Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

TJ to Ravens nice move.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

well that sucks

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

I'm kinda shocked, just don't see him being productive in B-more. Boldin, Mason, Clayton, Stallworth, and now Housh. He's probably their 5th WR, and arguably all 4 are better than him at this point so he won't see the field... Here he could've been our #2.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Houshmanzadeh is their number 3 I would think and isn't Stallworth injured???

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Not that big of a loss for us honestly. He's a solid guy but getting old fast . He's lost a step. We really need to jump on VJ but I think Clayton is the more realistic option

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;728650]Not that big of a loss for us honestly. He's a solid guy but getting old fast . He's lost a step. We really need to jump on VJ but I think Clayton is the more realistic option[/quote]

No we don't need to jump on VJ and what is it with you and Mike Clayton??

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;728650]Not that big of a loss for us honestly. He's a solid guy but getting old fast . He's lost a step. We really need to jump on VJ but I think Clayton is the more realistic option[/quote]

I agree we need to make a move at WR but V-Jac is suspended 4 games and Clayton is an underachiever. Housh would've been the guy to get, he did catch 79 balls w/ bad QB play. Bryant could be an option mid season if his knee is healthy, but it looks like we're at least stuck w/ Galloway against Dallas.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;728654]No we don't need to jump on VJ and what is it with you and Mike Clayton??[/quote]

So your saying you would rather have TJ than Jackson? That's insane and as far as Clayton goes, I'm not that high on him but he's a big target and a red zone option that we don't have. Jackson can do it all, Big,Physical,Fast. There is a reason why SD hasn't traded him yet, their not stupid.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

I say we take a look at James Hardy. Another unproductive 2nd round pick from that dreaded 2008 draft. Might be unproductive cuz of Buffalo system. He's 6'5", runs a 4.4. Remember earlier in the offseason, all the talk about Mike Shanahan making Malcolm Kelly the next Brandon Marshall, using him in that role? Or Remember the talk of Kyle Shanahan turning Malcolm Kelly into the next Andre Johnson, moving him all around creating headaches for defenses to cover him? This guy is faster, although has had injury problems, is healthy now. He's a much younger option than Clayton, who hasnt been productive in 6 years.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;728660]So your saying you would rather have TJ than Jackson? That's insane and as far as Clayton goes, I'm not that high on him but he's a big target and a red zone option that we don't have. Jackson can do it all, Big,Physical,Fast. There is a reason why SD hasn't traded him yet, their not stupid.[/quote]

Did I say that? Cause it doesn't look like I said that. I said we don't need to jump on VJ

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Redskins announce the signing of LB Mike Balogun to PS spent preseson with SF.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

Ravens WR Mark Clayton is on the trading block

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=PHazard;728664]I say we take a look at James Hardy. Another unproductive 2nd round pick from that dreaded 2008 draft. Might be unproductive cuz of Buffalo system. [B]He's 6'5", runs a 4.4[/B]. Remember earlier in the offseason, all the talk about Mike Shanahan making Malcolm Kelly the next Brandon Marshall, using him in that role? Or Remember the talk of Kyle Shanahan turning Malcolm Kelly into the next Andre Johnson, moving him all around creating headaches for defenses to cover him? This guy is faster, although has had injury problems, is healthy now. He's a much younger option than Clayton, who hasnt been productive in 6 years.[/quote]

That means nothing. The guy doesn't know how to run routes which is a killer for any receiver. On top of that he has trouble catching the ball in traffic. All his speed is simply straight line as he's slow in and out of cuts (part of the reason he struggles with route running).

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

If MARK Clayton is on the trading block, we should take a hard look at making a deal, making him our #1. I'd bet he would take to being a #1 in M. Shanahans system rather than being the #2 option in Baltimore, with Joe Flacco almost force feeding A Boldin in the Preseason, and with him winning games with under 100 yards passing.....LOL


Is it just me, or does anyone else think that Flacco is so overrated it makes me want to vomit in my mouth, swallow it and barf it back up again?

Seriously, he read my mind when he made this comment. Who knew he would say such things about himself......?

"Quarterbacks get too much credit for wins." -- Joe Flacco, August 2007 ...

Yeah, only you do..........Idiot.

Re: Other teams cuts - and the obvious should we get them question.
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;728681]Ravens WR Mark Clayton is on the trading block[/quote]

I think you mean [URL="http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/17078/ravens-trade-wr-mark-clayton"]Rams WR[/URL] Mark Clayton is off the trading block ;)