Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;335743]Everyone was saying that Rice is over the hill and his best days have past. Well Michael Strahan is old and washed up. Why would we sign a guy that is 4 years older then Rice. Synder is an idiot, he is killing this team. I would go after Alex Brown or Rice before I would go after Strahan. The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Larry Centers, David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, Lloyd, Randel El,

Believe me Strahan will fit on this list of under acheivers--over paid players that Snyder brought in.

Here's a list of guys we could have made a move for this year.

Darwin Walker, Kris Jenkins, Tank Johnson, Corey Simon, Alex Brown, Kevin Carter, Ian Scott[/QUOTE]

You forgot Archuleta, lol.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;335743]Everyone was saying that Rice is over the hill and his best days have past. Well Michael Strahan is old and washed up. Why would we sign a guy that is 4 years older then Rice. Synder is an idiot, he is killing this team. I would go after Alex Brown or Rice before I would go after Strahan. The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Larry Centers, David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, Lloyd, Randel El,

Believe me Strahan will fit on this list of under acheivers--over paid players that Snyder brought in.

Here's a list of guys we could have made a move for this year.

Darwin Walker, Kris Jenkins, Tank Johnson, Corey Simon, Alex Brown, Kevin Carter, Ian Scott[/quote]

Earthquake - your post about sums up the mess of our FO decision making. Not only have the Skins hurt their cap with these signings, but we throw away a lot of picks to get these "valuable / key" players and we also let go of a lot of our own key free agents.

One other thing people forgot to mention relating to Strahan - hasn't Gibbs and Williams been defending the defensive line for the past month saying we believe in these guys and were sticking with them this year when asked by the media why they didn't draft any defensive lineman? So basically Gibbs and Williams were lying and have no faith in their defensive lineman as soon as Strahan gets his name thrown out by the media as a possible player that can be acquired? If this is true it means that the coaches probably don't have too much faith in the defensive line and that makes me worry that this is not going to be a season to remember as far as the Defense is concerned.

Like the majority of the posters say - no more old, beat up players looking for bejamins. Give your defensive lineman a chance to prove themselves like you said they deserve - and if things fall apart repair them next offseason.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

I never liked Gappy for that whole Brett Favre thing. Please somebody break the single season sack record.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=Smooter;335767]You forgot Archuleta, lol.[/quote]


Thank you I forgot about him (how could that happen)

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

Well turns out that the rumor is true.. Check this article out, but I don't think the fo is serious about this tho..

[url=http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10278976]NFL.com - NFL News[/url]

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=GridIron26;335787]Well turns out that the rumor is true.. Check this article out, but I don't think the fo is serious about this tho..

[url=http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story/10278976]NFL.com - NFL News[/url][/QUOTE]

Well maybe the coaches know something we don't. I mean they have seen Strahan up close for the last three years. He's a guy in our division you would think the teams would know hgow he'd fit. Does sound like Bruce Smith 2.0 though.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=DGreene28;335550]This guy has been a pain in the arse for the Redskins for over a decade. If we could get him in here at a resonable price he would be worth it for the two games vs the Giants alone. He is a very vocal leader who could inspire our team the way the Lavar did last year.

If we could make this happen for the right financials then it would be a no brainer... Strahan has enough in the tank to rotate in at DE and stay fresh this season. Plus it would be worth it to see the look on Giants fans when he dons the burgandy and Gold.[/quote]

This guy hs never done that much against us. Jansen has gotten the better of him for most of his career. Yes, he has a lot of sacks, but he's not a great football player. If he had played against Jansen every game, he would have about 10 career sacks.

I do agree that Lavar inspired our team last year, by not playing for us.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;335743]Everyone was saying that Rice is over the hill and his best days have past. Well Michael Strahan is old and washed up. Why would we sign a guy that is 4 years older then Rice. Synder is an idiot, he is killing this team. I would go after Alex Brown or Rice before I would go after Strahan. The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, Brad Johnson, Larry Centers, David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, Lloyd, Randel El,

Believe me Strahan will fit on this list of under acheivers--over paid players that Snyder brought in.

Here's a list of guys we could have made a move for this year.

Darwin Walker, Kris Jenkins, Tank Johnson, Corey Simon, Alex Brown, Kevin Carter, Ian Scott[/QUOTE]

Good post.
I don't think Coles belongs in this group though...he was the best wr we had for many a moon...and he got us Moss.

btw- we can still get Tank Johnson...no one has shown interest in him and he's just sitting around doing nothing.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

I thought hard about Coles and he had one productive season for us. And his last he only had 1 td thrown to him by Clinton Portis for the money he recieved he underachieved. And he was our best reciever because we had Rod Gardner (Who the Redskins got instead of Moss in the first place back in 2001.)

