Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   RGIII Heisman Winner (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=45636)

SmootSmack 12-11-2011 01:26 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=Defensewins;866769]I notice on some of the highlights of RGIII he is wearing a knee brace. Does he have a bad knee?[/quote]

Believe he missed most of 2009 with a torn ACL

sdskinsfan2001 12-11-2011 02:04 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
RGIII is an improved version of Jake Locker.

Barkley is an improved version of Mark Sanchez.

Either one of those quarterbacks make us a much better team. All things being equal I want RGIII because he has the higher ceiling and it would be awesome to have such an exciting player on our team. I'm look forward to 2012 season. I'm thinking we have a shot at the playoffs.

diehard 12-11-2011 05:24 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=Giantone;866736]...why not?[/quote]

Some team has to wake up and smell the coffee and realize there's more of sure thing drafting an OT or CB with either of those picks. I think the only way they go back to back is because of a trade.

SFREDSKIN 12-11-2011 07:32 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=sdskinsfan2001;866893]RGIII is an improved version of Jake Locker.

Barkley is an improved version of Mark Sanchez.

Either one of those quarterbacks make us a much better team. All things being equal I want RGIII because he has the higher ceiling and it would be awesome to have such an exciting player on our team. I'm look forward to 2012 season. I'm thinking we have a shot at the playoffs.[/quote]

Barkley is heads above Sanchez. Everyone knocks on Sanchez but he wins when has to. I'd take Sanchez in a heart beat.

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 08:36 PM

^ and you'd have JC all over again no thanks

SFREDSKIN 12-11-2011 08:41 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;867206]^ and you'd have JC all over again no thanks[/quote]

Not even close. Look at Sanchez record during the season and playoffs.

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 08:56 PM

We are talking overall player not record.. JC was on a shit team his whole career mark has a loaded roster to work with Huge difference. Sanchez will never lead a team to a SB win he's a better Rex grossman that's it

SFREDSKIN 12-11-2011 08:59 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;867214]We are talking overall player not record.. JC was on a shit team his whole career mark has a loaded roster to work with Huge difference. Sanchez will never lead a team to a SB win he's a better Rex grossman that's it[/quote]

I'll take that bet. His numbers have improved every year, last year in the playoffs he was great, remember he's in his 3rd year with no training camp.

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 09:05 PM

Weak arm and avg at best career numbers, he wasn't worth his draft pick, yeah he's won as a starter but so has Rex big deal. I'd take 15 QBs in the league today over him

SFREDSKIN 12-11-2011 09:06 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;867220]Weak arm and avg at best career numbers, he wasn't worth his draft pick, yeah he's won as a starter but so has Rex big deal. I'd take 15 QBs in the league today over him[/quote]

Just curious, who would you take? Manning, Brees, Brady, etc. don't count.

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 09:11 PM

They have to count lol

2 mannings
Brees
Rodgers
Romo
Ben
Flacco
Vick
Newton
Cutler
Schaub
Ryan
Rivers
Palmer
Bradford

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 09:13 PM

Sanchez is avg man nothing special and his numbers show it, and thats with really good players around him

SFREDSKIN 12-11-2011 09:21 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
Let's see what he does the rest of the season, then you can talk and same here.

skinsfaninok 12-11-2011 09:24 PM

I agree and for the record I wanted to draft Sanchez don't get me wrong I'd take him over Rex all day I just don't think he's much better than JC

FRPLG 12-11-2011 10:32 PM

Re: RGIII Heisman Winner
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;867222]Just curious, who would you take? Manning, Brees, Brady, etc. don't count.[/quote]

Are they not QBs in the league? Why wouldn't they count?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.90429 seconds with 9 queries