Re: Colt getting some time at #2?
 

Can't blame Zorn. Probably wants to see him go up against at least second stringers instead of just fodder. I don't think this means anything toward actual depth chart..

Re: Colt getting some time at #2?
 

[quote=Mattyk72;462697]Exactly.

It's hilarious to see people question JC, but on the other hand are so convinced that an unproven rookie is somehow the answer. Simply retarded.[/quote]

Patrick Ramsey. :)



It's like the Patrick Ramsey discussions all over again. :D

Hopefully Colt can do something Ramsey never could...get better with experience.

Re: Colt getting some time at #2?
 

[quote=Ruhskins;462659]Redskins gave up three picks, including a first-rounder to move up in the draft to get Campbell. Given how much we have valued draft picks this past year, I would say that's a lot of investment to give up on him and turn our offense over to a rookie Qb. We might as well be in rebuilding mode if we do that.[/quote]

Not to mention we invested 3 picks in the second round this year so Campbell can have more weapons in this offense. We've invested a lot in Campbell, I mean the reason Zorn was first hired was to help Campbell out, so it wouldn't make sense to just give up on him after all that.

Re: Colt getting some time at #2?
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;462697]Exactly.

It's hilarious to see people question JC, but on the other hand are so convinced that an unproven rookie is somehow the answer. Simply retarded.[/QUOTE]

I never said Colt was a top eight Qb either..But i did say he'll be one of the future. And not to discount JC's skills i just know more and trust Colt because I've followed him since High School. Both may be a force to reckon with but its amazing how Espn's First Take said the same exact comment today.

Re: Colt getting some time at #2?
 

Where's office when you need him?