Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

an example of a "lame ass post" would be:

:Smoker:

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

who gives a flying flea flicker in hell what that lardass pasta belly has to say about anything?

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

This is truly a mess.

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=RedskinRat]Pastabelli hates Snyder and finds any reason to vent. Coles wants out for selfish (yet understandable) reasons. He wants the numbers and in Gibbs offense last year he didn't get them.[/QUOTE]

In his contract does he have incentive bonuses tied in to his numbers or something?????? In another topic there were comments from other players and even they wondered why Coles didnt give Gibbs a chance..........

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=Paintrain]• No matter how the Laveranues Coles situation plays out in Washington -- whether he is released, traded or remains with the Redskins in 2005 (the least likely scenario) -- the very fact the team is prepared to dump its best wide receiver is further indication of how little owner Dan Snyder understands the significance of continuity. In each of the past two seasons, Snyder declared that the Redskins roster was stable, and that it would be the club's composition for at least the ensuing three seasons. But every time his club fails to reach the playoffs, Snyder panics and the turnover process begins anew. Make no mistake: Snyder deserves credit for his commitment to fielding a championship team. He definitely puts his money where his mouth is and, unlike many of his fraternity brothers in the NFL ownership clique, isn't satisfied with mediocrity or the league's healthiest financial bottom line. But football is a game in which a team can't afford to simply plow things under every season and start over in the rebuilding process. Just two years ago, the Redskins invested a $13 million signing bonus in Coles and sent the New York Jets a first-round draft choice as compensation for signing the fleet wideout as a restricted free agent. Common sense and, more important, football sense dictates that you provide those investments an opportunity to reap dividends. So what if Coles is unhappy with the Joe Gibbs-designed offense, a passing game that rarely goes vertical? The guy is under contract, and you make him play. The rationale that you don't want an unhappy player in the locker room, especially in the case of Coles, is vastly overrated. Coles is a player, a guy who will show up every Sunday, even when he isn't getting the ball enough. Word is that the football people in Washington, including Gibbs, aren't thrilled with Snyder's hair-trigger decision to jettison Coles, and, if that's the case, no one can blame them. Snyder operates under the theory that the grass is always greener, that you make yourself better by bringing in a busload of new players every spring, that free agency is his personal shopping mall. In the NFL, though, the franchises that most often succeed over the long term are the ones that give their own grass a little time to mature.

Hey Pasta Belly, I have 2 words for ya......















You're right. :frusty:[/QUOTE]






wow, do yall remember that article ? that just goes to show how much pasta sucks.:spank:

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=wolfeskins]wow, do yall remember that article ? that just goes to show how much pasta sucks.:spank:[/QUOTE]
too bad a lot of people on here agreed with him too

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=Daseal]Im sorry - I can't blame this on Snyder. This is a decesion Coles made based on the offense he's seen, played in, and apparently not enjoyed. [/QUOTE]

I am definitely happy that Coles did make that decision since we wound up with a pretty good replacement right?:)

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

are you kidding me? Santana Moss hasn't lived up to expectations. I mean, i won't be satisfied until he takes a pass 99 yards for a touchdown. Only then can he be considered adequate.

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=mooby]are you kidding me? Santana Moss hasn't lived up to expectations. I mean, i won't be satisfied until he takes a pass 99 yards for a touchdown. Only then can he be considered adequate.[/QUOTE]
i know we should dump his ass right now

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

Dry humor...I really hope you are [i]trying [/i]to be funny right now.


QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]i know we should dump his ass right now[/QUOTE]

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

[QUOTE=ladyfan06]Dry humor... I really hope you are [i]trying [/i]to be funny right now.


QUOTE=BigSKINBauer]i know we should dump his ass right now[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
Yes because me and mooby are mad at santana for not getting 99 yards on a TD. I really hope you are [i]trying [/i]to be confused right now :laughing2 :cheeky-sm

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

LMAO!





[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer][/QUOTE]
Yes because me and mooby are mad at santana for not getting 99 yards on a TD. I really hope you are [i]trying [/i]to be confused right now :laughing2 :cheeky-sm[/QUOTE]

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

LOL!!! All I got to say is, this thread really had me crackin' up!

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

Yeah Coles clearly has never recovered from that toe injury. He just doesnt run with the same speed that he did...and the proof is in the pudding. His first three years as a starter he averaged over 14 yards per catch. Since the injury? 10.6 with us and 11.1 so far this year with the Jets again. I wonder if thats enough evidence for him to finally have that surgery that he needs...

Re: Pasta Belly's Weekly Redskin Commentary
 

It's funny to read Pasta's scathing view of the Redskins, specifically Dan Snyder now.

I guess the grass was greener on the other side with Moss. :)