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;335827]I thought hard about Coles and he had one productive season for us. And his last he only had 1 td thrown to him by Clinton Portis for the money he recieved he underachieved. And he was our best reciever because we had Rod Gardner (Who the Redskins got instead of Moss in the first place back in 2001.)[/QUOTE]

Well, Coles was the best WR we have had in many years until Moss. The combo of receptions and yards we haven't seen since...
04- 90 rec, 950 yds. (Coles)
03- 82 rec, 1204 yds. (Coles)
02- 71 rec, 1006 yds. (Rod Gardner)
01- 57 rec, 664 yrds. (Michael Westbrook)
00- 50 rec, 653 yds. (James Thrash)
99- 65 rec, 1191 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
98- 44 rec, 736 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
97- 49 rec, 474 yds. (Jamie Asher)
96- 52 rec, 1014 yds. (Henry Ellard)
95- 56 rec, 1005 yds. (Henry Ellard)
94- 74 rec, 1397 yds. (Henry Ellard)
93- 58 rec, 638 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
92- 64 rec, 912 yds. (Gary Clark)
91- 70 rec, 1340 yds. (Gary Clark)
90- 75 rec, 1112 yds. (Gary Clark)
89- 86 rec, 1186 yds. (Art Monk)
88- 73 rec, 1148 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
87- 56 rec, 1066 yds. (Gary Clark)
86- 74 rec, 1265 yds. (Gary Clark)
85- 91 rec, 1226 yds. (Art Monk)
84- 106 rec, 1372 yds. (Art Monk)

So as you can see, we hadn't seen those kinds of numbers in terms of receptions since Art Monk in the mid 80's. Coles 03 yards we hadn't seen since Ellard in 94.
Coles was the best wr we had seen in a decade, and I would say, the best we have seen since Clark / Monk.
Also, like I said, he helped us get Moss. Moss had 84 rec, for 1483 yards.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=mapod;335499]Very true....the 'Skins should start looking for a solid back up to Ladell Betts...looks like Portis and his gimpy ass knee will be an issue all season.[/quote]

All season?

Someone remind me, how long has training camp been going on? Oh yeah, three days.

I bet it is burning Portis up that his has missed the first few days of camp.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=Grim21Reaper;335848]All season?

Someone remind me, how long has training camp been going on? Oh yeah, three days.

I bet it is burning Portis up that his has missed the first few days of camp.[/QUOTE]

He's fine...he's likely not even injured.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=freddyg12;335508]much worse than that IMO. When Deion was here, he played well, but he was no longer prime time & teams threw his way rather than to champ's side. Strahan is old & coming off injuries, I'm not even sure he would be able to take Daniels' starting job.[/quote]

I can't see Daniels even competing with Strahan. Strahan's not done. His production probems have been caused by injury, not his motor.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

Article by yahoo. SHows how much money he actually needs. He can't retire for life and do nothing.
[url=http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=dw-strahan080207&prov=yhoo&type=lgns]Giant headache - NFL - Yahoo! Sports[/url]

Looks like money is the most important thing to him right now.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=jsarno;335844]Well, Coles was the best WR we have had in many years until Moss. The combo of receptions and yards we haven't seen since...
04- 90 rec, 950 yds. (Coles)
03- 82 rec, 1204 yds. (Coles)
02- 71 rec, 1006 yds. (Rod Gardner)
01- 57 rec, 664 yrds. (Michael Westbrook)
00- 50 rec, 653 yds. (James Thrash)
99- 65 rec, 1191 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
98- 44 rec, 736 yds. (Michael Westbrook)
97- 49 rec, 474 yds. (Jamie Asher)
96- 52 rec, 1014 yds. (Henry Ellard)
95- 56 rec, 1005 yds. (Henry Ellard)
94- 74 rec, 1397 yds. (Henry Ellard)
93- 58 rec, 638 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
92- 64 rec, 912 yds. (Gary Clark)
91- 70 rec, 1340 yds. (Gary Clark)
90- 75 rec, 1112 yds. (Gary Clark)
89- 86 rec, 1186 yds. (Art Monk)
88- 73 rec, 1148 yds. (Ricky Sanders)
87- 56 rec, 1066 yds. (Gary Clark)
86- 74 rec, 1265 yds. (Gary Clark)
85- 91 rec, 1226 yds. (Art Monk)
84- 106 rec, 1372 yds. (Art Monk)

