![]() |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=skinsfaninok;873806]so here's a Q
Flynn or RG3?[/quote]What are the terms/cost? |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=30gut;873810]What are the terms/cost?[/quote]
Flynn for a 5 year 35 Million RG3 - Trade picks to get him |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=skinsfaninok;873811]Flynn for a 5 year 35 Million
[/quote] :laughing- |
[QUOTE=NC_Skins;873814]:laughing-[/QUOTE]
Is that too low or high? Because Clayton said he's probably going time get between 4 to 6 million a year |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=skinsfaninok;873816]Is that too low or high? Because Clayton said he's probably going time get between 4 to 6 million a year[/quote]
I'm just laughing at any idiot that's going to pay that guy that type of money. Glad it's not going to be us. |
In today's NFL u never know my man teams are desperate
|
[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;873816]Is that too low or high? Because Clayton said he's probably going to get between 4 to 6 million a year[/QUOTE]
Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=NC_Skins;873817]I'm just laughing at any idiot that's going to pay that guy that type of money. Glad it's not going to be us.[/quote]
How much guaranteed is the question. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
It does seem rather pricey for a 2 game....audition
|
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=NC_Skins;873817]I'm just laughing at any idiot that's going to pay that guy that type of money. Glad it's not going to be us.[/quote]
Makes more sense than giving that $$ to a rookie plus the pick. Just sayin'. If we got him plus drafted a rookie in the mid rounds to develop, would you be against that? |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=Mattyk;873831]Makes more sense than giving that $$ to a rookie plus the pick. Just sayin'.
If we got him plus drafted a rookie in the mid rounds to develop, would you be against that?[/quote] No, but would you be against signing Matt Flynn then drafting Justin Blackmon in the first and taking Tannehill or Foles in the 2nd anyways? |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;873839]No, but would you be against signing Matt Flynn then drafting Justin Blackmon in the first and taking Tannehill or Foles in the 2nd anyways?[/quote]
I would have no problem at all with that scenario. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=Mattyk;873840]I would have no problem at all with that scenario.[/quote]
I am thinking that is option 1B in Shanny's mind. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;873839]No, but would you be against signing Matt Flynn then drafting Justin Blackmon in the first and taking Tannehill or Foles in the 2nd anyways?[/quote]Better off doing that exact thing without signing Flynn.
If we're after a non-Grossman veteran, I think there are plenty of more appealing options. If we think Flynn is going to be a top 7 or 8 QB in the NFL (and obviously then the best in the FA class), we should go after him, but I have no idea what we would be basing that on. |
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search
[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;873839]No, but would you be against signing Matt Flynn then drafting Justin Blackmon in the first and taking Tannehill or Foles in the 2nd anyways?[/quote]
What would we be giving up for Flynn? A 3rd? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.