Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals) (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=44175)

Bucket 09-19-2011 01:57 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
If we stall out in the redzone against Dallas, we will get slaughtered. We wont be able to keep up with their offense.

GTripp0012 09-19-2011 01:58 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
Cofield was one on one with Sendlein a lot in the first half in pass rush, and never really made an impact.

12thMan 09-19-2011 02:00 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
When I looked at the stat sheet, Cofield was the only Dlineman with a tackle. Also, I think time of possession was somewhat of a factor. We nearly doubled their TOP.

Ruhskins 09-19-2011 02:00 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=The Goat;837706]Smackdown on Haslett. I think our defensive scheme was lackluster in the 2nd half. Kolb had a terrible 1st half and our secondary played relatively well early in the game. We should have come out (defensively) in the 3rd quarter expecting them to try to pound the pigskin w/ Wells, as they did. We should have put more guys in the box and not let them get anything going. Something is up w/ the right side defensively as most of the big gains on the ground seem to go there. Orakpo struggling in run defense/containment? Doughty? Hard for me to say.

Also within the defense Cofield looked very average today i.e. no impact out there. Why didn't Nield get more action today?[/quote]

I think in the second half, the Cards took advantage of our banged up secondary to run the ball. They came out several times in the spread, and given the status of the secondary, we didn't pressure much and defended the pass trying to contain Fitz. Of course, they ran the ball very well against our spread defense. If Wilson doesn't get hurt, we probably do a better job against the run.

Although NTs are not supposed to be flashy on a 3-4, I do agree with you that Cofield has looked very average. I'd be curious to see what the folks that review the games can say about his play. I just hated seeing getting manhandled by the Giants' rookie center last week.

Dirtbag59 09-19-2011 02:24 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=Mattyk;837381]What's up with these scab threads? Boo[/quote]

Well I approached Smoot and Scud week after week and said "dudes you got put an R or a TM at the end of your thread title." And they were like "dude no way" and I was like "but DUDE you got to protect your brand."

Why do you think Coke sends hit squads to peoples houses that are ruining their business?

Swarley 09-19-2011 02:43 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=Ruhskins;837711]I think in the second half, the Cards took advantage of our banged up secondary to run the ball. They came out several times in the spread, and given the status of the secondary, we didn't pressure much and defended the pass trying to contain Fitz. Of course, they ran the ball very well against our spread defense. If Wilson doesn't get hurt, we probably do a better job against the run.
[/quote]


I agree completely, sometimes you gotta give credit to the other teams play caller.

GTripp0012 09-19-2011 02:50 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
If it felt like Cofield did little in this game, thats partially because he didn't play a whole lot.

But Arizona could pass as much as they wanted as long as they could block him one on one.

GTripp0012 09-19-2011 02:56 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=The Goat;837706]Smackdown on Haslett. I think our defensive scheme was lackluster in the 2nd half. Kolb had a terrible 1st half and our secondary played relatively well early in the game. We should have come out (defensively) in the 3rd quarter expecting them to try to pound the pigskin w/ Wells, as they did. We should have put more guys in the box and not let them get anything going. Something is up w/ the right side defensively as most of the big gains on the ground seem to go there. Orakpo struggling in run defense/containment? Doughty? Hard for me to say.[/quote]Arizona ran 3 times in the first half, so if Haslett was going to think they would come out and try to shove it down our throats, he would have been totally guessing. I don't like it when halftime adjustments are total guesses in the dark.

The truth, in my opinion, is because the onus was on the Cardinals offense to change its approach, the Redskins needed to have more than a 3 point lead at half and kicking off based on the way they dominated. It's too easy to go in at half and find one thing about the defense you can attack.

The Cardinals did win the halftime adjustments, but that's to be expected when the Redskins were utterly schematically dominant in the first half. The only place to go for the Cards coaches was up, despite the score.

GTripp0012 09-19-2011 03:13 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
Hightower isn't as good in pass protection as we've all been lead to believe. He's adequate at best, but he doesn't exactly go and stick people.

diehard 09-19-2011 06:59 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
Tsk, tsk.

CrustyRedskin 09-19-2011 07:47 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=44ever;837285][IMG]http://static.nfl.com/static/content/catch_all/nfl_image/k_kolb_110918_PG.jpg[/IMG] WAPOW!!!![/quote]


Welcome to DC.

jrsz24 09-19-2011 08:45 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=Bucket;837708]If we stall out in the redzone against Dallas, we will get slaughtered. We wont be able to keep up with their offense.[/quote]

What offense? Romo hurt, Jones hurt, and Austin out. Bryant also hurt. We should be able to beat them. F Dallas.

MTK 09-19-2011 08:51 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=CrustyRedskin;837746]Welcome to DC.[/quote]

man, that's a shot, he got decked by Fletcher too on that long bomb to Fitz.

Ruhskins 09-19-2011 09:49 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=GTripp0012;837720]If it felt like Cofield did little in this game, thats partially because he didn't play a whole lot.

But Arizona could pass as much as they wanted as long as they could block him one on one.[/quote]

This is concerning me a little bit because I was never a believer in Cofield as our NT. I think he'd be a helluva DE, but not a NT. I hope he improves, because his job is to take on two blockers and allow our LBs to go for the kill. I think his performance has been disguised a bit by Haslett's scheming and the great pass rush created by Rak and Kerrigan.

44ever 09-19-2011 10:02 AM

Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
 
[quote=Ruhskins;837784]This is concerning me a little bit because I was never a believer in Cofield as our NT. I think he'd be a helluva DE, but not a NT. I hope he improves, because his job is to take on two blockers and allow our LBs to go for the kill. [B]I think his performance has been disguised a bit by Haslett's scheming and the great pass rush created by Rak and Kerrigan.[/B][/quote]

Good assessment here RUh.

Personally I think we are ok with Cofield as long as he steadly improves but once again, were playing NT unnaturally.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.00842 seconds with 9 queries