So as you can see, we hadn't seen those kinds of numbers in terms of receptions since Art Monk in the mid 80's. Coles 03 yards we hadn't seen since Ellard in 94.
Coles was the best wr we had seen in a decade, and I would say, the best we have seen since Clark / Monk.
Also, like I said, he helped us get Moss. Moss had 84 rec, for 1483 yards.[/quote]


If we would have drafted Moss in 2001 to begin with instead of Gardner we wouldnt be having this conversation. Coles was not the big name player we wanted him to be for the money we paid him he wasnt consistent. Plus Albert Connell also had 1100 yards that year so in 1999 was the last time we had 2 recievers have legimiate year.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=freddyg12;335508]much worse than that IMO. [B]When Deion was here, he played well[/B], but he was no longer prime time & teams threw his way rather than to champ's side. Strahan is old & coming off injuries, I'm not even sure he would be able to take Daniels' starting job.[/QUOTE]

With all due respect...are kidding me? Neon Deion sucked. I can't recall anything he did that was worthy of the freakin' 8 million he stole from the Redskins. I cringe at the mere mention of him in burgandy & gold.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

no thanks give me some youth ......we need more rockys,lol

i agree we have enough aged players as it is....
now it seems everyone has the flu cause it,s preseason with all these injuries...

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=Dlyne8r;335956]With all due respect...are kidding me? Neon Deion sucked. I can't recall anything he did that was worthy of the freakin' 8 million he stole from the Redskins. I cringe at the mere mention of him in burgandy & gold.[/quote]

Deion did play well here. Was he worth the $$? Probably not, especially since Brian Mitchell was shown the door to clear up the cap room for him. But that's Snyder's fault. Deion took what was offered to him. You can't blame him for that.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=BigSKINBauer;335945]Article by yahoo. SHows how much money he actually needs. He can't retire for life and do nothing.
[URL="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=dw-strahan080207&prov=yhoo&type=lgns"]Giant headache - NFL - Yahoo! Sports[/URL]

Looks like money is the most important thing to him right now.[/quote]

He has only himself to blame. Although the judge went a little overbaoard. If he is giving his ex 15 million then why does she need all that money for child support? Complete BS.

This might turn into OJ 2.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;335743]The possibility of signing Strahan reminds me a lot of when we signed

Barrow, Armstead, Trotter, Deion Sanders, Dan Wilkinson, Dana Stubblefield, Duckett, Brunell, [B]Brad Johnson, Larry Centers,[/B] David Patten, Andre Reed, Troy Vincent, Mike Rumph, Matt Bowen, Trung Canidate, Laveranues Coles, Jeff Posey, [B]Lloyd, Randel El,[/B] [/QUOTE]

Really? Brad Johnson is probably the last good QB the Skins have had. I think Campbell will be better, but Johnson was a great get for them. The problem was the signing of Jeff George, not Brad Johnson.

Larry Centers was also a beast here. He had 544 and 600 yard receiving seasons while he was here as a fullback. By comparison, Cooley's first 2 years here, he had 1088 yards, he has had consecutive 700+ yard seasons, but throwing Centers under the bus is ridiculous. He was also a pretty damn good blocker.

As for Lloyd and Randle El, I think it's a little early to say that these were bad signings. Who knows? Jason Campbell and his ability to actually throw downfield could see these two as legit threats alongside Santana.

While I agree with the majority of your post, I disagree with some of the guys you're using to indict Dan Snyder.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=jdlea;335987]Really? Brad Johnson is probably the last good QB the Skins have had. I think Campbell will be better, but Johnson was a great get for them. The problem was the signing of Jeff George, not Brad Johnson.

Larry Centers was also a beast here. He had 544 and 600 yard receiving seasons while he was here as a fullback. By comparison, Cooley's first 2 years here, he had 1088 yards, he has had consecutive 700+ yard seasons, but throwing Centers under the bus is ridiculous. He was also a pretty damn good blocker.

As for Lloyd and Randle El, I think it's a little early to say that these were bad signings. Who knows? Jason Campbell and his ability to actually throw downfield could see these two as legit threats alongside Santana.

While I agree with the majority of your post, I disagree with some of the guys you're using to indict Dan Snyder.[/QUOTE]

Agreed. Plus, remember that some of these guys we vilify the Redskins for signing really cost us next to nothing the loss was minimal. I'm talking about guys like Reed, Vincent, and Rumph (who incidentally was just cut by the Rams)

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;335989]Agreed. Plus, remember that some of these guys we vilify the Redskins for signing really cost us next to nothing the loss was minimal. I'm talking about guys like Reed, Vincent, and Rumph (who incidentally was just cut by the Rams)[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I agree with that too. Taylor Jacobs for Rumph was a flat out steal. I don't care that Rumph sucked. Jacobs couldn't carry Moss's...hell, Lloyd's jock. That guy has no heart and doesn't belong on an NFL roster. I would have taken a bag of slick 'K' balls for him, but they managed to get Rumph...lol.

