Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Dockery Cut: (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=28590)

SC Skins Fan 02-26-2009 11:55 AM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=SmootSmack;530194]This could be like Fred Smoot all over again (leave for big money, get humbled, and come home)[/quote]

But hopefully he can play better than Smoot.

The Goat 02-26-2009 11:59 AM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=SmootSmack;530194]This could be like Fred Smoot all over again (leave for big money, get humbled, and come home)[/quote]

... u don't mean Dock will be half the player he was the first time around right?

JoeRedskin 02-26-2009 12:04 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=Ruhskins;530189]If you mean Crowder, the LB from Miami, he re-signed with the Dolphins yesterday.[/quote]

I actually meant Angelo Crowell from Buffalo.

Ruhskins 02-26-2009 12:07 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=JoeRedskin;530200]I actually meant Angelo Crowell from Buffalo.[/quote]

Gotcha.


SmootSmack, what are your thoughts about Dockery, think the team would go for him?

LandrySlice 02-26-2009 12:31 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
They are definetly going to make a play for Dockery, but if this thing with Haynesworth has any teeth to it, forget about Dockery, Haynesworth, and Hall. IMPOSSIBLE!

Eknox 02-26-2009 12:39 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
Oh yeah come on home ...what's up Doc?

Skinny Tee 02-26-2009 12:41 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=LandrySlice;530221]They are definetly going to make a play for Dockery, but if this thing with Haynesworth has any teeth to it, forget about Dockery, Haynesworth, and Hall. IMPOSSIBLE![/quote]

The thing is if you can give them all long deals and focus their newly signed contracts to be minimized year one then you can sign all of these guys.

If they are gambling on the cap not being there next year it won't matter how they loophole the first year cost and stipulate their payments in the second year.


It really looks like they are just trying to acquire all the talent this year regardless of cost in preparation of there being no cap next year. It's smart but it is an aggressive gamble.

SmootSmack 02-26-2009 12:45 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
I would think the Skins would at least show interest in Dock, they should.

Hog1 02-26-2009 12:48 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
Interest would be GREAT!
I just don't want it to be attached to a ride in "Redskin 1" and an $88m check

Larry Michael is Satan 02-26-2009 12:50 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=Skinny Tee;530228]The thing is if you can give them all long deals and focus their newly signed contracts to be minimized year one then you can sign all of these guys.

If they are gambling on the cap not being there next year it won't matter how they loophole the first year cost and stipulate their payments in the second year.


It really looks like they are just trying to acquire all the talent this year regardless of cost in preparation of there being no cap next year. It's smart but it is an aggressive gamble.[/quote]


If I was a player/agent, I wouldn't be eager to sign a contract that has terms based on an assumption of no salary cap.

Sign Dock and Hall, be realistic and forget about Haynesworth. He'll probably be a Buc, and be a good player for a while, but why give a player who is going to be out of his prime in 2-3 years a long term contract tying up that much money? It's stupid, but so is Vinny.

Ruhskins 02-26-2009 01:18 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=SmootSmack;530233]I would think the Skins would at least show interest in Dock, they should.[/quote]

Looks like they are listening to you....

[url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2009/02/skins_expected_to_go_after_doc.html]Skins Expected to Go After Dockery - Redskins Insider[/url]

GMScud 02-26-2009 01:21 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=Ruhskins;530247]Looks like they are listening to you....

[URL="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/2009/02/skins_expected_to_go_after_doc.html"]Skins Expected to Go After Dockery - Redskins Insider[/URL][/quote]

Good to hear. It's a logical fit. I he comes back, I wonder if we'll let Kendall walk...

MTK 02-26-2009 01:35 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
Great news to hear the team wants Dockery back. I hope he's on Redskins One in the am.

BigHairedAristocrat 02-26-2009 01:38 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=GMScud;530249]Good to hear. It's a logical fit. I he comes back, I wonder if we'll let Kendall walk...[/quote]

I think we let Kendall walk if we think Jansen can be a good backup guard/Tackle.

If we get Dock, I think we can completely turn our offensive line around in two years:

[B][U]2009 Starters[/U][/B]
LT: Samuels
LG: Dockery
C: Rabach
RG: Thomas
RT: Andre Smith (worth the risk if he's there at 13)

[B][U]2009 Backups[/U][/B]
Heyer - T
Jansen - G, T
Rinehart - G
Geisinger - C

[B][U]2010 Starters[/U][/B]
LT: Smith
LG: Dockery
C: Geisinger/UFA/Draft Pick
RG: Rinehart/UFA/Draft Pick
RT: Samuels

BigHairedAristocrat 02-26-2009 01:40 PM

Re: Dockery Cut:
 
[quote=Mattyk72;530258]Great news to hear the team wants Dockery back. I hope he's on Redskins One in the am.[/quote]

Before or after it makes a stop in Nashville?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.89604 seconds with 9 queries