

got ranked top draft class; not bad not bad[/quote]

If we only drafted Jayden Daniels we would still be Top 5.