Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

I say we end up drafting 5th with Minny, St.Louis, Indy and tampa ahead of us. I think that every one of those teams is fine at the QB position, but Indy WILL take Luck. So the question is, will Tampa take one qb, or will both great qbs drop to the 5th pick, giving us our choice?

Point is, if we end up with Matthew Barkley as our signal caller coming out of the 2012 draft, this draft was a great one. If we end up without him and RG3 turns out to be our qb, then it still will be a good draft. But if we do not get either of them, and Shanny takes a chance on "his" type of guy, say in the 2nd round in order to groom him and such, then I am not so sure...........I wouldnt hate to see Tannehill running our O, shit, he would be better than what we have right now the first day he stepped onto the field, AS A ROOKIE. If that is Shannys direction, then who could you see him rolling with in the first round if he targets tannehill in the 2nd? Would it be a WR? Or would he go OLine?

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

Or, would he, and I know this would not be very popular in DC right now, but, could he say "**** it Im going D", and ignore the offense for say a shut down corner, or the stud MLB we need to complete our corps?

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

To me if we dont go qb in the first which would be stupid as hell if we have our choice of rg or bark then we go Claiborne or Trent Richardson.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

308/446 69.1% 3528 yards 39 TDs 7 INTs
261/373 70% 3170 yards 35 TDs 9 INTs

These are the season's stats for two QBs, both in the Pac-12. You may be surprised as to which one is which.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

Idk Richardson wouldn't be my first choice. I say if no QB or no guard either Claiborne or Vontae Burfect. Both are defensive beasts and would be studs in our defense.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=itvnetop;865779]308/446 69.1% 3528 yards 39 TDs 7 INTs
261/373 70% 3170 yards 35 TDs 9 INTs

These are the season's stats for two QBs, both in the Pac-12. You may be surprised as to which one is which.[/quote]



Andrew Luck with the 70% and Barkley with the more TDs and ints

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=musicmaster45;865781]Idk Richardson wouldn't be my first choice. I say if no QB or no guard either Claiborne or Vontae Burfect. Both are defensive beasts and would be studs in our defense.[/quote]

Passing on a talent like Richardson if no qbs are on the board could be like passing on Peterson for Landry. Richardson is a monster and while I love Helu and think he will be a great running back, Trent Richardson will be a special player.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

We need a QB so bad I say we go QB in round one and QB in round 5-7 for insurance
Like we did when we got Heath Shular and Good ol Gus F back in the day.
I vote RGIII in round 1 and either Austin Parish or Ryan Lindley in round 5 or 6
Hell I wouldn't be opposed to getting RGIII in round one and Tannehill in round 2 and have them battle for the job Shanahan style

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=mauiRedskinbarn;865784]We need a QB so bad I say we go QB in round one and QB in round 5-7 for insurance
Like we did when we got Heath Shular and Good ol Gus F back in the day.
I vote RGIII in round 1 and either Austin Parish or Ryan Lindley in round 5 or 6
Hell I wouldn't be opposed to getting RGIII in round one and Tannehill in round 2 and have them battle for the job Shanahan style[/quote]

I would break Shanny's arms if he went RGIII in rd 1 then Tannehill in rd 2

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;865782]Andrew Luck with the 70% and Barkley with the more TDs and ints[/quote]

Um, you may want to check those stats again. The guy with more TDs has [I]less[/I] INTs than the other guy.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=itvnetop;865788]Um, you may want to check those stats again. The guy with more TDs has [I]less[/I] INTs than the other guy.[/quote]

my bad wasnt paying attention but Barkley with the more tds fewer picks and luck with the 70% comp.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

I think we should draft Barkley 5th overall, and trade up to 7th to draft RGIII as an insurance policy. We can trade whichever one doesn't do as well like Philly has been doing with their second QB's.... :)

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

Bark's now been snubbed for a Heisman finalist invite... with superior numbers over Luck (except for a completion percentage less than 1 percent lower), this may be one more reason he'd stay. Heisman, Natty, 2013 overall #1. Going for the Cam Newton triple.

Or take the money now and get to DC, please.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;865785]I would break Shanny's arms if he went RGIII in rd 1 then Tannehill in rd 2[/quote]
Don't worry he wont. What I would like to see is Shanny to get someone like Mat Moore or Mat Flynn, and Barkley or RGIII or who ever he rally wants, in the first round. I like Nick Foles as my back up to Barkley, but I think Shannahan will make a good choice drafting a QB. So I will trust in his choice, especialy after seeing Gabbert. I know he was not ready to be in a pro system, but they said the same thing about Newton.

Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
 

[quote=T.O.Killa;865796]Don't worry he wont. What I would like to see is Shanny to get someone like Mat Moore or Mat Flynn, and Barkley or RGIII or who ever he rally wants, in the first round. I like Nick Foles as my back up to Barkley, but I think Shannahan will make a good choice drafting a QB. So I will trust in his choice, especialy after seeing Gabbert. I know he was not ready to be in a pro system, but they said the same thing about Newton.[/quote]

I know he won't.