As for Vincent, he wasn't good, but what did anyone expect from an in seasons signing? Why not waste a few 100k to see if you can salvage a terrible defense?

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=skinsfan69;335983]He has only himself to blame. Although the judge went a little overbaoard. If he is giving his ex 15 million then why does she need all that money for child support? Complete BS.

This might turn into OJ 2.[/quote]
I think the judge went really overboard. I mean that leaves him with 6 million and he had a prenup. I mean, wtf? THat 6 million goes a lot towards the child support for the next 15 years. I mean, that leaves him with nothing. I'm not going to lie, if i were him i would leave NY or any place i've been for just a little more money. He needs it.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

Someone probably already posted this, but:

[QUOTE]Could holdout Strahan be traded?
Posted: Friday August 03, 2007 11:25AM ET
Some Michael Strahan will retire, others think he will report, but an option that has gone overlooked is the option that could be most viable. The Washington Redskins already have expressed an interest, and other teams also would if the Giants decided to entertain offers. Over time it is expected that they will, but they have made it very clear that they will not restructure Strahan's contract, which could help end this stalemate. Now, the only thing certain is this: The longer Strahan's unholdout holdout lasts, the less likely it is that he will remain as a New York Giant.
[/QUOTE][url=http://fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/17216]FanNation | Truth&Rumors | Could holdout Strahan be traded?[/url]

If we do something stupid trade them a 3rd round pick or something stupid like that I'm going to lose it! I doubt this will happen, but you never know.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=jdlea;335996]Yeah, I agree with that too. Taylor Jacobs for Rumph was a flat out steal. I don't care that Rumph sucked. Jacobs couldn't carry Moss's...hell, Lloyd's jock. That guy has no heart and doesn't belong on an NFL roster. I would have taken a bag of slick 'K' balls for him, but they managed to get Rumph...lol.

[B] As for Vincent, he wasn't good, but what did anyone expect from an in seasons signing? Why not waste a few 100k to see if you can salvage a terrible defense?[/B][/quote]


Well I think that few 100k was worth it, if it wasn't for him we wld have lost TWO games against Cowgirls last season..

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=jdlea;335987]Really? Brad Johnson is probably the last good QB the Skins have had. I think Campbell will be better, but Johnson was a great get for them. The problem was the signing of Jeff George, not Brad Johnson.

Larry Centers was also a beast here. He had 544 and 600 yard receiving seasons while he was here as a fullback. By comparison, Cooley's first 2 years here, he had 1088 yards, he has had consecutive 700+ yard seasons, but throwing Centers under the bus is ridiculous. He was also a pretty damn good blocker.

As for Lloyd and Randle El, I think it's a little early to say that these were bad signings. Who knows? Jason Campbell and his ability to actually throw downfield could see these two as legit threats alongside Santana.

While I agree with the majority of your post, I disagree with some of the guys you're using to indict Dan Snyder.[/quote]


Oops I meant to erase Brad Johnson

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=GridIron26;336003]Well I think that few 100k was worth it, if it wasn't for him we wld have lost TWO games against Cowgirls last season..[/QUOTE]

I agree. I don't think there was any reason to not pick up Vincent when he became available. He was clearly an upgrade over Archuletta and any player who can block a game winner against the Boys is alright by me.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=70Chip;335795]This guy hs never done that much against us. Jansen has gotten the better of him for most of his career. Yes, he has a lot of sacks, but he's not a great football player. If he had played against Jansen every game, he would have about 10 career sacks.

I do agree that Lavar inspired our team last year, by not playing for us.[/quote]

I meant inspire the Giants to pummel us last season. I think you need to go back and look at the tape. Maybe he didn't come up with the big sack # s vs Jansen but we had to re-arrange our whole offense gameplan to negate his pass rush.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

There is NO WAY the skins pick up Strahan....they dont have enough money to give him a raise....I'm not sure of their cap situation....does anyone know?
Im thinking they have 3-4 mil max?

Strahan probably wants 5+, Rice wants the same...
on top of it....Strahan is UNDER CONTRACT...which means we'd have to give the Gmen something else....NO WAY!!
Gibbs will not trade picks at this point...he would have done that earlier in free agency.

