Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=MissouriSkin;1278166]Glanville was and always will be a clown. Notice how everyone talks about his sayings and his personality and never his talent as a coach. That’s because he didn’t have any.[/quote]

he was a bit of a clown, but to me he wasn't a bad coach. he fielded some really good teams both in atlanta and w/ the oilers.

guys like glanville and buddy ryan helped make the NFL a truly great league back in those days. you needed guys like them ( and also gibbs and walsh types) to help create true rivals. now it's all about clean cut mcvay look a likes. it's not the same and never will be.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1278167]he was a bit of a clown, but to me he wasn't a bad coach. he fielded some really good teams both in atlanta and w/ the oilers.

guys like glanville and buddy ryan helped make the NFL a truly great league back in those days. you needed guys like them ( and also gibbs and walsh types) to help create true rivals. [B]now it's all about clean cut mcvay look a likes. it's not the same and never will be.[/B][/quote]

Detroit Lions would like to challenge this point. You see their new guy's press conference?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvMLEkgXMAM9M_o?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

I'm sorry but if you think this is better than WFT you need to root for arena football...

That shit is awful

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1278177][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvMLEkgXMAM9M_o?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

I'm sorry but if you think this is better than WFT you need to root for arena football...

That shit is awful[/quote]

Any name will be awful if you give them a logo that looks like a sunshine and tag spray paint lettering.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1278177][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvMLEkgXMAM9M_o?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

I'm sorry but if you think this is better than WFT you need to root for arena football...

That shit is awful[/quote]

Well that’s your opinion. I like that name and that logo. But it doesn’t matter because I have Redskins gear to last me til I die.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=skinsfaninok;1278177][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvMLEkgXMAM9M_o?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]



I'm sorry but if you think this is better than WFT you need to root for arena football...



That shit is awful[/QUOTE]My opinion the lettering could go but the logo and name would be great. I don't get the disdain?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

I'd prefer Washington Wolves. Keep the W and our colors. Hail to the pack.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1278183]I'd prefer Washington Wolves. Keep the W and our colors. Hail to the pack.[/QUOTE]Wouldnt mind wolves at all. Some sort of double W would work as a logo for that too

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

What's the word on Thaddeus Moss? I actually forgot about him. It would be nice if he could step in and surprise much like Logan Thomas did last year. He's had a year to sit back and learn the playbook. Seems like some thought he was a steal, and others thought his skill set was limited... I haven't heard anything on his progress from the foot fracture. Did he have surgery?

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=sdskinsfan2001;1278183]I'd prefer Washington Wolves. Keep the W and our colors. Hail to the pack.[/QUOTE]


Washington Wolves would be better than Redwolves IMO. I think they need to get the color Red out all together. We were Redskins , no need to be “Red” anymore. The HTTR is in the past let it be

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;1278177][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvMLEkgXMAM9M_o?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]

I'm sorry but if you think this is better than WFT you need to root for arena football...

That shit is awful[/quote]

let it go. redwolves is not going to happen.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1278190]let it go. redwolves is not going to happen.[/quote]

I'd be okay with Washington Wolves

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=VTSkins1961;1278191]I'd be okay with Washington Wolves[/quote]

I think if Washington Wolves is the best we can do we might as well stick with the dumb Football Team name.

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[QUOTE=skinsfan69;1278167]he was a bit of a clown, but to me he wasn't a bad coach. he fielded some really good teams both in atlanta and w/ the oilers.

guys like glanville and buddy ryan helped make the NFL a truly great league back in those days. you needed guys like them ( and also gibbs and walsh types) to help create true rivals. now it's all about clean cut mcvay look a likes. it's not the same and never will be.[/QUOTE]


I don’t think Glanville or Ryan are anywhere near the same caliber as Gibbs. Want to mention Walsh, Knoll, Parcells, or even Landry in the same sentence - fine. But Glanville and Ryan? No way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread
 

[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1278135]Pretty sure that mediocre offensive line was ranked #6 in the league last year. I doubt the plan is to start over...[/quote]

We got routinely owned by better teams, on pass rush especially. We beat one winning team, and one reason (of many) that better teams beat us is we couldn't block the more elite rushers.