Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=freddyg12;860258]At FS I take it? I know they intended to play him at FS when he was drafted, but man that's a big jump for him. Can't see that playin Romo & co. this week. Seems more a SS. Instincts seem good though, he's a ball player if nothing else.[/quote]

Well I think if Landry is out on Sunday it could be Atogwe and Gomes starting. Maybe

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;859919]They came very very close to starting Gomes last week.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, but what if we had gone with Allen's choice and drafted Eric Berry? No idea who our left tackle would be[/quote]


Heyer? ....LOLOLOLOL



Also, Berry would be on the IR right now so we'd be down a safety and a decent LT.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Paintrain;859818]I hope he doesn't take the wrong angle towards the exit door of Redskins Park.[/quote]

:laughing2 That's awesome!

As to the thread...meh. I mean, I rooted for him; more because he was young than because I thought he was going to be awesome. That's about the most I can say for Kareem More.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=SmootSmack;860266]Well I think if Landry is out on Sunday it could be Atogwe and Gomes starting. Maybe[/quote]

Wait, what's wrong with Landry?

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Ruhskins;860278]Wait, what's wrong with Landry?[/quote]


Achilles.


[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/post/quick-hits-london-fletcher-laron-landry-miss-practice-with-injuries/2011/11/16/gIQA9COsRN_blog.html]Quick hits: London Fletcher, LaRon Landry miss practice with injuries - The Insider - The Washington Post[/url]

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=Ruhskins;860278]Wait, what's wrong with Landry?[/quote]

coverage skills.

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=That Guy;860285]coverage skills.[/quote]

[YT]bcYppAs6ZdI[/YT]

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

how about

No moore kareem of the crop

Re: No Moore Kareem
 

[quote=That Guy;860285]coverage skills.[/quote]

And tackling and talks smack when other team makes a play. He is a Sean Taylor divided by a thousand.