Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=skinsfaninok;656341]No because Betts is Old and had a bad knee injury.. Our best bet for good picks is trading 47.[/quote]

You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;656343]From what team? Vinny isn't working these days.[/quote]
the browns rams raiders bills 49ers teams that do not want to give the 1st round pick on a QB but need one

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=Ruhskins;656345]You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.[/quote]

I prefer Clausen over Bradford

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=Redskin301;656346]the browns rams raiders bills 49ers teams that do not want to give the 1st round pick on a QB but need one[/quote]He also has, at most, a year left on his contract. So those teams might be inclined to just wait until he is a FA rather than giving up a 2nd.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=sportscurmudgeon;656342]Sounds good - - if only it were correct. And it is not....[/quote]

he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=wolfeskins;656358]he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.[/quote]
are offer was 2 first and Jcam the bears gave orton two 1st and a 3rd

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=wolfeskins;656358]he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.[/quote]

Well McD sort of chose Orton over Cutler too.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;656351]He also has, at most, a year left on his contract. So those teams might be inclined to just wait until he is a FA rather than giving up a 2nd.[/quote]

He's a RFA if thers no CBA

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=wolfeskins;656358]he wasn't? we still have campbell, the bears have cutler and the broncos have orton. i call that choosing orton over campbell. if denver thought campbell was better than orton they would have accepted our offer.[/quote]

If that is what you call it and if you ignore all of the rest of the parts of the deal that went down, that is a good indication as to why there aren't a half-dozen NFL teams knocking down your doors to make you their Director of Player Personnel or their GM.


It was [B]NEVER[/B] a choice of Cutler/Campbell/Orton. If it were that simple, Danny Boy would have bid higher in terms of money for the three of them and gotten Orotn - - whom the Skins lusted after - - than the notoriously cheap Bears. This was a deal that Danny Boy's money could not make all by itself.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

Another team would get better value by trading for him and we would get worse value in trading him away.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=Redskin301;656366]He's a RFA if thers no CBA[/quote]I know, that's why I said "at most, a year."

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;656372]I know, that's why I said "at most, a year."[/quote]

That shoud be more attractive to teams that he has no big contract

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=sportscurmudgeon;656369]If that is what you call it and if you ignore all of the rest of the parts of the deal that went down, [B]that is a good indication as to why there aren't a half-dozen NFL teams knocking down your doors to make you their Director of Player Personnel or their GM.[/B]


It was [B]NEVER[/B] a choice of Cutler/Campbell/Orton. If it were that simple, Danny Boy would have bid higher in terms of money for the three of them and gotten Orotn - - whom the Skins lusted after - - than the notoriously cheap Bears. This was a deal that Danny Boy's money could not make all by itself.[/quote]

so, have you sued those bastards for knocking yours down.

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=Ruhskins;656345]You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.[/quote]

Cc is a 2 time PB player so yea I think ee could get picks for him. As far as Bradford goes, he is still projected as the number 1 qb, so it wouldn't be so dumb to draft him . You can have jc who has a horrible record

Re: Jason campbells trade value
 

[quote=Ruhskins;656345]You mean our tight end who had a foot injury? Solid.

I still think this whole "let's trade Cooley" thing is laughable. Just as laughable as the notion of drafting a QB with a twice-injured shoulder with the #4.[/quote]

If NE can get a 1st for Seymour we can get at least a 2nd for Cooley. There will be a team that drafts Bradford/McCoy/Clausen and they will look for a reliable target for him to grow with. ala Falcons.