Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[quote=dmek25;274572]you will not vote for somebody because of their name? boy, you are deep, arent you?[/quote]


Not just the name well, okay, just the name. I have insomnia and I'm really DRUNK so...that could be half the reason I dont trust him. But Hillary I cant stand. "Oh, her husband cheated on her when he was president. I know! Lets make HER president!" Yeah, great idea....

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

well Im proud to announce the count for the posted results are 12 for Republican and 8 for Democraps.:)
seriously though I think its a pretty fair snapshot of the countrys overall stand of their respective partys.

p.s., and yes ALL the votes were counted!!

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

1. George Allen
2. Duncan Hunter
3. Sam Brownback

Although I plan to vote for Rudy.

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

Make that 13-R , 8-D

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[QUOTE=SkinEmAll;274526]now im just curious here, but are you saying you wouldnt fight for your country because:
(a) you dont agree with [I]this[/I] war?
(b) you dont agree with this war and you dont like Bush?
(c) you cant justify risking your life for your country, no matter what the circumstances?[/QUOTE]

I know you didn't ask me, but I'd like to answer.

I would only fight to DEFEND my country. That means defending against a direct attack. The only reason I would even do that is because I must defend myself and my family. Sorry, I don't care to defend anybody else -- American or otherwise.

Therefore, I would never fight a war overseas, unless the enemy had directly attacked America first (e.g.: Japan in WWII).

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[quote=That Guy;274545]how screwed up is this? 95% on clinton. bleh.

(100%) 1: Sec. Condoleezza Rice (R) Information
(98%) 2: Sen. George Allen (R) Information
(97%) 3: Sen. John McCain (R) Information
(95%) 4: Ex-VP Al Gore (D) Information
(95%) 5: Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) Information
(93%) 6: Gov. Bill Richardson (D) Information
(89%) 7: Ex-Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R)

i'd go for mccain, or giuliani. I don't think i'd EVER vote for rice or hillary (not that they're women, just that i don't like them all that much). my results are screwy cause libertarian types are
in between (conservative economics, more liberal socially).

i think this survey wasn't very good though. Like, i don't care about immigration per say, only ILLEGAL immigration, especially those that are collecting benefits without paying taxes, but that wasn't an option, only 300k/year or don't worry about it.


btw, i think the best race would be mccain vs obama... obama probably needs more experience, but if a dem has to win...[/quote]
You think that a libertarian is more liberal socially? The liberal left thinks that goverment is the cure to all the poverty, drug addiction, day care, etc.. and that the goverment can cure these problesm. A libertarian says ok we will butt out of your life and let you do as you want as long as it does not harm others but do not look to the goverment when your a poor addicted person out on the street. That will be left to charity organization and I used drugs just as one example. The liberal left and the libertarian party are totaly oppsite where one is self reliance (libertarian) and the other is big goverment to take care of you (liberal).

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

100% obama
86% kucinich
84% kerry
81% clark
79% richardson

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[quote=firstdown;275233]You think that a libertarian is more liberal socially? The liberal left thinks that goverment is the cure to all the poverty, drug addiction, day care, etc.. and that the goverment can cure these problesm. A libertarian says ok we will butt out of your life and let you do as you want as long as it does not harm others but do not look to the goverment when your a poor addicted person out on the street. That will be left to charity organization and I used drugs just as one example. The liberal left and the libertarian party are totaly oppsite where one is self reliance (libertarian) and the other is big goverment to take care of you (liberal).[/quote]

Yeah, that's pretty much the way I always thought of Libertarianism as well.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian]Libertarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url]

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[QUOTE=GhettoDogAllStars;275223]I would never fight a war overseas, unless the enemy had directly attacked America first (e.g.: Japan in WWII).[/QUOTE]

I heard those Nazis were pretty bad.

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[QUOTE=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;275252]I heard those Nazis were pretty bad.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, well they pretty much attacked us directly too. I can't remember the ship they sank (Lusitania?), but it was full of Americans.

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[QUOTE=GhettoDogAllStars;275289]Yeah, well they pretty much attacked us directly too. I can't remember the ship they sank (Lusitania?), but it was full of Americans.[/QUOTE]

That was the Kaiser (WWI), not Hitler. Sorry, I'm a history geek.

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[QUOTE=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;275303]That was the Kaiser (WWI), not Hitler. Sorry, I'm a history geek.[/QUOTE]

Sorry about that. I had a feeling it was WWI. Needless to say, I am not a history buff.

Anyways, you do bring up a good point. In the case of WWII, of course I would support action against the Axis -- even without being directly attacked. However, the only way I could justify this action would be due to the threat that the Axis would have posed to myself and my family. I don't exactly support pre-emptive war, but I also recognize that if you wait too long, it may be too late.

I think America entered the war at just the right time (not considering that we were attacked by Japan and Germany declared war on us) -- any later may have been too late. Although, I don't think anyone could have conquered Russia. So, world domination was pretty much out of the question for Germany and/or the Axis powers.

Re: Who Would You Vote For?
 

[quote=firstdown;275233]You think that a libertarian is more liberal socially? The liberal left thinks that goverment is the cure to all the poverty, drug addiction, day care, etc.. and that the goverment can cure these problesm. A libertarian says ok we will butt out of your life and let you do as you want as long as it does not harm others but do not look to the goverment when your a poor addicted person out on the street. That will be left to charity organization and I used drugs just as one example. The liberal left and the libertarian party are totaly oppsite where one is self reliance (libertarian) and the other is big goverment to take care of you (liberal).[/quote]


i meant social liberal in that they're more likely to be pro-choice and less likely to call gay persons abominations of god etc. You missed where i said economically conservative, ie: self reliance.