Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=SBXVII;537622]Finally a good arguement. I can't dissagree. I know there are other teams who would make him their #1 and he would get #1 pay. I just don't buy the whole He's no longer good. but it would be nice if he did take the Skins into consideration and decided he would like to be here. Most likely not though. I'm done. Peace.[/quote]

This is a good argument.
I personally think someone will pay him #2 money however particularly due to his age

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

Henry Ellard was on the "downslide" when he signed with us and played great.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=SmootSmack;537681]I think several people have been trying to make that same point...but I guess [B]Mr. Laywer Man[/B] has a special way with words[/quote]

What's a Laywer Man? Is that someone who pwactices Waw? :)

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=SBXVII;537622]Finally a good arguement. I can't dissagree. I know there are other teams who would make him their #1 and he would get #1 pay. I just don't buy the whole He's no longer good. but it would be nice if he did take the Skins into consideration and decided he would like to be here. Most likely not though. I'm done. Peace.[/quote]

I think myself and alot of others have said the same thing. Guess you were in denial.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

When you draft receivers and a TE with your first three picks, that's it, you are riding with those guys for the next few seasons. If they don't pan out you'll probably get fired (although it's kind of hard to get fired from the Redskins). If they are great you'll get a raise. But regardless, that's your receiving core, and the fact that some other player may theoretically be better than them is irrelevant. If we had drafted three Dlinemen with those picks you can assume we wouldn't have signed Haynesworth. This is how football works.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=53Fan;537728]What's a Laywer Man? Is that someone who pwactices Waw? :)[/quote]

Cowwect

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

I could see New England taking a chance on him.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=53Fan;537728]What's a Laywer Man? Is that someone who pwactices Waw? :)[/quote]

I keep pwacticing, but I never seem to get it wight.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=SmootSmack;537681]I think several people have been trying to make that same point...but I guess Mr. Laywer Man has a special way with words[/quote]

You're just jealous 'cause good speak with words I can - from Yoda, learned I.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=John Denny;537727]Henry Ellard was on the "downslide" when he signed with us and played great.[/quote]

We needed him to. We have 5 WRs right now, 2 which we need to develop for the long-term. Kelly and Thomas do not need ANOTHER veteran in front of them.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;537947]You're just jealous 'cause good speak with words I can - from Yoda, learned I.[/quote]

Some people have a way with words...others not have way

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[quote=Buster;537950]We needed him to. We have 5 WRs right now, 2 which we need to develop for the long-term. Kelly and Thomas do not need ANOTHER veteran in front of them.[/quote]

We need an insurance policy in case the two fail to step up. No? Otherwise all we have is Moss and ARE cause Thrash does nothing but special teams and maybe 1 TD a yr.

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

[url=http://blogs.usatoday.com/thehuddle/2009/04/torry-holt-in-the-fold-for-jaguars.html]Torry Holt in the fold for Jaguars - The Huddle - USATODAY.com[/url]

Re: Holt released by Rams
 

He's signed.

[url=http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/04/20/jaguars-sign-veteran-wr-holt/]NFL.com Blogs » Blog Archive Jaguars sign veteran WR Holt to three-year deal «[/url]