We may be able to get Rice for 2.5-3 million if the sky falls....maybe....otherwise, give the money to a backup DE/DT and Cooley

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

I raither take Strahan over Daniels any day.

Plus Mike isn't all that bad he was still effective last year and in 05.But o say if hes price is right that one year so will draft a DE and he can teach him.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

Welcome to the board Sandman

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;336121]Welcome to the board Sandman[/QUOTE]

Tkx bro:)BTW can i see some 2004 high lights cause i was like in a serious Car accident and i missed the whole season:food-smil

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[quote=sandman89;336123]Tkx bro:)BTW can i see some 2004 high lights cause i was like in a serious Car accident and i missed the whole season:food-smil[/quote]

[url=http://www.warpathfilms.com]Redskins Highlight Videos - WarpathFilms.com[/url] at the bottom.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;336130][url=http://www.warpathfilms.com]Redskins Highlight Videos - WarpathFilms.com[/url] at the bottom.[/QUOTE]

lol i mean like good Highlight games:) not like one moment but tkx do.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

I really don't want to see the Skins sign Strahan or Rice. Both are old and declining, and both are just looking for a big payday. If they are really confident in our d-line they need to prove it.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=mooby;336144]I really don't want to see the Skins sign Strahan or Rice. Both are old and declining, and both are just looking for a big payday. If they are really confident in our d-line they need to prove it.[/QUOTE]

U have to think about 2 things do.

1) what if Daniels is still Bad? what if he can't do nothing the whole year and will say"Should have signed a DE.

2)Rice and Strahan will make big plays big money!, or not I think they know they have to go cheap since of there problems /Plus Both are leaders and We................. look at there team They have no characters.


If they came to us I garantee they'll love us -Look how Moss turned out he didn't like the jets and now hes Happy and wants to stay with the skins forvever/

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=sandman89;336146]U have to think about 2 things do.

1) what if Daniels is still Bad? what if he can't do nothing the whole year and will say"Should have signed a DE.

2)Rice and Strahan will make big plays big money!, or not I think they know they have to go cheap since of there problems /Plus Both are leaders and We................. look at there team They have no characters.


If they came to us I garantee they'll love us -Look how Moss turned out he didn't like the jets and now hes Happy and wants to stay with the skins forvever/[/QUOTE]

I didn't understand point #2 at all. Anyone?

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;336149]I didn't understand point #2 at all. Anyone?[/QUOTE]

There both are old and asking big money but it doesn't mean they won't be good.Bruce Smith still did good even at a Old age plus look who we got Daniels at 34 and hes taking some big money also.


So who would u raither have Rice -Strahan or Daniels is is already old and is going to be released by next year?.

We sign RIce than OK all depending of how he does or if Bad than Drafting a DE is good to.But if Strahan comes in than most likely for one year ,than he'll make something happen!what do we have to lose.Will end up with a young DE in the 1st round in 1 or 2 years.

But think about this? We get them now than next draft we won't have to Worry about a DE and could either draft a WR (IF randle el and lloyd suck) OR a Good TE who can block?.

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=sandman89;336150]There both are old and asking big money but it doesn't mean they won't be good.Bruce Smith still did good even at a Old age plus look who we got Daniels at 34 and hes taking some big money also.


So who would u raither have Rice -Strahan or Daniels is is already old and is going to be released by next year?.

We sign RIce than OK all depending of how he does or if Bad than Drafting a DE is good to.But if Strahan comes in than most likely for one year ,than he'll make something happen!what do we have to lose.Will end up with a young DE in the 1st round in 1 or 2 years.

But think about this? We get them now than next draft we won't have to Worry about a DE and could either draft a WR (IF randle el and lloyd suck) OR a Good TE who can block?.[/QUOTE]

Maybe it's because it's late, but I'm just not following you.

Are you saying we should take Rice or Strahan, because even if they ask for a lot of money they are better than what we have, and will make plays. And then next year, since we'll have Rice or Strahan we don't have to worry about DE help in the draft?

Re: Redskins Could Become a Suitor for Strahan?
 

[QUOTE=SmootSmack;336151]Maybe it's because it's late, but I'm just not following you.

Are you saying we should take Rice or Strahan, because even if they ask for a lot of money they are better than what we have, and will make plays. And then next year, since we'll have Rice or Strahan we don't have to worry about DE help in the draft?[/QUOTE]
Yea its like what I said but I mean I think we should sign them if the price is right.

They both know they won't be a Huge bargain now since Rice didn't pass Test and i think he'll end up cheap if he likes Football alot since hes on that way for no signing or retirement.

Strahan knows he might be done and knows hes not that Big anymore but Hopefully i hope he thinks straight.