Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=46918)

MTK 03-10-2012 11:47 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=SmootSmack;894880]I'm not unhappy with it at all. Just wish we had held onto our 2nd.[/quote]

I wish it could have been a 2nd next year instead. But it was probably the trump card that pushed this deal over the top.

Still, I could see Allen doing something to move back up.

MTK 03-10-2012 11:49 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
Hey so where's the "insider" that was convinced we were getting McCoy and Shipley?

Probably crying in his corn flakes this morning.

:laughing2

MTK 03-10-2012 11:52 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[url=http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandlers-real-redsk/2012/03/parity-in-the-nfc-east-arms-race.html]Parity in the NFC East arms race - Rich Tandler's Real Redskins[/url]

Skinsfanatic 03-10-2012 11:53 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=LionsFanVisiting;894881]WOW. Thats all I have to say. I called this trade 4 months ago.

My question is though, if Washington gave THAT much up to get RGIII, why not go up one more for Luck? Would the price be that much more for one slot?

Either way, the Skins are getting (were obviously assuming) a GREAT quarterback, on paper that is.[/quote]

Not that I think we care about getting Luck, but if we did the only way to do that would be to get to 2 and then trade to 1. The Colts need one of the 2 quarterbacks, so I don't think they would have traded down to 6 no matter what.

Gtothearry 03-10-2012 11:53 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=LionsFanVisiting;894881]WOW. Thats all I have to say. I called this trade 4 months ago.

My question is though, if Washington gave THAT much up to get RGIII, why not go up one more for Luck? Would the price be that much more for one slot?

Either way, the Skins are getting (were obviously assuming) a GREAT quarterback, on paper that is.[/quote]

Why give up another for Luck if ya think Griffin is better or at least equal to Luck?

skinsfan69 03-10-2012 11:55 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=hutch17;894877]I guess No-one remember us completely ripping off the the Rams 3 years ago in the Carriker trade. It might not be that sexy but we got a first round talent and a starter for 14 spots in the 5th round. And it really looks like we were on the right side of the Blaine Gabbert move back trade last year where we got some guy named kerrigan ( I think he is going to be pretty good) and another draft pick. I will admit that these trades have been few and far between in the last ten years or so but that was the old regime this one has a track record albeit small but a track record all the same of making great trades and hopefully this will turn into the best one yet.

I love this move and think it absolutely had to happen.[/quote]

Yeah but none of the trading we've done has translated to wins.

skinsfaninok 03-10-2012 11:56 AM

[QUOTE=Mattyk;894878]No need to dumb the thread down. Almost 90% already approve.[/QUOTE]

Man does it always have to be black or white?? Come on folks in 2012

Son Of Man 03-10-2012 11:58 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=Mattyk;894872]The price was high, but I don't have a big problem with it. The market sets the price and there were other teams that would have ended up stepping up and paying the same thing, or something very close to it.

If you believe he's a rare talent that can elevate the franchise for the next decade, [B]my thought on it all offseason has been go big or go home[/B]. I think the time was right to make this move. We have the cap room now to surround him with established talent, and Allen is crafty at wheeling and dealing in the draft to acquire more picks.

RGIII will put butts in the seats, create buzz on and off the field, and he [B]gives us a legit potential superstar QB for the first time in forever[/B].[/quote]

This. Couldn't agree more!

MTK 03-10-2012 11:58 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[url=http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/43621/losing-out-on-rg3-is-devastating-to-browns]Losing out on RG3 is devastating to Browns - AFC North Blog - ESPN[/url]

Gtothearry 03-10-2012 11:59 AM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=skinsfaninok;894889]Man does it always have to be black or white?? Come on folks in 2012[/quote]

Just pure stupidity is all that is........

Gtothearry 03-10-2012 12:02 PM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
I'm glad we made this move before Griffin has his proday and wows the media once again. The trading partners could've went up after his pro day.

Skinsfanatic 03-10-2012 12:04 PM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=Gtothearry;894893]One thing that is good news. We made this move before Griffin has his proday and wows the media once again.[/quote]

Maybe if he is amazing enough at his proday we can trade the pick to the browns for their two first rounders this year and their 1st rounders in 13 and 14.

j/k, I am excited about RGIII.

Sonny9TD 03-10-2012 12:04 PM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=Mattyk;894891][url=http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/43621/losing-out-on-rg3-is-devastating-to-browns]Losing out on RG3 is devastating to Browns - AFC North Blog - ESPN[/url][/quote]

Nice to know that the Browns were willing to do about the same deal. I'd like to think we offered just a tad bit more to get it done. If giving up a 2nd this year can be called a tad. Still good to know we didn't offer much more more than the Browns. That article actually makes me feel better. Thanks

CultBrennan59 03-10-2012 12:07 PM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/10/redskins-rams-wanted-to-keep-trade-quiet-until-monday/]Redskins, Rams wanted to keep trade quiet until Monday | ProFootballTalk[/url]

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/10/at-last-minute-browns-tried-and-failed-to-trade-for-rams-pick/]At last minute, Browns tried and failed to trade for Rams’ pick | ProFootballTalk[/url]

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/10/redskins-traded-more-for-griffin-than-giants-for-eli-or-falcons-for-vick/]Redskins traded more for Griffin than Giants for Eli, Falcons for Vick | ProFootballTalk[/url]

Son Of Man 03-10-2012 12:08 PM

Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
 
[quote=Mattyk;894891][url=http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/43621/losing-out-on-rg3-is-devastating-to-browns]Losing out on RG3 is devastating to Browns - AFC North Blog - ESPN[/url][/quote]

That about sums up where we would have been if BA/MS didn't get the deal done.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.89738 seconds with 9 queries