Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Theory: Putting together a staff for the future (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=22188)

SFREDSKIN 01-26-2008 03:13 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
Olivadotti just signed an extension, thank god. Read the JLC insider.

That Guy 01-26-2008 03:16 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
i think synder just wants a coach he can control and dictate to, instead of one that would actually want to make sound decisions on free agents and trades.

Ruhskins 01-26-2008 03:18 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
Hmm.. that would be a young coordinator who hasn't been a head coach.

Chief X_Phackter 01-26-2008 03:20 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[quote=The Gremlin;413297]um if he kept Gregg the defensive staff is intact and if he kept Saunders so was most of the offensive staff. Too bad the Skins will be rebuilding now but I like the Blache move. At least someone deserving for once gets a promotion.[/quote]

I wouldn't call this rebuilding. More like remodeling.

WillH 01-26-2008 03:25 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
Matty and SmootSmack, I think you guys are right on with what you've said in this thread. You've tried to calm the masses, but it doesn't seem like its working (big surprise!).

Do you think there is someone lined up already? Just a couple options? Or are they still playing the entire field?

Ruhskins 01-26-2008 03:26 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=WillH;413313]Matty and SmootSmack, I think you guys are right on with what you've said in this thread. You've tried to calm the masses, but it doesn't seem like its working (big surprise!).

Do you think there is someone lined up already? Just a couple options? Or are they still playing the entire field?[/QUOTE]

They have to have someone already. Otherwise they'd be gambling that either the Giants' DC or the Pats OC would be willing to sign on as HC with the coordinators already in place.

SFREDSKIN 01-26-2008 03:29 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=Ruhskins;413314]They have to have someone already. Otherwise they'd be gambling that either the Giants' DC or the Pats OC would be willing to sign on as HC with the coordinators already in place.[/QUOTE]

Not only that, do you think either one of those guys wants a built in staff or build their own? Sounds like they already made their choice and it's probably Fassel.

SouperMeister 01-26-2008 03:29 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;413302]Olivadotti just signed an extension, thank god. Read the JLC insider.[/quote]Naming Blache D-coordinator and this move are good signs toward maintaining continuity on the D. I was hoping that we could also retain Jerry Gray, but I can definitely see him following Williams to Jacksonville, assuming Williams lands there fairly quickly.

I still maintain that naming offensive and defensive coordinators before the head coach severely limits the head coaching options.

SFREDSKIN 01-26-2008 03:31 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=SouperMeister;413317]Naming Blache D-coordinator and this move are good signs toward maintaining continuity on the D. I was hoping that we could also retain Jerry Gray, but I can definitely see him following Williams to Jacksonville, assuming Williams lands there fairly quickly.

I still maintain that naming offensive and defensive coordinators before the head coach severely limits the head coaching options.[/QUOTE]

I would like to see Schwartz before Fassel.

SmootSmack 01-26-2008 03:33 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=SFREDSKIN;413302]Olivadotti just signed an extension, thank god. Read the JLC insider.[/QUOTE]

Well, that's good.

Ruhskins 01-26-2008 03:34 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=SFREDSKIN;413316]Not only that, do you think either one of those guys wants a built in staff or build their own? Sounds like they already made their choice and it's probably Fassel.[/QUOTE]

If that's the case, that's going to be an interesting press conference. I say people should protest. LOL.

SC Skins Fan 01-26-2008 03:34 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;413318]I would like to see Schwartz before Fassel.[/quote]

Interesting tidbit in JLC's latest blog. Says that the Titans have contacted the Skins for permission to talk to Williams. I can't imagine he'd go there to work under Schwartz would he?

Think it is between Fassel and Spagnolo though. I do feel better that at least they have told G. Williams he's out officially. Seems like maybe they could have done that a bit sooner, but better that both parties made a move (and maybe Williams initiated it).

[URL="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2008/01/someone_asked_about_the_other.html"]Someone asked about the other assistants - Redskins Insider[/URL]
[FONT=Times New Roman,times,serif] UPDATE 1: Jason LaCanfora reports that the Rams and Raiders have asked the Redskins for permission to speak with Saunders about jobs and the Rams and Titans have asked for permission to speak to Williams about jobs, sources said. Apparently, teams still must do this because the two remain under contract.[/FONT]

SmootSmack 01-26-2008 03:35 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=SouperMeister;413317]Naming Blache D-coordinator and this move are good signs toward maintaining continuity on the D. I was hoping that we could also retain Jerry Gray, but I can definitely see him following Williams to Jacksonville, assuming Williams lands there fairly quickly.

I still maintain that naming offensive and defensive coordinators before the head coach severely limits the head coaching options.[/QUOTE]

There'd have to be a spot on the Jags' roster for Gray though, wouldn't there?

Defensewins 01-26-2008 03:38 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=WillH;413313]Matty and SmootSmack, I think you guys are right on with what you've said in this thread. You've tried to calm the masses, but it doesn't seem like its working (big surprise!).

Do you think there is someone lined up already? Just a couple options? Or are they still playing the entire field?[/QUOTE]

Is Matty Dan Snyder and Smootsmack Vinny Cerrato in disguise? Is it their responsiblity to calm the masses? Or are they getting paid by the skins to sell the company line? Just kind of weird that they always defend the Redskins moves.

Ruhskins 01-26-2008 03:39 PM

Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
 
[QUOTE=SC Skins Fan;413321]Interesting tidbit in JLC's latest blog. Says that the Titans have contacted the Skins for permission to talk to Williams. I can't imagine he'd go there to work under Schwartz would he?

Think it is between Fassel and Spagnolo though. I do feel better that at least they have told G. Williams he's out officially. Seems like maybe they could have done that a bit sooner, but better that both parties made a move (and maybe Williams initiated it).

[URL="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2008/01/someone_asked_about_the_other.html"]Someone asked about the other assistants - Redskins Insider[/URL]
[FONT=Times New Roman,times,serif] UPDATE 1: Jason LaCanfora reports that the Rams and Raiders have asked the Redskins for permission to speak with Saunders about jobs and the Rams and Titans have asked for permission to speak to Williams about jobs, sources said. Apparently, teams still must do this because the two remain under contract.[/FONT][/QUOTE]


Wait...isn't Schwartz the Def coord? If so why are the Titans asking about G Williams??


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.99968 seconds with 9 queries